Author: Sabrina Borneff

Is it Appropriate

I felt like I sort of knew what to expect walking into the theater because I had been working on different characters costumes and had a faint idea about the plot of the story. I was wrong. The story and the way the cast brought it to life was much more violent and personal then I had imagined. I also didn’t expect the characters to have such a deep history with one another before the play even started. The emotions that came up for me the most throughout the play were shock, uncomfortableness, surprise, and relatability. I found that the very beginning of the play felt forced and that the characters weren’t real, but when they started arguing I felt like they were really living in the play. The reactions to the pictures were interesting especially the sense of denial we felt from Tony. She didn’t want to believe that her father had anything to do with those pictures or racism. It showed a realistic perspective of the reactions people may have to finding out they were connected to the actions of the racists in the south.

I also found the children’s reactions to the pictures very interesting. They weren’t nearly as disgusted by them as the adults had been and Cassidy, the teenage girl, seemed more curious about how much they were worth then what they even meant. I wonder if this is because of ignorance or because they children are less connected to the past and feel like they can just ignore it. Also in relationship to our class, they talked about how there was a graveyard behind the back of the house and how the tombstones is what they were tripping over. And that there was also a slave graveyard down by the lake but how its hard to find because there are no markings for it. This relates directly back to our class and I found it interesting that the play write chose to include that specific detail.

Talking Through Movement

My preliminary questions to Camille were, what is your artistic process and how do you come up with the steps that you perform? After getting to hear Camille A. Brown speak and see her company perform this question became a little less foggy. In the discussion that took place in the library Camille was asked a similar question and responded by saying how she does a lot of talking with her dancers about the subject of the piece and then starts giving them movement. An element to Camille’s process that I found extremely interesting was when she said that she has her dancers do a phrase up to 12 different times so she can see which she likes best. What came across through her talk and the performance was that she wanted the performance to feel real. Every dancer had a personality and were working off each other on stage, this is something that I found unique to Camille.

Camille A. Brown’s work is social dance which embodies deep emotions and brings difficult subject matters in front of diverse audiences. Her stories are told through the black experience which is also educational for those of us who don’t experience that. She is unapologetic in her pieces which gives them a voice that other forms of communication don’t display. She uses movement as a language and sees her pieces often as a conversation which is new for me. The way she uses rhythm and voice in her pieces is very stylistic and is something not often brought into other styles of dance.

Another aspect that makes social dance so powerful, is that it teaches large diverse crowds about topics that are uncomfortable and otherwise hard to voice. It softens the blow while also being very impactful with a message that sticks with you after the performance. This is what I hope to bring to the Brother Gabriel performance. That we make the audience think about the underlying issues that have caused the lack of recognition to the burial ground and the history that rests within.

A question that came up for me during the performance was if the performance feels different to the dancers depending on the audience that is watching the performance?

The Art of Digital Storytelling

The first digital story that I focused on was the one about Harvey Milk. I feel that through this video I learned a lot about both Harvey Milk and the Castro street community. From a video perspective I feel like it had both strong and very weak aspects. The beginning drew in my attention and I liked that my eyes had something to follow, but as it went on it became more disorganized. The story started getting harder to follow and understand when the second voice started narrating. The volume levels of the two sections did not match, making me miss part of the story as I adjusted the volume. There was also a part of the video where the pictures and audio didn’t line up; in the section they were talking about Milk’s life, but they were showing newspaper articles about his death. And then at the end the absence of visual content confused me and pulled my thoughts away from the story being told. I was unsure if it was a creative choice by the students or if something was broken. As I create my digital story, I would like to include matching visuals to my audio throughout the entirety of the video, this way it is engaging and easier to follow.

The other digital story that I want to comment on was Sitting Pretty: Benches of Hollywood Cemetery. I feel as though the content within the story was matched accurately with the video which I really liked because it gave the content more depth. I also enjoyed the mixture between self taken videos and authentic pictures from the cemetery’s history. Her voice was calm and clear making it easy to listen and pay attention, I hope to sound similar when I create my digital story. The transitions between the different content areas in her script were smooth and not forced and this also goes for the visuals she used. Although I can’t say I found this story particularly interesting, I did feel like it was engaging and that I learned a little more about the benches in Hollywood Cemetery.

400 Years of Injustice

After having heard Free Egunfemi talk about her mission of exposing the stories of African American history in a way that the museums and government organizations won’t I went into the exhibition with a bit of a new mindset. One that made me question what part of history was on display and what had been tucked away to be forgotten. The way the exhibit had been curated into four section based on the timeline of events made it easy for me to follow even though it was a little cheesy. The first half of it felt like I was walking through the pages of a text book. The second half where it became more interactive and showed the stories of real people and their effect on history was much more engaging to me although I still felt them lacking in some realism.

