Transportation Plan

BY SHARON TULLY
STAFF WRITER
THE CAPITAL NEWS SERVICE

The Senate Finance Committee voted 9-6 to pass a transportation plan that calls for a 5 percent increase on gas tax.

The bill, sponsored by Sen. H. Russell Potts Jr., R-Clarke, killed the Republican transportation compromise, something many top lawmakers are not happy about.

Senate Majority Leader Walter A. Stosch, R-Goochland, was among the six legislators to vote against the plan, which would implement a 5 percent increase per dollar on gasoline and allow local taxes in traffic-congested areas such as Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads to be raised in order to fund other transportation projects.

Stosch was not available for comment, but his spokesman, Scott Leake said the
senator was clearly disappointed in the outcome.

"He worked for months on the compromise that could be successful," Leake said, "so consequently it is a disappointment."

The plan must survive the Virginia Senate, before which Leake hopes there will be another chance to resurrect the compromise, he said.

"What we've seen is the further into the legislative session you go, sometimes it becomes more apparent what can and can't succeed," Leake said. "There's a hope that those who voted against the compromise plan and for the more comprehensive plan might come to recognize that this is not realistic."

The major difference in the plans, in addition to the tax increase, is the dependency upon the general fund, which provides funding to public education, safety, and health care.

Sen. Thomas K. Norment Jr., R-Gloucester, the sponsor of the House-Senate compromise, warned that the House of Delegates would kill any plan that called for gas tax increase. The compromise avoided a statewide tax increase by calling for $250 million a year from the general fund, whereas the Senate plan would only use about $66 million.

"This is a rough time to talk about raising prices at the pump," Leake said. "People are extremely sensitive about it."

Posted in Virginia Assembly | Comments Off on Transportation Plan

Red Lights

BY DANIEL CUMMING
STAFF WRITER
THE CAPITAL NEWS SERVICE

Local governments would be allowed to use cameras to catch drivers that run red lights under a bill sponsored by Sen. John Watkins, R-Goochland.

The bill, SB871, has already passed in the Senate and will be sent to the House of Delegates for voting there.

If it passes the House, localities would be able to install cameras at some traffic signals to take pictures of the license plates of cars that go through red lights so that a ticket can be issued through the mail.

"People don't understand, whenever you have an accident [in an intersection] you tie up the traffic in both directions," Watkins said.

A fine for $50 would be sent in the mail to the registered owner of an offending vehicle, but no points would be added to the owner's license because it would not be a criminal charge.

Goochland Sheriff Jim Agnew could only think of four intersections with traffic signals in Goochland, but said he likes the idea of the cameras.

"Anything we can do to make things safer I think most law enforcement officers are for it," Agnew said.

Even though a picture of a license plate is not enough for criminal charges, the fine should be "enough to deter," he said.

The bill passed in the Senate on Jan. 29 with a 30 – 10 vote. Opponents of the bill say that it would impose on people's privacy, Watkins said.

Another objection is the possibility of abusing the system by turning it into a money making machine.

"I think they [the localities] are very happy to collect those fines," said Sen. Frank Ruff, R – Halifax, who voted against the bill.

When asked about the possibility of abuse, Watkins said, "Absolutely not. [The bill] is very specific; it says very clearly there is to be no association between number of tickets given and income."

Ruff said having it would be more efficient to have officers patrol against redlight runners. The courts could impose the highest fine and make an example of those caught, acting as a deterrent, he said.

"Word can get around," Ruff said. "I think people's behaviors can be changed this way."

Localities would pay for the installation and maintenance of the cameras themselves, without help from the state.

Before starting or expanding the monitoring system, localities are required to alert the public through an awareness program.

"I just hope that it passes [the House] because it will go a long way to reduce congestion and help prevent accidents," Watkins said.

Posted in Virginia Assembly | Comments Off on Red Lights

Predators

BY DAN PETTY
STAFF WRITER
THE CAPITAL NEWS SERVICE

RICHMOND – The Internet, long considered an anonymous safe haven for sexual predators, may be harder for them to exploit if a bill sponsored by Del. Robert Hurt, R-Chatham, passes through the Virginia General Assembly.

The bill, HB 2749, would require sexual offenders convicted in Virginia to register their e-mail addresses and instant messenger screen names with a local law enforcement agency, which would then forward the information to the Virginia State Police. Changes to e-mail addresses or other Internet communication names by a sex offender must be reported to a parole officer or the State Police within 30 minutes, by the bill's provisions.

The House Appropriations Committee unanimously approved the bill Friday, 23- 0, and reported it to the House floor, where it must be passed before Feb. 6, the final day the House can consider its own legislation. A similar measure was unanimously approved by a Senate committee last week.

"I come from an area where I don't think there's a great deal of awareness about what kids are doing online, and I think it's probably like that across the Commonwealth," Hurt said. "People really need to know about sexual predators, and many recognize that this is a terrifying danger."

Hurt's bill is part of a broader campaign by Virginia Attorney General Robert McDonnell to crack down on sexual predation in Virginia. His "Safe Kids Initiative," launched during the 2006 General Assembly session, aims to drastically reform the way Virginia monitors, incarcerates and treats sexual predators that prey on children, according to his Web site.

"This bill will have a significant effect on making children safer," Hurt said. "Obviously we want to enhance the penalties for the people who do this. I'm convinced that you can't fix these folks. You've got to punish them and get them off the streets for as long as you can. That's the only solution."

During the 2006 legislation session, Hurt sponsored House Bill 1014, which prohibited Web sites from charging people to view child pornography over the Internet. Hurt was a member of McDonnell's Youth Internet Safety Task Force, which visited the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children in Alexandria, Va., and watched a demonstration by a State Police officer, who posed as a teenager in a chat room.

"It was remarkable how quickly the officer had people, who identified themselves as grown men, requesting his age, gender, location and a photograph," Hurt said. "That was bone-chilling to me."

Hurt said the bill would allow the State Police to monitor, in cooperation with Internet service providers, the behavior of convicted sexual offenders on the Internet. Predators found to be on certain Web sites would be kicked off and reported to the State Police for a sex offender registry violation.

