Water Connects Us All

Possibly the thing I found most surprising about our walk during class on Wednesday was that the University of Richmond campus makes up only about 15% of the Little Westham Creek watershed.  Little Westham Creek is seemingly so small; I had a hard time believing it went on much past our school. However, the creek provides a significant connection between Westhampton Lake and neighboring bodies of water such as the James River and East Branch Tuckahoe Creek.  Even this small body is important as a watershed, as bodies of water can have watersheds that are much, much larger than the bodies themselves.  It’s all a matter of where the rain runs to.  These watersheds connect chunks of land that are seemingly unconnected.

There is always the talk of the “Richmond Promise” that the University of Richmond has made, and part of that promise is how we pledge to be connected to the greater Richmond area.  I always thought this pledge was just sort of something we said to put on a good appearance, but never really acted on, as students don’t even leave campus much.  However, it was interesting to hear about how the University actually works with the local communities to prevent heavy river flow in our watershed.  The university constructs LEED buildings and works on its sustainability, while the communities make rain barrels and rain gardens.  Working for the school’s sustainability department, I always knew about our efforts, but now I see them as a part of how we interact with the community as a whole.  Together we work make a better watershed.  Before that walk I also only thought of the one directional interaction: University of Richmond community getting involved in the surrounding Richmond community.  However, as we work together to improve the watershed, the community is more getting involved with us, as we contain only a small part of the Little Westham watershed, but yet the biggest benefit of the creek: Westhampton Lake.

I’ve edited this map so Little Westham Creek is in yellow.  Surrounded by multiple important roads, the University of Richmond Campus, a county club, and other bodies of water, the creek runs past very different areas.  While the population at the U of R is young, our neighbors at the country club tend to be much older. In our surrounding neighborhoods there are people of all ages living, working, and going to school.  The water links us all and makes these spatial and demographic boundaries irrelevant.  Even a small thing like a creek can create a cohesive community out of a large area.

Posted in Westhampton Lake | 2 Comments

Week 1: Westhampton Lake – More Than Meets The Eye

Right at the heart of campus lays our very own Westhampton Lake. Every student has walked along its shore or across its body, absorbing its tranquility and beauty. At night, you can always find someone leaning backwards over the ledge of the Commons looking at Upside-down Lake, the phenomenon where, when you look at the lake upside-down, the reflection in the water is so exact that it appears to be real. However, there is more to Westhampton Lake than meets the eye.

Last Wednesday, we took a little field trip to take a closer look at the body of water we thought we knew so well. Our first stop was the inflow of the lake, a slow-flowing river known as Little Westham. From my research this summer, where I surveyed the lake’s outflow for freshwater sponges, I guess I knew that there must have been an inflow. Like many others, however, I never really took the time to look for it. Until now, I have been one of those students who walks past the lake everyday on the way to class and fails to fully appreciate the lake.

Since then I have thought about what else I “know” about the lake. I know it is man-made, once the home to a fantastic amusement park in the early 1900’s. I know it is home to a variety of wildlife – geese and ducks are the obvious, but it is also home to snapping turtles, fish, and one resident blue heron. I know that when there used to be a gate separating the two colleges, guys used to swim across the lake after curfew to meet up with their girlfriends after hours.

What I didn’t know about the lake is that it is also fed by countless pipes and drains that funnel runoff from parking lots and sidewalks directly into the lake. This runoff has no time to be absorbed into the surrounding soil, but instead drags chemicals from fertilizer, oil, fowl feces, and other pollutants into the lake.

What I didn’t know was that our lake has had reports of health concerns for having a substantial amount of E. Coli in its water (at recently as 1995). These health concerns mean that the lake does not meet swimming health standards, hence the ban on swimming in the lake in 1976 (also a little known fact).

What I didn’t know was that our lake is not only a dumping site for silt and sand that comes from upstream, but also apparently for Volkswagens (three of which have been found in the lake over the years), patio furniture, traffic cones, and a plethora of Green Bikes (some of which are still in the lake).

But what surprised me the most was that 4 students have drowned in the lake.

I think a lot of UR students take the lake for granted and don’t take the time to appreciate it and learn more about it. Hopefully during the rest of my time here at UR, I can learn to make the effort to look just a little bit closer, explore areas of campus that I have never seen, and learn as much as I can about the surrounding environment.

For more information, I direct you to these two Collegian articles: Westhampton Lake holds surprising finds (http://thecollegianur.com/2010/02/04/westhampton-lake-holds-surprising-finds/10467/) and Dispelling the myths of Westhampton Lake (http://thecollegianur.com/2011/01/27/dispelling-the-myths-of-westhampton-lake/16832/).

Posted in Westhampton Lake | 2 Comments

Little Westham

Our second class for Earth Lodge was honestly unlike any class I have ever been in. I remember in high school when students would beg teachers on sunny days to have class outside. I can assure you that every single teacher that was asked this question would smile, laugh, and make a snide remark about the student who dared to ask. There were, however, two glaring differences with our situation on Wednesday. The first was that it was raining and the second was that our Professors initiated the trip outside.

And so it was with mild trepidation that we exited the warm belly of the Atlantic house to the even warmer and wetter banks of our campus lake. I have to say now that I felt a little embarrassed at how little I knew about my own surrounding area. I walked over the bridge of our lake countless times my freshman year and looked at the trees and the water but I never really payed attention to what I was looking at. I had no idea until this week that a creek, Little Westham Creek, feeds into Westhampton Lake. My first thought upon visiting the creek after a very brief walk from the Atlantic House was that it looked small and weak, even a little sad. Why were we looking at this if the amount of water flowing was equivalent to the amount in a bathtub?

Let me stop right here and say that this kind of thinking does people in. Even the smallest, most insignificant little stream leads to something much larger, much more powerful, and equally as important as the most raging river (perhaps one not too far away like the James). Our professor spoke to us about the fact that with increasing urban development, the amount of pollutants and run-off that find its way into these little streams and creeks is growing. The oil on our parking lots and the fertilizers on our flowers have no where to go after a rain storm and increasingly, hydrophilic plants that would normally soak up these waters on the buffers or riparian zones of our water bodies haven’t been allowed to grow properly. It’s even clear around our own lake- the banks of most of it are almost completely bare save the area closest to the main road that are populated by Baldcypress’s and River Birches.

Upon further research, I began to realize just how important our little creek really was. The county of Henrico has been pushing forward with efforts to improve the buffer zone, encouraging cooperation amongst homeowners, the Chesapeake Bay Foundation, gardeners, and even the University of Richmond to protect and expand the buffer zone. The county even outlined a list of plants that would soak up more water and help prevent further erosion and pollutants from entering the water. This would help provide shade for the water which would regulate temperatures, but also provide more habitat for wildlife, and improve the quality of not only the James River watershed, but the Chesapeake Bay watershed as well. It made me realize that the implications of the health of our little creek cannot be taken lightly. It is clear that small as any creek may seem (not just Little Westham), it is part of a larger and deeply interconnected and delicate system that requires appreciation and great sensitivity to maintain.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on Little Westham

Maymont: An American Estate

Maymont is a 100 acre park in the middle of a developed city. The property was owned by the very wealthy Dooley family. When Mrs. Dooley died in 1925, the family willed the land to the City of Richmond, and it is currently managed by a private non-profit organization. Maymont has significant impact on the James River watershed. Although Maymont is not part of the James River park system, it is a large park along the James. If this property wasn’t a park, it would likely be urban development, since it is such a prime location along the river. This would add to urban runoff and the other negative impacts on watersheds associated with urbanization.

I know most of Earthlodge has had the opportunity to visit this gem at least once. Volunteering there allowed me to realize just how important volunteers are to Maymont. The huge amount of volunteer hours equate to roughly 11 full time jobs. Maymont would not be the same without its volunteers. When I volunteered, I worked in some of the gardens. I spent most of my time weeding before the planting of new spring flowers. I worked with a variety of people, including students from VCU. Many of the volunteers I met were regulars, which made me feel like the neophyte of the group. However, all the other volunteers were very helpful in directing me on gardening techniques and other information. The work certainly was not as engaging or as exciting as my last volunteer experience with Ralph White, but I believe Maymont is an important resource for Richmond and the James River and I was happy to help them out.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Maymont: An American Estate

Synthesis 2# pictures (either my pictures keep disappearing or I don’t know how to use this site) just in case…here they are again!

