RIB 7&8

In chapters seven and eight of Reality is Broken, McGonigal writes about the consequences (mostly positive according to her) of integrating games into everyday life. She argues that by integrating games into our everyday, sometimes even monotonous lives, we can become more “self-motivated and self-directed, intensely interested and genuinely enthusiastic.” One such example in which she explains this idea is what she calls the “engagement gap.” The engagement gap refers to the educational phenomenon in which student performance suffers due to lack of interest and motivation due to inadequate stimulation from their work. The most direct example of this she provides is of a sixth through twelfth grade school in New York City called Quest to Learn. In an attempt to overcome the engagement gap, the school emphasizes learning through games. The school replaces traditional school concepts such as quizzes and final exams with “leveling-up” and “boss levels,” respectively. This is an instance of converting literal work into play, but McGonigal also discusses the implications of making work more rewarding by utilizing alternate realities.

In chapter eight, McGonigal argues that “compared with games, reality is pointless and unrewarding.” Personally, I disagree with this statement. However, I concede that this may be true for some people, but generally speaking, any greater dissatisfaction that a person may live with is likely better solved through direct action. Games alone cannot improve a person’s quality of life in the long run in terms of Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs. Games will not feed you or keep you safe: the two base-most categories of Maslow’s diagram. On a related note, McGonigal also explores the power of virtual souvenirs and power-ups. In a literal sense, I believe they have no real value. However, when people are able to display them in a virtual community to signify achievement, I do believe that they are more likely to hold value due to the potential social acclaim/attention. The more games are integrated with our lives, the more our lives begin to mimic games and we act accordingly.

5 Responses

  1. Micaela Willoughby says:

    I really like how you connected McGonigal’s ideas to Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs. She writes about students who are only bored with school, not students who are disinterested because they’re being bullied, having trouble at home, or working part-time. There are other reasons people throw themselves into videogames and their reasons might be toward the base of the pyramid. Though McGonigal was able to help her concussion recovery with a game, I don’t think all situations can be solved so simply.

  2. Josephine Bossidy says:

    Referring to your first paragraph, I think McGonigal gave a good example of becoming self-motivated when she introduced SuperBetter. Although I didn’t think all the games in the chapter served a real purpose, I found this one interesting. McGonigal took her own personal experience of having a concussion and implemented it into a game. She comforted others who were suffering by giving them a purpose and something to do to distract themselves from their misery.

  3. Hyewon Hong says:

    I do feel like McGonigal severely cherry picks her examples, and kind of disregards the huge population of people who are satisfied with their lives. When you play an MMO, which is basically what a community ARG is, you build a community, you have human interaction, and you make friends. To some, that could be a great jumping point if they were struggling with social situations, for others, simply an opportunity to make friends. But once that scaffolding is there, are video games really necessary to enjoy life? I feel like McGonigal introduces ideas in a cherry picked way (which is fair I mean, but her few counter examples are pretty bad too), and doesn’t follow through on her ideas that much.

  4. Ahsan Ahmad says:

    I liked your take on the content of chapter 8. From what I’ve been noticing, there are indeed a few too many absolute statements throughout the book; most of the time, I find them whenever McGonigal is trying to push the ‘reality is trash, go digital!’ agenda which ends up being counterproductive due to its sheer forced nature. However, I think we can still derive actual meaning from these if we acknowledge that there is some truth to the statements, or that the statements are true for some people. You’ve covered that part pretty well in your second paragraph when you mentioned that while games definitely can not provide sustenance, they can still provide us with some motivation or distraction if applied to practical work.

  5. Shanay Amin says:

    I agree with McGonigal’s theory to integrate games into every day life. I don’t know about other people but for me playing games is one of the few things that I can get my have both my brain working and have my mind interested at the same time. Integrating Games in my life would be extremely helpful for me to to be more productive.