Intersectionality is the identification of multiple factors of advantage and disadvantage in our society as a whole. Historically, media has been a very shortcoming in its ability to produce an “ideal” look that is applicable to more than one demographic. The classic physique of a “white, physically and psychologically able, perceived to be heterosexual and middle-upper class” persona that has been plastered across media for decades has ultimately fabricated an illusion this is what we are all striving for, and if it’s not, we should be. Intersectionality, however, diffuses this problematic mindset into one that can understand and decode the complexities within oppression and power in our society. One example I’ve seen of intersectionality in media is in the television series Grand Army. Although television series can never truly depict realistic life representations, the show does a good job incorporating topics such as sexuality, race, addiction, class, ability throughout the singular community of students. Incorporating and prioritizing representation in media not only increases the complexity and quality of the production itself, but also brings awareness to the truths of society: the numerous advantages and disadvantages of individuals that must simultaneously reside in our society.
Incorporating characters with overlapping and interlocking identities in media is essential in brining to light the complexities of intersectionality. Although the term was defined fairly recently, the concept has played an integral role in culture for centuries. I liked your example of Grand Army as a show that normalises intersectional identities, especially as its one of the first of its kind. I find that shows that give representation to characters with overlapping identities help society understand how different systems of oppression and power affect individuals with varying race, class, gender, and sexual identities.