Posted in Synthesis | Comments Off on Synthesis 2# pictures (either my pictures keep disappearing or I don’t know how to use this site) just in case…here they are again!

Final Synthesis

As I began thinking about this post there was one thing that has been stuck in the forefront of my mind: Cronon’s belief in tearing down the false division between man and nature. During our last class I was on the Potomac team, and although I didn’t believe what we were arguing for, we did a great job trying to prove the Potomac was a superior choice to the James for a National Natural Landmark.  However, the one argument that I could never counter was Kenta’s constant references to Cronon’s article and how the James serves as a perfect example of nature and human interconnectivity. Now, perhaps I am stuck on this argument because I hate losing, but I don’t think that’s the only reason. I entered Earth Lodge with the intention of learning more about the intersection of humans and nature, particularly in an urban setting. Richmond and the James River serve as a perfect example of efforts to bring natural elements into an urban setting and allow people to have a “wilderness” right in their backyards.

As I have commented several times before, Richmond and the James River Park System does a fantastic job of reminding us that there is no division between humans and nature. We are a part of nature; we can try to keep it out and pretend we are separate, or we can embrace it. Ralph White and the James River Parks System’s approach to park management is the one of the biggest steps in creating that ethos within the city. The “natural” areas of the park system are dotted with old bridges, buildings, and other infrastructure; they turned a pipeline into a trail! The presence of these human elements in the parks confronts the notion that wilderness and nature somehow equals “untouched” and “natural”. This might not be a conscious confrontation to most people, but if the natural areas they experience are right in their backyards they begin to care about nature more.

This brings me into the idea of Dan Forsyth’s research that the more people know about watersheds they more they care about them. Likewise, the more people experience and learn about nature the more likely they are to care about it. Ralph White has not only created an amazing system of parks, but he has also served as the city’s primary environmental educator through the Parks System. This year I attended a Brown Bag discussion by the lady who runs Blue Sky Fund, an organization that gets children with little exposure to nature out for hiking and backpacking trips. The program has a fantastic mission of raising the exposure level to untouched “wilderness” which is very important; however there is also so much that can be experienced within the City of Richmond itself. I think that by getting kids their first taste of nature the goal is that they will want to experience it more, and therefore will be more inclined to take advantage of the parks and natural areas within our city as well. Many of us joined Earth Lodge because we are active hikers, campers, backpackers, climbers, kayakers, cyclers, etc, but we had yet to really embrace the James River Parks System beyond Pony Pasture. We thought of nature as something we went outside of the city to experience, now we know better.

I realized how special the James was when I was on my SEEDS Louisiana trip. I wanted to see how people living in the bayou and in New Orleans felt about the Mississippi River in comparison to how Richmonders felt about the James. The people in the bayou were very tied to the natural landscape, and were especially concerned about loss of wetlands (as I have detailed in an earlier post). However, in New Orleans I heard almost nothing about the river, besides efforts to control it with levees and locks. One day we went down to the river bank in the Lower 9th Ward and looked up towards the city to see this view:

I was shocked by the lack of trees. At first I said it as a joke to Jenni, commenting on the lack of a riparian buffer zone and how it was probably bad for the river. Even though I said it as a joke it was the first thing that stuck out to me about the view. Yes it was a pretty view of the city skyline, but I couldn’t get over the lack of trees. Contrast this with this picture I took of the Richmond from Hollywood Cemetery a week before, and I missed the fusion of city and biota that makes Richmond so beautiful.

(Ok so maybe the pictures don’t illuminate it as well as my memories do, but humor me here)

So this brings me to the question of “what can I take away from the class?” Yes, I can recognize when a river has a buffer zone in 2 seconds flat and identify potential issues associated with it, but what else? What have I learned that can help me change attitudes towards nature? My final project group has started answering this question by seeking to educate our own campus community with a series of signs around the lake (see earlier post for more information). If we can get the community to become more aware of the geography, hydrography, and ecology of the lake and our campus then hopefully they will become more aware that our campus is a “natural” area even though we humans have such a large presence on the land. If they understand we live in a watershed and that “wilderness” is right outside their window hopefully they will be more inclined to explore and value it. Hopefully we can be part of the process of turning our campus back into a “wilderness” by changing how people perceive wilderness now and wherever they live.

Posted in Synthesis | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Final Synthesis

Sight

As my sophomore year winds down and my time in Earthlodge comes to an end, I realize how much I’ve grown both as a person and a learner this year, and how much of that is because of this class. Simply put: I’ve gained sight.

My recognition of this change came last weekend in Kissimmee, Florida, when I was at the Quidditch World Cup with the team. About three minutes into my first game of the tournament, a guy from the University of Texas-Austin team hurled a bludger (dodgeball) directly into my eye, temporarily blinding it. Trying not to panic, after the game I iced my eye and began to blink continuously and frantically, hoping to regain some semblance of vision. No luck. Luckily, a few of my teammates’ parents were at the tournament to watch us play, and one of the mothers offered to drive me to the ER. Five hours, multiple explanations of way Quidditch works and a diagnosis of traumatic iritis later, I was headed back to the fields with about 60% of my left eye’s vision returned. The percentage has been steadily increasing ever since, and my vision is nearly completely back now. My black eye and hospital wrist band are the only remaining evidence of my optical crisis.

From the moment I realized my vision was gone, all I wanted in the world was to see normally again. I didn’t care that exams were coming up, that I was going abroad by myself, or that I missed my family. Every other problem I’ve ever had just seemed so ridiculous and trivial. Terrifying images of the countless changes to my life that would occur if my vision never returned spun rampant through my chaotic mind.

My point is that my slow re-development of literal vision made me realize how much more I notice and appreciate now in comparison to the beginning of this year, and even the beginning of freshman year. It reminds me of our distinction between a region and a place. I used to not think about where I was very much, because it all seemed so unimportant. The point is I’m here, why over-analyze?

It’s not over-analysis, it’s awareness. It’s the ability to look around, know which trees surround you, if you’re in a riparian zone or not, if you’re near a point or non-point source of pollution, etc. My heightened awareness was definitely in play during our recent canoe trip, as the entire time I found myself connecting puzzle piece after puzzle piece of class discussions to my surroundings. From the water tests we conducted to the simple appreciation of the cosmetic value of James River detritus, I felt more in-touch with my surroundings by far than ever before. And that’s not to say that this new awareness has crept up on me and jumped out just now. Reflecting on my blog posts this semester, I can actually track and see myself changing. The most obvious indicator of my increased perception lies in my spring break blog post. Even more exciting, I can see my classmates’ progression of perception as well. Anne, Kevin and Natalie have all shown an increased awareness of their surroundings this semester.

Aside from my heightened appreciation of the physical beauty of everything around me, I now see what an effect a person’s passion has on everything. Yes, it’s one of the key characteristics of an effective environmental leader, but in my opinion it is a vital characteristic of a successful individual. Take Ralph White for example. When we were walking down the pipe in front of the heron rookery, and talking on the beach, he simply came alive. It was as if the James River was his bloodstream and life source. His eyes lit up when he was speaking, his body language was bouncy, and you could just tell that he was so thrilled that we were there and ready to learn everything he had to teach us. Second example: our Potomac/James River debate last week. Kenta and Taylor were on fire. If one of them had asked to represent me in court that day, I might have said yes. Their charisma lets their passion shine through, and that is what makes it so powerful. However, I’ve also come to understand that everybody is passionate, it’s just that for some it just takes a little more digging to find. Some people were quieter during the debate, though they are some of the most environmentally passionate people in that room. Just as everybody expresses themselves differently, everybody’s passion is expressed differently. I’m passionate about the environment. I love the James River. However, I cannot begin to compete with the level of debate that occurred between Taylor and Kenta, because I’m an horrific public speaker. I prefer to let my environmental passion show through my dedication to science, to research. Ralph White prefers to show it through teaching. Some write about it, some attend protests, some volunteer. And no strategy is better than another.

Sight can have so many different meanings. I have my literal sight back, and will never again take it for granted. But this year with Earthlodge I’ve developed a new kind of sight, one that lets me appreciate where I am, what that means, and what is going on the ecosystem around me. I’ve learned to recognize the passion in everybody, and understand that everybody may choose to express that passion in different ways. I’ve learned that taking a step back and observing my surroundings is a better therapy than any psychiatrist, that a greater comprehension of the environment and the people around me is a better teacher than any book. I’ve learned so much this year being in Earthlodge, and the summary of what I’ve learned is so abstract that it can only be properly articulated in the words I spoke after stepping back onto the Quidditch field post-hospital on Saturday: I can see.

 

Posted in Synthesis | Comments Off on Sight

The relationship between rivers, people and cities

Since childhood, I have consistently swam, fished, wakeboarded and explored a variety of rivers, lakes and ocean. My experience in and around watershed has been extensive. However, I until recently, I failed to acknowledge the importance of these watersheds outside of my own personal recreation. When I first arrived at University of Richmond, the James River was a mystery that I did not bother to look into. Throughout my first year at Richmond, I visited Belle Isle a time or two and frequently mountain biked along the shores of the James. I did not learn the real significance of the river until I joined Earthlodge. Rivers connect people to cities and influence how people view their sense of place.

The James River serves as he most important and central feature of Richmond. Throughout the semester, the significance of the James throughout Richmond’s founding and history, economic development and sense of place and bring people together has become increasingly apparent. Kenta commented on the importance of the James and how it defines the city, which resonated with me. Without the James, it is not likely that there would be the abundance of parks that the James River Park system has. The James creates a reason to conserve and created protected areas. Without the James, the Buttermilk and North Bank trails that I frequently mountain bike would not have a reason to be there. Through the activities of Earthlodge, I have realized the importance of the James. If I had not volunteered with Ralph White to pick up trash on Mayo Island, then I would have not realized the importance of the James in bringing together people and defining place. While on the James River, he explained how historically, the James provided fish for a variety of conflicting tribes, but when fishing season hit a peak, the opposing Indian chiefs came together to put their differences aside to focus on the productive harvest. Even today, White noted, the James brings together people from all classes. In one stretch of the river homeless people fish from the shore to keep fish for dinner, while fancy fly-fisherman wade in the rapids to target smallmouth bass and American Shad. Simultaneously, children play in the sand along the shore and kayakers travel through America’s best urban white water. Although I have had extensive experiences with others on rivers, I have never been able to verbalize the characteristic of moving water to bring people together until now.

In other cities around the world, rivers continue to have influence to connect people to their cities. As I mentioned in an earlier post, the Colorado River plays a critical role in Austin, Texas. The river is dammed into large lakes, which support year round recreation, including fishing, boating, swimming and kayaking. Downtown Austin hugs Lady Bird Lake, and provides beautiful views of green space. In Austin, the river serves a similar purpose as the James does for Richmond. The Colorado provides a center for the city to congregate as well as a place that brings people together, such as events like Austin City Limits music festival that centers along the shore of Lady Bird Lake. However, rivers serve far different purposes in places like the Amazon. In the Amazon, rivers serve as an extremely important feature in the Amazon rainforest, such as a major source of transportation and as a food source. In the remote stretches of southwestern Amazonia, the Peruvian city of Pucallpa lies at the end of the road system. From here, the only source of transportation for the various loggers, rubber tappers, drug cultivators and indigenous people are the Ucalayi River and Abujao River (see map). In these communities, rivers facilitate travel to Pucallpa for necessary services or goods. Additionally, the river provides a significant source of protein for many of these communities. Without the river, there would be no reason to live there.

Learning about our watershed and the connections between it and the people will be important in preserving the health of our watersheds. The importance of rivers in providing ecosystem services, recreation, and transportation stated above implies that we should strive to protect them. Forsyth argues that individuals are more likely to work to protect streams and rivers in their watershed if they are more aware of local water features. I can personally attest to Forsyth’s argument. Since I began to learn more about the James through class, I definitely have a stronger desire to protect it. Groffman states the dramatic effects urbanization has had on riparian areas and watersheds. This will likely continue as population continues to grow, especially in the west, where there is more room to grow. By focusing part of environmentalism on education, watersheds can be partially protected. Lauren talks about how her group is working to raise awareness in the James River watershed by adding signs on campus. This is a small, but meaningful way to raise awareness, which could in turn serve to protect the James River watershed.

Through my growth from Earthlodge, I have learned the physical, political and social characteristics of the James River. More generally, I have learned the importance of rivers in the larger context in the connection between people and place. As I continue to learn of their importance, I hope to apply my knowledge to future situations. When I go back to Austin, I will now view the Colorado in a different context, outside of my own use. I will observe how it serves to connect people to other people and helps define the place that is Austin. Furthermore, when I spend six weeks in Pucallpa this summer, I hope to apply what I have learned about the characterstics of watersheds and contextualize the watershed within the perspective of local people. As I plan to spend much of my free time on the water, understanding the importance of watersheds will be invaluable knowledge.

Posted in Synthesis | Comments Off on The relationship between rivers, people and cities

Synthesis 2

As my time in Earth Lodge comes to an end, I think back on not only everything I’ve done and learned about but also how I have changed as well.  I feel as though an appreciation for human beings’ relationship and interaction with the water around them has now fully realized itself within me; I know that I was cognizant of this relationship before being an Earth Lodger, but now I think I truly understand its importance.  Delving deep into the study of one river, the James, and the people who call its watershed home was integral, I think, in fostering the appreciation that I have now.  I’ll certainly miss being in Earth Lodge.  I’ll miss being part of this group, where each member’s insight, through this blog, was as much a part of the learning experience as the lectures in class and the field trips outside of class.  I thoroughly enjoyed my time in Earth Lodge, and I’m truly grateful for all of the experiences I have had while being a part of this awesome group of people.

Looking back on class experiences, one of the most memorable to me would be meeting Ralph White and listening to him talk about the river that he obviously loves very much and fought very hard to protect during his stay as the head of the James River Park System.  His wisdom, commanding voice, and passion for the protection of the James and its history were truly awe-inspiring.  He had us totally captivated and enthralled during our entire walk down to the heron rookery near Mayo Bridge.  Walking on that sewage pipeline to see the herons more up close illustrated the connectivity between the city of Richmond, the water of the James, and the wildlife that lives right in the midst of it.  The fact that there is a sort of “trail” in the James River Park System located directly on a sewage pipe is a testament to how something with at least a semblance of “naturalness” can be made out of something seemingly nature-killing: a mechanical vein of the city.  That experience certainly had a big effect on me, and I was very excited when I found out that I would be able to volunteer with Ralph White at Mayo Bridge, cleaning up graffiti and homeless encampments.  I know many other lodgers felt the same way I did about Ralph White, and that he had as profound an impact on them as an environmental leader.

I also look back on the time we spent in class learning about riparian buffer areas, and the important role they play for the health of the James and the surrounding floodplain.  The discussion of these buffer areas in relation to the idea of connectivity emphasized throughout the entire course was very interesting, especially when we got into the effects that human beings can have on these riparian areas.  Human beings can disrupt connectivity between river and the surrounding land through development, replacing penetrable soil with hard, solid concrete.  But, in our discussions of urban parks and the visit of Michelle Kokolis, we learned that a lot can be done to restore this connectivity.  Having Michelle give her lecture in class after already being familiar with the James River report card she gave us a better understanding of the problems that have been plaguing the James, and how a restoration of riparian buffers could go a long way in helping to fix these problems.  What I thought was especially helpful for getting people educated about the way their actions affect the James was the online tool Michelle showed us, showing how much runoff was flowing from where we lived and what path it took to reach the James.  Tools like this, meant to educate people about their relationship to their watershed, have the potential to be extremely effective at reducing nutrient runoff, a major problem for the ecological health of the James.  As we found our own campus on the map, and traced our water to the James, I couldn’t help but think of ways for the University of Richmond to decrease the amount of runoff coming off of its impenetrable surfaces.

Keeping in mind the information on the river report card for the James, I was curious about what the water quality was like on the middle James during our canoe trip.  Where we canoed was quite a long ways from the heart of Richmond, but it was also downstream.  When we took our own water quality tests, I tried to equate their results to the grade that the James received on the river report card.  Granted, our tests were taken up a creek and quite a ways from the center of Richmond, and the riparian buffers were well intact where we were canoeing.

In my reflection blog posts, I chronicled the life returning to our Little Westham Creek watershed.  While we were canoeing, I could also see the life nearly fully returned on the banks of the James as well.  Leaves have returned to the trees, (which will no doubt help in identifying them later), and the air is filled with pollen, (not so good for me, but good for the trees).  As the semester comes to a close, I think back on all of the experiences I’ve had in Earth Lodge; I can say wholeheartedly that being in Earth Lodge was one of my most important experiences so far in college, and the appreciation for my relationship to the water around me will stick with me for the rest of my life.

Posted in Synthesis | Comments Off on Synthesis 2

Final Reflections

This Saturday my friend visited from DC. As she is a passionate environmentalist and outdoorswoman, I was pleased the weather was cooperating in my plan to show off my city. Maybe it was the debate from class, but I felt a strange need to flaunt the James River Park System; the first indicator of how much my attachment and pride for Richmond has grown since she last visited a year ago. We walked to Pony Pasture. On the way we passed me and Jenni’s community garden plot on the Gamble Mill’s Trail, saw a snake swimming downstream from the Huguenot Bridge, and watched a group of kids pull an eel out of the water that was longer than my arm. As we wound our way down Riverside Drive, Kate kept commenting on the interconnectivity of the neighborhoods and the river; I think I realized for the first time how unique our city truly is.

In our debate I kept arguing that the James is representative of a fall zone because it runs through the middle of downtown Richmond. As Kate and I drove from Bikram on the other side of the river back to campus, then from the park to dinner in Carytown, I came to recognize the way my life in Richmond literally straddles the river. One really can walk from their front porch to the river, and as I’ve began to learn, everyone who claims to be a “true Richmonder” seems to have their own secret spot along the James to call their own. Last week I spent the night at my friend Amy’s. We woke up early and biked to Texas Beach before my 9am. We sat on a footbridge overlooking the canal and train tracks, the lush grasses below swaying in a current straight from UofR. I remember the first time I visited Belle Isle someone told me it is the best place to go if you want to see the demographics of RVA. Along the shore are the river rats that populate this city: from the aged fisherman to their grandchildren, the tourists and the first timers, each eddy-creating rock islands a human visitor. The various small parks scattered throughout the city feel like the hole-in-the-wall restaurants throughout the Fan; instead of Kaplan’s ideal of holding a sense of “away-ness”, they seem to sit firmly within our conception of our city and daily activity. It’s hard to perceive a wilderness/civilization duality when a river winds its way through our lives.

I think the seamless connectivity found in Richmond can undeniably be accredited to the leadership of Ralph White. Of course the river gets the real credit, but something about the rarity of Pipeline Park’s sliver of a presence along the Heron Rookery is magical. The park system really feels like our park system, and at times the units don’t even feel like parks at all; they’re just part of the city. When we bolted across 14th Street and slipped down a ladder to see the Heron Rookery, I remember feeling like I was seeing the undiscovered parts of RVA. Yet it only took a little looking around to realize we were under train tracks, fifty feet from sky scrapers and constantly being passed by punk kids, moms and reporters alike.

Although we have the privilege of such unequivocal connectivity, as Dr. Forsyth’s study showed, it’s hard for people to feel compelled to protect their watersheds if they’re not even aware they live in one. Before this course I had never heard the term “watershed” (or catchment, although I had heard basin without really knowing what it meant). The entire walk to Pony Pasture I was eagerly shouting out tree species and concepts from class, much to the esteem of my friend. When we got to the park, I was proud to see benches lining the river with plaques signed “Outdoor House”. I realized that having the river and the parks there is the start, but to actually understand the river’s beauty and problems requires more.

The James River Association’s report card provided me with a thorough understanding of the river, but for those who don’t seek it out, how do they find information? The answer: places like Earth Lodge. Our class is not solely about learning, it is a class that breeds environmental leaders. All of our final projects are based upon improving the connectivity our city has with its river. Through the almost libertarian (shall I dare label it?) approach of Ralph White, groups like Earth Lodge are able to make infrastructural improvements (such as shuttles literally taking people to the river or educational signs explaining campus’ relationship with its watershed). Without such, we cannot expect people to be informed, or for change to occur.

I am excited to leave Earth Lodge with a summer in Richmond ahead of me. Sharing a place with Jenni, Taylor and Thomas, I am certain we’ll find endless ways to apply our learning to our first apartment. Passing the community garden I could not help but notice its lack of rain barrels; as I sat on the banks of Pony Pasture I imagined every passing log as a sturgeon or manatee; and as we left, a decaying branch of a Sycamore was sprouting a new sapling.

Posted in Synthesis | Comments Off on Final Reflections