I feel like for the first two sections that were farther in the past they could have focused the attention on less individuals and dug deeper into their stories, maybe even connecting them to present day Richmond in some way. The fact that there is so much history involving African Americans in Richmond alone and very little of this was expressed through Determined was disappointing. They didn’t even mention Brother Gabriel although he is a great part of Richmond’s history. I feel like we are lucky to have an organization like Untold RVA to bring these stories to the light.

I like to think of American history as a whole, rather than African American History because this makes it seem less relevant and like a part that can be avoided. After leaving the museum I was curious to see if the exhibit was permanent or if it was just temporary, and disappointingly, I found it to be temporary, closing this March. Although it was missing things, I feel like it still started some needed discussions to a broader audience and the fact that an American history museum doesn’t commemorate the stories of African Americans is like leaving out a major part of history. I have recently learned through a different class that in all of Germany there is not a single statue or museum commemorating the Nazis. All Holocaust memorials focus on the victims and the thousands killed. There are also laws that have been passed, making sure that schools continue to teach the Nazi time in depth making sure not to leave the worst parts out. Whereas, America has statues that continue to praise confederate leaders, and has forgotten the names of many important slaves and African Americans over the years. Relating this back to the exhibit, I feel like the way history has been represented was through eyes that are ashamed of what happened and because of this focused more on the positive aspects or just grazed the surface of the injustice, omitting much of the struggle that these people had to endure.

The section I found the most interesting and powerful was at the very end where there was the family tree that had the family names of many of the Richmond families, it was cool to see how interconnected everything is. I also liked how the last bit was interactive and you could see other people’s reactions to the exhibit. I do feel as though they made the ending of the exhibit a bit too joyful because yes, although we have made it very far in the 400 years of injustice, the fight for equality and against racism in the US is still going on, and that should not be overlooked.

Questions that came up for me while I was walking through the exhibit was first, if this is the only section of the museum that focuses on the struggle and self-determination of African Americans? And like I mentioned before if it is a permanent installation? I’m glad that although the museum is lacking in telling the stories of African Americans in Richmond that there are people such as Free who are lifting this part of history up through Untold RVA.

Gabriel Week: Exposure to the Past

The Gabriel Week event that took place at the African Burial Ground and the site of the Richmond Gallows activated the space through dance, music, and theater. Those organizing the event truly believed it is their mission to honor and lift those spirits and ancestors that preside in the African Burial Grounds and through this belief they also engaged the audience. It became a performance piece with everyone in attendance engaged and actively commemorating the space through movement. We started by cleansing ourselves; rubbing herb water on ourselves while saying, “wash me, cleanse me, make me rich.” Then we participated in a march along the side of the burial ground and the gallows all the way up to the sign acknowledging Brother Gabriel’s murder in 1800 at the gallows. We then finished the march facing the Gallows for a passionate and powerful telling of Brother Gabriel’s story. Shortly after we watched a commemorative dance performed on the green and then settled around smoking herbs and candles to meditate. What surprised me most about this event was how much audience participation was required and that everyone that was present participated as they were able. It showed a sense of community that is hard to build and nurture. The audience consisted of both young and old members and although the majority was African American there were also a significant number of Caucasian members as well. Although we may have all come from different backgrounds, we were all connected by our engagement with the history that had taken place where we stood. One of the most inspiring aspects of the night was marching beside a stranger in search for justice. It’s something that I had never experienced before but knowing we were all there with a united goal made it feel like we were making an impact.


New Faces

Going into the class I was nervous about who we would be working with and how the differences in our schools would affect the class. Many of these concerns were wiped away when MK Abadoo introduced herself and the concept of having agreements for the class. I feel like the agreements were a way to see what aspects of the class were important to everyone. It was also nice to voice our opinions without judgment and have clear guidelines of what is acceptable in the class. This was the first time I have done something like this in class. I also feel like it closed the gap a bit between the Richmond and VCU students. The agreements started building an inclusive and creative class culture which was furthered by the warm-up that came next. I found the warm-up to also be a great icebreaker activity where we had to both express ourselves through words and movement. When we had to introduce ourselves as the person that inspires us it was interesting to see a bit of everyone’s’ background. Later when we talked about the purpose of the class and why we were all gathered here it was nice to know we are all working toward the same common goal even if where are from different places. While we went over how the class would run, I did have some logistical questions, but these were answered later. I expect this class to be full of surprises and new experiences and I can’t wait to face them with the support of my classmates and professors.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén