Hi everyone! I hope everyone enjoyed the sun today – I can’t believe there was snow on the ground only a week ago!
This week we discussed instruction and assessment. I really enjoyed exploring how to select and analyze assessments, and I found the worksheet “Constructing and Evaluating Assessment Types” to be especially beneficial. I found it incredibly useful to see examples of poorly written assessment questions alongside improved versions, and I think this will be a useful tool when evaluating potential assessments in the future. One key takeaway I had from this activity was the importance of consistency. Consistency is key not only in the clarity of individual questions, but across the entire assessment from the format of the test to the balance of true vs. false statements. One of my favorite insights from this discussion was the idea of questioning why we would ever feel the need to “trick” students on an assessment, and to consider what the true purpose of an assessment is – to measure student understanding, not to catch them off guard or make them feel inadequate.
I think my biggest takeaway from this week’s class is that as educators, we are not just responsible for ensuring the assessments that we use are well-constructed, but also for carefully examining the materials we inherit or adopt from other sources. It is easy to assume that a lesson or assessment is effective simply because it has been used before, but educational standards and best practices evolve, and it is crucial to ensure that instructional materials remain relevant and high quality. Some lessons may contain outdated perspectives, assessment methods that do not align with objectives, or instructional approaches that do not engage students in meaningful learning. Using tools like the Virginia Quality Criteria Review Tool can help determine whether a lesson/assessment should be modified, replaced, or used as-is. This process ensures that both formative and summative assessments truly measure student understanding rather than just checking for memorization.
I found the Virginia Quality Criteria Review Tool to be a useful jumping off point when evaluating previously made lessons/assessments. Have you come across any challenges when revising or replacing inherited lesson plans and assessments? Is there a way to ensure that we’re using high-quality instructional materials without constantly having to reinvent the wheel? Are there small modifications that could make a big impact?
Thanks for reading! Let’s continue the conversation in the comments!
-Emily