Sex offenders are required to re-register with the police every 90 days.

"I think everybody would agree that Internet is a fantastic," Hurt said. "But there's so much anonymity, so many dark places, and so many ways for these people to get right into your home. If you've got children who are talking innocently to people online, you can see how something very terrible can happen."

Besides increasing efforts to track sexual offenders, HB 2749 comprehensively rewrites the laws regarding the possession and production of child pornography.

Sentences for violating this part of the bill carry prison terms between one and 40 years, with mandatory minimum imprisonment ranging from five years to 25 years, depending on the violation and whether it was a repeat offense.

The bill defines child pornography as sexually explicit visual material with a person less than 18 years old, and further clarifies that a person who is depicted, in a sexually explicit way, to be less than 18 years of age, is presumed to be less than 18.

Seven other delegates, including Terry Kilgore, R-Gate City, and David Albo, RFairfax, are listed as co-patrons and supporters for the bill.

But some people, like University of Richmond computer science professor Douglas Szajda, believe that from a technological standpoint, the law is ineffective.

"There's an assumption here that e-mail addresses or IM addresses are difficult to get, or that it's easy to say an e-mail address belongs to a particular person," said Szajda, an expert on computer security. "That can be very hard to do."

"You can send e-mail to anyone and from anyone. So effectively this bill is using e-mail as an authenticator and that's always a bad idea."

While the bill may not effectively limit sexual predation on the internet, Szajda said it provides prosecutors in Virginia a tool to further punish sex offenders who don't register e-mail or instant messenger addresses.

Hurt acknowledged that some sex offenders will evade the law by failing to properly register e-mail addresses and instant messenger screen names.

"The bottom line is, if they get caught, then they can be guilty of probation violations," Hurt said. "And that will put them back in jail before they hurt somebody again. There will be those that get around it, but that's not something we can control."

As for solutions to the problem, legal precedent exists for barring certain people, like computers hackers, from using computers and the Internet. But even these restrictions may not be effective.

"Even if you could put something around predators' houses that prevented them from accessing the Internet, how do you prevent them from accessing it at someone else's house or a library, for instance?" said Szajda, who has two younger children. "I'm not sure of any technological solution to that problem."

Although Internet filtering programs block access to certain Web sites, they cannot prevent children from browsing social networking sites like MySpace.com. The best solution, Szajda said, involves actively monitoring a child's internet use, which he acknowledged was not always what parents want to hear.

"This particular attempt at making the Internet safer is not really going to prevent a whole lot of folks from doing bad things if they want to," he said. "You don't have to be technologically sophisticated to get temporary e-mail addresses or IM addresses, or to get a bunch of them."

Posted in Virginia Assembly | 1 Comment

Capital Punishment

BY LAUREN ANNE MERKEL
STAFF WRITER
THE CAPITAL NEWS SERVICE

Hanover Republican Del. Frank Hargrove represents a party and part of the state that generally supports capital punishment.

He doesn't.

"The death penalty is inappropriate," he said.

He wasn't always so convinced, but he did have misgivings early on.
"When I came down here originally, in '82, I was uneasy about capital punishment at that time," Hargrove said.

Although there were numerous times that he voted in favor of the death penalty,
Hargrove said he "never felt good about it."

Hargrove recollected a time when he saw a picture of people eating their lunch while attending a public hanging. The picture has stayed in his memory through all of this time, which is part of the reason why he said he called for a bill in the mid 1980s to reinstitute public hangings. He felt that capital punishment in general was not enough of a deterrent, and making it public would be.

The bill did not go anywhere, and after that he continued, "unfortunately," he said, to support capital punishment legislation.

"I was warned it would be political suicide," Hargrove said when he finally decided he just didn't like it, and wanted it changed.

"It turns out there were no political consequences for me, personally," he said.

Each year, Hargrove submits bills to the General Assembly to revoke capital punishment, but each year they are killed. The same thing happened this year.

Hargrove believes that within the next four to five years, "we will see the death penalty done away with in Virginia." He said that the death penalty is being "chipped away" all over the country.

Hargrove said thinks there is a huge possibility of executing the wrong person, which makes him uncomfortable. Other legislators agree with him, he said, but they are concerned about the political consequences.

Hargrove prefers jail without parole, and voted in favor of House Bill Number
1311, which would add to the definition of capital murder, which includes eligibility for the death penalty.

Del. Chris Peace, R- Mechanicsville, also voted in favor of this bill, which passed the House. His reasoning is that people do not respect the laws and law enforcement, and that they should receive severe penalties. His wish is that society would not commit crimes to warrant the death penalty.

Peace said that he could see where Hargrove was coming from and respects that.

"Until there is an alternative" regarding how to improve upon the current system, this is the way it is, said Peace.

Jeff Caruso, the executive director of the Virginia Catholic Conference, said, "VCC's [Virginia Catholic Conference] position is that we believe that use of the death penalty is never needed in our Commonwealth."

According to Catholic teachings, Caruso said the death penalty "can only be justified when non-lethal means are insufficient to protect society."

Caruso said because Virginia has "state-of-the-art prison systems" and life without parole for people convicted of murder, capital punishment is not needed. He said that legislators are "applying the accelerator (to capital punishment) when what they need to do is apply the brake."

According to Caruso and the Death Penalty Information Center website, Virginia has the most executions, behind Texas, since 1976, when the United States Supreme Court reinstated capital punishment.

Posted in Virginia Assembly | Comments Off on Capital Punishment

Sex offenders

BY CHRISTOPHER YATES
STAFF WRITER
THE CAPITAL NEWS SERVICE

RICHMOND – Sex offenders will have to register their email-addresses and
instant messenger screen names under legislation unanimously approved by the state Senate last week.

Supporters say Virginia is the first state in the country to introduce such legislation. Sen. Ryan T. McDougle, R-Mechanicsville, is the chief patron of the bill, SB
1071, "This changes the way we define child predators and punishment," McDougle said. "It will help prevent sex offenders from getting to our children."

Although the original bill included only e-mail, it was broadened to include instant messaging in order to encompass the evolving nature of the internet.

"If you are a sex offender and do not register and are found online," McDougle said, "you will be guilty of a new crime."

According to McDougle, MySpace.com agreed to delete accounts of sex offenders so that they could not be given the opportunity to be put into a position to interact with children.

Sexual predators have been getting a great deal of media attention. The attention,
McDougle says, has helped gain support for the electronic registry.

As the internet grows in popularity, the amount of crimes is also increasing. As a prosecutor in the 1990s, McDougle said that he saw the beginnings of crimes against juveniles on the internet but that they were hard to prosecute. With new laws such as the sex offender electronic registry, the law is catching up to the predators.

"Being able to track IMs and chat names will be very useful," he said.

Del. Robert J. Wittman, R-Montross, said that it is important to protect citizens by not putting sex offenders back into situations where there is concern.

"It is important to take a strong step by putting controls in place," Wittman said.
Creating new laws governing the internet has been growing over the past several years. Wittman said that the General Assembly puts measures in place in order to see how they will work.

"If issues arise with these new measures, legislation will follow," Wittman said.
"We must evaluate effectiveness and see if additional controls are necessary."

According to Wittman, the legislation will make the public aware of the ongoing fight against sex predators as well as not allow sex offenders where they might offend again.

Other bills have been introduced regarding sex offenders during the current General Assembly session. These include not allowing sex offenders on school grounds except for special circumstances and clarifying offenses for which an offender must be registered.

Posted in Virginia Assembly | Comments Off on Sex offenders

Michael Goodwin

By Billy Finn

A voice rumbles through the dimly-lit hallway leading to the dressing rooms beneath the stage of the Alice Jepson Theatre. It is a deep and clear baritone, reciting vocal exercises and running lines for tonight's dress rehearsal of "Amadeus." The words seem unintelligible.

The voice belongs to Michael Goodwin, this season's Equity artist-in-residence at the University of Richmond. He is starring as Antonio Salieri in "Amadeus," as well as teaching a course in acting.

Goodwin has been offering his talent and services to the University for several years and has performed in UR productions of "Gypsy," "All my Sons" and "Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?" Fortunately for him, his acting credits go far beyond the stage of the Alice Jepson Theatre.

Though you wouldn't necessarily recognize him on the street, Goodwin has made a successful living as a working actor. Since high school, he has traveled throughout the country, performed in repertory companies, Broadway shows, television and film. He has worked with everyone from less talented theater students to award-winners Anthony Hopkins and Clint Eastwood.

He has been on TV shows such "Law and Order" and "St. Elsewhere" and in movies including the recent "New World."

Goodwin is a man teetering on the edge of obscurity and fame, although that is not what interests him. Tucked in the corner of the men's dressing room in the Modlin Center running lines and waiting for the costumers to finish the alterations on his pants,
Goodwin is focused on his character, his work and his job as a professional actor.
Life as an actor is never easy and Goodwin admits that luck and chance play an unfortunately large part in the business.

"You go to New York these days and unless you're plugged in with a major agent, you're going to have a tough time," he said.

Every actor's journey is different, he said. Each artist must struggle to create a life for himself and to decide how important that art really is. For Goodwin, he made that decision longer ago than he will admit and has never looked back since.

Born in Virginia, Minn., Goodwin moved with his parents to Seattle at an early age.
While attending Ballard High School in Seattle "some time during the 50's," he came across Earl Kelly, the school's drama teacher.

Kelly instilled the actor's passion in Goodwin and became, as Goodwin describes it, "one of those great inspirational types." Kelly taught Goodwin and his peers the basics of acting and turned the group into a sort of miniature repertory company.

After high school, Goodwin enrolled at the University of Washington and began studying theatre there. Shortly after, however, Goodwin realized he didn't see eye-to-eye with the school's theatre department and dropped out.

Goodwin's departure from school coincided with his enlistment in the Air Force.
"I got a notice for a physical for the Army," he said. "This was during Vietnam and so I enlisted in the Air Force."

Goodwin's plan was to serve in the Air Force before moving to England to study and try his luck as an actor overseas.

Before leaving for service, Goodwin heard that the Seattle Repertory Company was auditioning for new members. Quickly, he went back to Earl Kelly and asked him if he should audition.

"[Kelly] didn't tell me what to do," he said. "But, he did tell me €˜don't come back in 20 years and complain to me about how you never auditioned.' So I went."

Stewart Vaughn, then the director of the company, auditioned Goodwin and was impressed with the young actor's work.

"He asked me where I had studied and I said, €˜Ballard High School,'" Goodwin remembered with a laugh. "He said, €˜no, I mean what conservatories have you worked in?' I said, €˜I haven't really worked anywhere.' He couldn't believe that."

Shortly after, Vaughn offered him the job, a job which Goodwin had to decline.

"I told him I had enlisted in the Air Force and was leaving the country for at least a year,"
Goodwin said. "He threw me out of the theatre and told me never to waste his time again."

A week after getting thrown out of the theatre, Goodwin got a call from Vaughn, who apologized and told the kid to keep in touch when he got back in the country.

After a year of service in the Air Force, Goodwin returned to Seattle and Vaughn quickly added him to the company.

"I never did get to England," Goodwin said. "I got the job and went to work right away."

Goodwin worked steadily with the company for a short time before leaving with Vaughn for New Orleans early in 1966, where he earned membership in the Actor's Equity Association, the national actor's union. After a year in New Orleans, Vaughn matched Goodwin with an agent in New York City.

The agent, Sean Cistene, put Goodwin to work as soon as he got to New York in the spring of 1967. The fledgling actor's first TV gig was on Walt Disney's Wide World of Color.

"I never stopped to think if I was getting in easy or what was going on," Goodwin said.
"I just figured €˜that's the way it is.'"

Goodwin's career in the City from 1967 to 1992 was a steady rise from summer stock theatre to residences at repertory companies to off-Broadway and some Broadway productions and finally to television and film.

Since 1967, Goodwin has been engaged in what he calls the "agent dance." Since Cistene's retirement, the actor has had six or seven agents in his career.

"It's all part of it," Goodwin noted after struggling to remember his latest agent's name.
"These days I'm so far off the path being down here in Virginia that they're not working too hard for me. Every once in a while I'll get a call. They have nothing to lose by keeping me around."

Goodwin's first expedition to LA was in 1974. In six months, he had managed to grab one part, a small recurring role in the well-known series "Kojak," before returning to New York disillusioned.

Back in New York, Goodwin landed a recurring role on the popular soap opera "Another World." Though some actors scoff at the time they had to spend on soaps, Goodwin remembers his almost two-year stay on the show with satisfaction.

"Working on soaps is pretty exhausting," he said. "We shot those shows like it was live theatre. It was the first show of its kind to run for an hour and we were mostly Broadway actors working on this thing. It was a good bunch of people and we had fun with it."

Goodwin said that first experiences with television is the reason why he feels a course on the subject is so important and one that he is happy to teach at UR.

"I almost tossed my cookies the first time I saw myself on film because I thought I was so over-the-top," he said with a laugh. "So I really had to edit myself and sort of €˜earn while you learn.'"

Goodwin said that the show itself required so much rehearsal and work that most of the film actors quit, leaving only the Broadway actors, who were used to the pressures of a live show.

"We shared the tape machine for that show with the evening news," he said. "I think in about a half a year of taping the show we maybe stopped filming three or four times in that entire span. It was a great training school for me."

By 1978, Goodwin had begun to make LA a regular stop again. He landed a role on the new series "Strike Force," a police drama, in 1981. The show only lasted a year and afterward Goodwin found himself bouncing around roles in some of the famous 80's TV series such as "Remington Steele," "Magnum PI" and "Dynasty."

During his time in LA, Goodwin abandoned the stage. For six years, he devoted his energy to TV and some film before finally returning to New York in 1991 to a production of "Betrayal" at the Longwharf Theatre. The production received critical praise and renewed in Goodwin a love for live theatre.

After the show's six-month run ended, Goodwin got an offer from Theatre Virginia in Richmond to do the play "Other People's Money." Though Goodwin thought his stay in Richmond would last as long as the show's run, he immediately fell in love with the town.
After a year's residency at Theatre Virginia, Goodwin found himself without a job when the company was forced to close in 1992. Left without steady work, he relied on a "fair amount of film work" during the 90's that came through the area.

"I had always planned to go back to New York," he said. "But I kept getting these film roles around here and my wife and I just sort of settled in here."

After a few years of living and working in Richmond, Goodwin was contacted by the University of Richmond and was asked to take part in a pioneering program at the school.
Dr. Dorothy Holland, a retired actor now serving as an associate professor of theatre at UR, remembers her first encounter with Goodwin.

"I first met Michael in 1999 at a departmental meeting," she said. "That was my first year at UR so we both had that "new-guy" sensibility. I liked him immediately."
In addition to his affable personality and sharp sense of humor, Holland was impressed by Goodwin's intense professionalism and extensive talent.

Goodwin and another working actor, Irene Zeigler, were the first Equity artists in UR's history to assume residencies at the university. In 1999, the pilot program began with the two actors teaching courses in acting basics and performing in the school's productions of "Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf" and "All My Sons."

"We were the guinea pigs," he said. "Me and Irene. That show ["Virginia Woolf"] ate us alive, man."

Holland remembered Goodwin's work that first year with admiration.

"He just nailed his role in "Virginia Woolf,"' she said. "That spring I directed "All My Sons" and Michael played the father. [He] brought such breadth and integrity."

Goodwin returned to UR three years ago and performed in "Gypsy" while teaching basics of acting and acting for the camera.

"I was thrilled to be able to teach that class," he said. "There's such a huge difference between the two mediums. In film, everything's scaled down and you really have to work off yourself and trust yourself."

Goodwin spoke passionately about the need for the course and how well UR students have received it both times he has taught it.

"The kids here really pitch in and make it a lot of fun," he said. "This issue certainly has to be addressed because two-thirds of the stuff you're going to go audition for is in TV and film. Stage has diminished greatly and I continue to be impressed by these kids' ability to jump in and switch gears like that."

UR junior Sean Hudock took the course this spring and starred alongside Goodwin in Amadeus as the title character.

"At first, I was very intimidated by him," Hudock said. "He was built up as this big-time actor and he has that voice. The first time we met, he congratulated me on my work in the production of "The Great Tennessee Monkey Trial" earlier in the semester and said that he was proud of me.

"That was when I realized what he was about. He is so nurturing of young artists and just so supportive. He challenges you to trust yourself and grow and I think every person in that class this year came away with a lot from him."

Goodwin's journey is in some ways the journey all actors must take and Goodwin is more than happy to give some hard-earned advice.

As for his own career, Goodwin doesn't have much planned at the moment.

"We'll see what becomes available for me," he said. "Even though you never retire in this business, I kind of see myself winding down a bit. Part of me wants to work my way back to New York and start building some credit with my agent again. Who knows?

"You get used to the lifestyle down here," he continued. "I mean, look at this spring we've got down here right now. The beat goes on. I preach to these kids about selling themselves and getting out there so I probably should follow my own advice."

Though the instability and pressure of life as an actor would scare most away, Goodwin seems to relish it.

"Like I tell these kids, if this is what you want, do whatever you can," he said. "That's the life of an actor."

Posted in Features | Comments Off on Michael Goodwin

Home sweet dorm

By Laurel Merkel 

Room 134 Thomas Hall, also labeled Suite 129, is a rowdy room. People are always going in and out. You can hear laughter and shouting coming from their windows at all times of the day. Posters of mountain landscapes decorate the cream walls, and sheets cover the couches. It is a typical dorm room, just a little bigger. But it would have to be€¦for the home of the Mayes family.

Had you ever wondered who the little children are that play around Whitehurst?

Or who gets the special "reserved" parking spots outside of Weinstein Hall?

Dr. Rick Mayes, a political science professor, and his wife Jennifer have been living in Thomas Hall for four years as part of a program on campus called the College Fellow Program. Their two sons – Tim, 5, and Ben, 2 – are part of the Mayes mix in the hall.

"Ben's a pure €˜Thomasite'," said Mayes. "He knows nothing else." Tim, the eldest child, was born in California while Mayes was teaching at Berkeley. Mayes graduated from the University of Richmond in 1991 and was an adjunct instructor here from 1999-2000.

Mayes said the family moved into Thomas because they "were broke. Berkeley was expensive."

Steve Bisese, the university's vice president for student development, said the College Fellow Program was designed to have Mayes be available for students and to plan programs.

"He's [Mayes] a great guy- students appreciate that," said Bisese. "He opens himself up outside of the classroom€¦everyone knows him."

And his children.

"They live right beneath me; you can hear them [the children] yell," said Phil Colon, a sophomore. Colon said, "It's a tease" when he can smell the Mayes' family cooking waft up through his windows on the second floor. Will Bradley, another sophomore who lives in Thomas Hall said, "I figure we must bother them more than they bother us."

Jennifer Mayes said they couldn't really hear people in the dorm. Rick Mayes agreed, and thinks their family must be the loudest group that lives there. Even so, there are perks for students. For example, Bradley said he enjoys playing with the kids' toys that get left out.

"It's been a terrific experience for them and for the students," said Dr. Catherine Bagwell, a psychology professor who co-teaches Mental Health and Policy with Mayes.

Bagwell met Mayes about four years ago, the summer that Mayes returned to Richmond.
She said that he is a "real engaged, smart, fun person" and that he has planned some wonderful events and built strong relationships.

"It's a win-win situation for everybody," Bagwell said.

Another colleague of Mayes is Dr. Jennifer Erkulwater, who was hired the same year as Mayes. Erkulwater said that Mayes called her up to say hello because he thought they might be colleagues.

"It was a sweet gesture," said Erkulwater, who later said that she found out that "that was typical of him."

"It's neat to have a professor like that€¦students are very lucky," she said.

A professor living in a college dorm is a good idea, according to Erkulwater. She thinks it is great for students to see that their professors are people, too.

"It allows professors to get to know their students and vice-versa," she said.

Besides getting to know students, another aspect that Mayes thinks is great is that he does not have to worry about maintenance, whereas Erkulwater will occasionally gripe about her roof leaking.

Mayes said that the minute they moved in, they loved it, especially his commute every morning (just across the road). Mayes said that he gets a lot of time with students and family. He just got back from a trip to Chicago with seven of his students. They were visiting and researching Hope Meadows, a world-famous foster care home, and Children’s Memorial Hospital. Mayes also holds book discussions in his home.

"This is what Jefferson wanted at UVA- to be close," he said. Oxford and other schools have similar systems, he said, where professors live the same way that their students do. He feels that he can teach better if he knows his students better.

"The campus is a really nice place for the kids," said Mayes.

The ease of finding a babysitter, the laundry facilities, the commute to work, and no maintenance worries: how many more perks could there possibly be? There are plenty more. The Mayes family knows when there will be scheduled fire alarms. They have air conditioning whenever they want it, free utilities, UR cable, a big kitchen with a table overlooking the bell tower, their own bathroom, and a coffee shop close to their home.

They are also surrounded by activity at all times. Mayes likes living in Thomas Hall, but said that it would be quite different if it were Gray Court, a freshman boys' dorm.

Mayes said it is funny to hear students on their cell phones. He sometimes can't believe all that is said. He also gets a kick out of the drunken students that come back from the row and other social events at night.

Change is coming, though, next year. Mayes said that five years is the maximum amount of time that they will stay.

"I can't live here forever, unfortunately," he said. "Five years€¦time to grow up."

Posted in Features | Comments Off on Home sweet dorm

Rugby is for women, too

By Mandy Sciacchitano

An old European saying claims that rugby is a "ruffian's sport played by gentlemen."

Well, it's time for the gentlemen to move over and share the spotlight with the women because women are redefining the boundaries of how the sport should be played. Rugby is increasingly gaining popularity as a sport for women, too, and, although many people don't know it, the women's rugby team at University of Richmond is swiftly breaking all of the stereotypes.

The first women's rugby team at Richmond started in the spring of 2003. That's when a group of freshman girls who met during sorority rush week and knew a lot of men's rugby players decided they wanted to try a different sport, said senior Liz Dunham, one of the team's original players.

Dunham said none of the girls knew how to play, but one of Richmond's men's rugby players helped them out.

"We had a student here from the guys' team that had too many concussions, so he was our coach," she said. "He taught us the fundamentals, but you can't really learn rugby through practice, so we had games and scrimmages and learned that way."

The game of rugby is like a combination of American football and soccer, except it is almost completely opposite. The "forwards," who are the offensive players in soccer, are actually the defensive players in rugby, and the "backs," who are the defensive players in soccer, play offense in rugby. More than that, there is one key difference: the ball can only be passed backward.

The field is called a pitch and the ball looks like a football, but fatter, junior Virginia Bunker said.

There are 15 people on the pitch for each team €” eight forwards and seven backs€”and the object of the game is to cross a line (like an end zone in football) and place the ball down to score. Where you place the ball down is where you kick for extra points, junior Kathryn Joyce, president of the women's rugby team, said.

Learning the game of rugby requires learning a new set of vocabulary words.

First, there's the "scrum," which takes place when there is a penalty or when the ball goes out of bounds, Bunker said. In the scrum, the 16 forwards (eight from each team) drive against one another and fight for the ball.

"You basically bind onto each other and bend down real low," Bunker said, "and the ref says €˜Hold. Engage.' and then you push against each other.

"The hooker tries to €˜hook' it with her foot, and you try to push it back with your feet to the scrum half so she can pick it up and get it out."

In addition to "scrum" and "pitch," another important rugby term is "ruck," which is what a team does when its player in possession of the ball is tackled by the other team.

"In order to gain possession again, you have to push against the other team where the ball has been down€”kind of like the line of scrimmage," junior Carrie Dyer said.

"Whoever wins the ruck will gain possession."

Neither male nor female rugby players wear any padding, so players have to be tough in the face of so much contact.

"Football players have it so easy compared to rugby players," said junior Kate Harmon, Bunker's roommate.

Bunker added, "In one of the games a girl fell on the ground and was bleeding from the head €¦ but she's OK now. Stuff like that is pretty common."

Rugby is a physically demanding game, but Joyce said that one of the common misconceptions is that people often get injured.

"It's just a violent game, and if you play it properly no one should get hurt," she said.

"It's aggressive and it's tough physically, but it's not like someone has to get
injured at every game. There's more to the game than just tackling people; there is skill involved."

The physical nature of the game and its male-dominated history leads to another stereotype that plagues the women's rugby team, especially on the Richmond campus.
"The stereotype is that rugby women are manly women €” butches," Bunker said.
"But our team is very feminine. We have a lot of small women."

The women who play rugby at UR are a lot shorter and smaller than the women on other teams. The average size of the team may have something to do with the type of students who attend Richmond.

"At Richmond the stereotype is to be as skinny as possible, which doesn't really help our chances when we go up against 300-pound girls," Joyce said.

But smaller means faster in the world of rugby and the Spiders have learned to use the size disparity to their advantage.

"We are a faster team," Joyce said, "whereas the other girls are bigger and can't run as fast for as long.

"We usually use our speed, quickness and running the ball . . . it works sometimes. During the fall semester we only lost two games."

Coach Rudy Miller, who has been with the team for two years, sees the average size of the team as a positive attribute.

"UR women don’t fit into the classic mold," he said in an e-mail response. "We are generally smaller than many teams, but the girls are faster and fitter than many teams."
Part of the reason that the rugby team is so stereotyped on campus may be because students just don't know a lot about the game. Rugby doesn't have as large of a following in the United States, partly because Americans grow up watching American football.

"It's just cultural differences," Dunham said. "It's what you grow up with. In high school here you don't have a rugby team, but in Europe you can play rugby in middle school, so I guess more people know about it."

According to USA Rugby Online, American football has its origins in rugby. As the popularity of rugby spread throughout North America, each region changed the rules to fit their style of play. Eventually two completely different games emerged: Canadian football and American football. Both resemble rugby, and to this day, some of the official rules derive from those of rugby.

Despite the strong connection to football, rugby is still so relatively unknown in
America that there are no professional teams, Miller said.

"Rugby is structured a lot like soccer," he said. "You have small clubs and large clubs and out of these, clubs players are selected to represent the U.S. internationally."

The first United States women's rugby team to compete internationally, The Eagles, was formed in 1987. It quickly launched itself onto the world circuit as a powerhouse, winning the first official World Cup in 1991. It finished second in the two subsequent World Cups, and the team's official website states that it "set the standard for international competition, leading an ensuing wave of women’s rugby growth and game development worldwide."

Hundreds of colleges nationwide currently boast a women's rugby team, but most are not at varsity level.

The Spiders women's rugby team plays in the Virginia Rugby Union (VRU), which includes school such as William and Mary, Mary Washington, Virginia Commonwealth University, Longwood, Radford and Virginia Tech€”all club teams.

The sport's national organization, USA Rugby, launched a program in 2003 called the USA Rugby College Commitment. According to the USA Rugby web site, the program has the aim of "improving the quality, image and awareness of college Rugby on campuses across America," and is assuming a leadership position at club-level college sports.

Although the program hasn't yet made it to Richmond, the team has launched a campaign to promote itself on campus.

Team members hold information sessions twice a semester for girls who are interested in playing but don't necessarily know what rugby is all about. Members also hang banners in the Commons advertising weekend home games and hang up fliers in the hallways and bathroom stalls all across campus. They also have a couple of fundraisers in the works for the upcoming semester.

"This semester we tried to do a Jello wrestling fundraiser," Joyce said, "and a lot of people heard about it and were going to come out, and that was exciting because it was a lot of people that probably hadn't heard about our team, but were going to come out anyway."

Currently, the biggest advertising asset the team has is word-of-mouth, which also serves to break many of the standing stereotypes about the kind of women who play rugby.

"If you are friends with people who play, you know it's not the stereotypical team," Bunker said. "But if you don't have friends, you'll think that it's just big girls out there beating up on other girls. It's hard to recruit with an image like that."

Through the team's advertising efforts, the Richmond student body is slowly learning more about and embracing the game of women's rugby.

"I think it is pretty well respected," Dyer said, "and I think people look at the girls' team as being pretty unique since rugby is a sport that is so synonymous with guys."

Miller thinks that the team has been gaining respect and popularity thanks to the "fun factor."

"These girls have a blast both on and off the field," he said. "Rugby is something everyone should try. Someone said to me once that rugby is like crack. I guess in some ways I agree. It is a very addictive game."

It must be very addictive if the UR women's rugby team, which doesn't hold tryouts and was non-existent just four years ago, has escalated to be one of the best teams in the conference.

"The girls started off having a general interest in the game and became one of the most competitive teams in their division," Miller said. "They are stronger, faster and are becoming real students of the game."

As a quote on the team's official website reads: “The only trophy we won that day was the blood and sweat we left on the pitch…. and it was enough.”

Posted in Features | 1 Comment

Productivity suffers when students engage in multitasking

By Amy Demoreuille

Despite popular belief, multitasking reduces productivity, with clear implications for workers and college students alike, according to new studies and research reports.

Multitasking occurs "when people are simultaneously performing multiple tasks or rapidly switching between multiple tasks so that it seems that they are performing them at the same time," Shamsi T. Iqbal (cq), a student at the University of Illinois (cq) at Urbana-Champaign (cq) and researcher on multitasking, said. Human beings can naturally multitask if there are no conflicts between the visual, auditory and motor channels, she said.

Multitasking increases performance and efficiency but becomes a problem when people's actions exceed the limitations of their processing resources, she said. "In those cases," she said, "it is postulated that processing resources from one task is usurped from another, potentially resulting in decreased performance for the second task or both."

David E. Meyer (cq), a cognitive scientist and director of the Brain, Cognition and Action Laboratory (cq) at the University of Michigan (cq), has been quoted as saying: "Multitasking is going to slow you down, increasing the chances of mistakes. Disruptions and interruptions are a bad deal from the standpoint of our ability to process information."

Multitasking is "illusory at best," Jonathan B. Spira (cq), chief analyst and CEO at Basex (cq), a business-research firm, said. "The brain doesn't multitask. It is capable of one task at a time."

2

Many people would be wise to curb their multitasking behavior when working in an office, studying or driving a car, neuroscientists, psychologists and management professors say in a recent New York Times (cq) article.

Multitasking is a problem at the University of Richmond (cq) because people think they're better multitaskers than they are, President William E. Cooper (cq), a psychologist, said last week. Multitasking gives people the false impression that they're working effectively and they can't have breakthroughs in their work without full concentration, he said.

Out of 17 Richmond (cq) women interviewed, 14 often multitask while they work and 13 think it negatively affects their work. Two women think that the quality of their work is just as good when they're multitasking, it just takes them longer. The rest agree that they are much more productive and produce better quality work when not multitasking, and when multitasking, work is often "rushed, of poor quality, incomplete and sloppy," sophomore Elizabeth Robinson (cq) said.

Rene Marois (cq), a neuroscientist and director of the Human Information Processing Laboratory (cq) at Vanderbilt University (cq) said in the same New York Times (cq) article: "A core limitation is an inability to concentrate on two things at once.

We are under the impression that we have this brain that can do more than it often can."
Scott Allison (cq), a psychology professor at the University Richmond (cq) says: "We live in a society in which people have the illusion that they can do many things at the same time as well as they can do them separately. The truth is, work performance suffers when people multitask. Not only that, but multitasking can cause stress."

3

In 2005, Glenn Wilson (cq), Reader in Personality at the Institute of Psychiatry (cq), University of London (cq), gave an IQ test to a group of people who were to do nothing but take the test. A second group then took an IQ test while distracted by e-mails and telephones. The first group scored an average of 10 points higher and the second group scored an average of six points lower than a group in a similar study that had been tested after smoking marijuana.

Technology serves as a lubricant and keeps knowledge flowing, but it has increased the variety of ways someone can interrupt or be interrupted, according to a report by Spira (cq) and Joshua B. Feintuch (cq) from Basex (cq).

Everyday in the workplace, workers divert their attention to interruptions and other distractions that consume about 28 percent of a worker's day, or 2.1 hours including recovery time, based on surveys and interviews of workers by Basex (cq). American company workers waste about 28 billion hours a year and assuming a salary of $21/hour, the cost to business is $588 billion, according to a report by Basex (cq).

A recent study of Microsoft (cq) workers found that they took, on average, 15 minutes to return to serious mental tasks after responding to incoming e-mail or instant messages.

About 55 percent of workers respond to an e-mail shortly after it is received and only 30 percent answer when it's convenient, according to research by Basex (cq). Interruptions can be unimportant, urgent or both because many workers can't differentiate, Spira (cq) said. Degrees of interruption include personal importance, group importance and organizational importance, he said. Personal importance is how critical an issue is to an individual, group importance is how critical an issue is to a group, and organizational importance is how critical the issue is to the overall problem, he said.

4

Responding to interruptions is part of human nature, and the most difficult to resist are those that entertain us, he said. Total interruptions, dominant interruptions, distractions and background activities are the four main types of disruptions, he said. Total interruptions, such as an active phone conversation or a thought-intensive game, completely occupy the conscious mind and thwart any thought relevant to the original task, he said.

Dominant interruptions, such as walking outside or recreational web browsing, largely occupy the mind while the task at hand develops in the back of one's mind, he said.

Distractions, such as instant messaging, "do not stop one from consciously working on the original task but do draw attention away from it so it proceeds more slowly or less accurately," he said.

Background activities, such as listening to music, are less-obvious but divert some of one's attention away from the original task and slightly reduce speed and accuracy, he said.

Interruptions can also be passive or active, he said. Passive interruptions are triggered by technology or another person, while active interruptions are "initiated by the very person who chooses to be interrupted by them," he said.

About 94.5 percent of workers consider an interruption by a superior acceptable, 87.2 percent consider an interruption by a colleague acceptable, 90.8 consider an interruption by a subordinate acceptable and 62.4 of workers consider an interruption by a friend for a non-work or non-business related question acceptable, according to a recent survey by Basex (cq).

5

Multitasking shrinks brain capacity instead of enlarging it and people can't multitask and learn new things, Cooper (cq) said. The only way to learn things in depth and be original is to resist multitasking, he said.

Marois (cq) conducted a study with three other Vanderbilt (cq) researchers where they measured how much time is lost when a person tries to handle two tasks at once. They found that when participants were given two tasks at once, their response was delayed up to a second more than when they had to do each task separately. This one-second delay could be fatal while driving 60 mph, Marois (cq) said.

Out of the same 17 Richmond (cq) women interviewed, 15 said they talked on the phone while driving and only two said they talked only when necessary. Three of the women have had cell phone related close-calls and two have actually had serious consequences. Sophomore Colleen Muldoon (cq) leaned over to get her cell phone and almost hit a car, junior Katie Vaska (cq) stalled out while driving stick shift and talking on the phone, and junior Mahima Ratnaswami (cq) has drifted into another driver's lane during a phone conversation, they said.

Senior Catherine Estevez (cq) said once she reached over to get her cell phone when it fell on the floor, "blew right by a speed trap," and received a $200 speeding ticket, she said. Sophomore Jane Crifasi (cq) ran through a red light once while talking on her cell phone, but luckily there wasn't an accident, she said. Other women note that they do stupid things while driving but acknowledge the fact that they may not notice, they said.

6

Many believe that today's youth are the most adept multitaskers, but a study conducted at the Institute for the Future of the Mind (cq) at Oxford University (cq) found that a group of 18-to 21-year-olds and a group of 35-to 39-year-olds matched in speed and accuracy when given a list of images to translate into numbers using code, while they were interrupted by phone calls, instant messages or text-messages.

Some Richmond (cq) women have good strategies for focusing on their homework. "I try to give myself time limits for how long I'll work," Vaska (cq) said.

"I'll work for an hour and a half and then take a break or finish this subject and then do something else. I get a lot more done quicker that way and I tend to stay more focused when I am working."

Listening to music or multitasking a little can be used as "a jolt of caffeine" to get you started working but you should stop multitasking as soon as you start to seriously work, Cooper (cq) said. Multitasking on a basic level, such as walking to the dining hall while talking on your cell phone, is acceptable because one action is automatic while the other requires consciousness, he said.

People should manage the technology that surrounds them when working or driving, such as not listening to music with lyrics, checking e-mail once an hour at most, and not talking on the phone while driving even if using a headset, according to a recent New York Times (cq) article.

Some universities block internet access in certain courses and have other policies that will prevent multitasking, Cooper (cq) said. If multitasking becomes problematic at Richmond (cq), the university could address multitasking in orientation and offer a seminar, he said.

7

People don't know the consequences of multitasking and people can make them aware by discussing and writing about the problem, Spira (cq) said.

Brain scans, social networking algorithms and other new tools should help provide a deeper understanding of the brain's limits and potential and a new organization, the Institution for Innovation and Information Productivity (cq), has been created to sponsor such research, according to the same New York Times (cq) article.

Multitasking has existed since the beginning of time and as time progresses, there are more opportunities to multitask, Cooper (cq) said. People need to be careful how they use the technology available because multitasking is something that could literally affect the evolution of our species, he said.

Kelsey Blank, face-to-face interview
President Cooper, face-to-face interview
Jane Crifasi, e-mail interview (jane.crifasi@richmond.edu)
Catherine Estevez, e-mail interview (catherine.estevez@richmond.edu)
Jen Forde, face-to-face interview
Hayley Fowler, face-to-face interview
Jackie Gunderman, face-to-face interview
Ali Hoffman, e-mail interview (ali.hoffman@richmond.edu)
Aurie Horn, e-mail interview (aurie.horn@richmond.edu)
Shamsi T. Iqbal, e-mail interview (siqbal@uiuc.edu)
Alexandra Jenkins, face-to-face interview
Kathryn Joyce, e-mail interview (kathryn.joyce@richmond.edu)
Colleen Muldoon, e-mail interview (colleen.muldoon@richmond.edu)
Julia E. Nouss, e-mail interview (julia.nouss@richmond.edu)
Mahima Ratnaswami, face-to-face interview
Elizabeth Robinson, face-to-face interview
Allison Scott, e-mail interview (sallison@richmond.edu)
Jonathan B. Spira, e-mail interview (jspira@basex.com)
Caroline Stutts, face-to-face interview
Emily Tiernan, e-mail interview (emily.tiernan@richmond.edu)
Katie Vaska, face-to-face interview
Lohr, Steve. "Slow Down, Brave Multitasker, And Don't Read This in Traffic." The
New York Times, 25 March 2007.

8

Spira, Jonathan B., Goldes David M. "Information Overload: We Have Met the Enemy and He is Us." Basex Report, March 2007.

Spira, Jonathan B., Fientuch, Joshua B. "The Cost of Not Paying Attention: How
Interruptions Impact Knowledge Worker Productivity" Basex Report, September 2005.

Posted in News writing | Comments Off on Productivity suffers when students engage in multitasking

Kiplinger’s Personal Finance Magazine names UR 22nd in the country

By Morgan Walker

The University of Richmond now outranks schools such as Boston College, Johns Hopkins and Cornell on Kiplinger's Personal Finance Magazine's list for the best value in a private university.

Richmond sits in the 22nd spot on the April 2007 list, up 10 spots from the last time the ranking was released in January 2004, Kiplinger's Personal Finance Magazine's associate editor Jane Clark said.

Kiplinger's editors chose the University of Richmond from a pool of more than 1,000 private liberal arts colleges and universities based on academic quality and affordability, according to the magazine's website. When assessing where a school will fall on the list, the editors weigh the two factors as two-thirds for academic quality and one-third for affordability, Clark said.

The assessment of the academic quality involves looking at the university's admissions rate, average SAT and ACT scores, the student-to-faculty ratio and the four and five-year graduation rates, Clark said.

The affordability of the school factors in the total costs of the school, the cost after need-based aid, the need met by the university, aid received from grants, non-needbased aid given to students, and the cost after non-need-based aid, Clark said.

Kiplinger's Personal Finance Magazine is a well-respected ranking and these things help market the school, Richmond's President William Cooper said. "Kiplinger's compares us to major research universities," he said. "To be on the same page as some of those distinguished universities and to outrank them is an honor.

"We are becoming increasingly legitimate as a national university. We are in the hunt and we have to continue the momentum."

This publication will help the university get a certain amount of attention and if you look at all the rankings out there, Richmond is always in the top tier, Richmond's Director of Media ands Public Relations, Brian Eckert, said. "Independent endorsements without our participation always gives us something to market," he said. "And it all contributes."

The University of Richmond responded quickly to the release of Kiplinger's April issue and added this honor into its marketing strategy for prospective students. "We used it on Saturday at an open house," Cooper said.

Although receiving a spot on the list of the top 50 best values in private universities is an honor, no ranking is perfect, Cooper said. But Kiplinger's is pure and legitimate ranking compared to something like Fiske's Guide to Colleges or Princeton Review, he said.

When students choose a university, they are buying a relationship, Cooper said.
Just because a school is in the top 10 of every ranking does not mean it's the school for you, he said.

Parents always tend to focus on the school's ranking compared to other schools, Betty Schneider, Langley High School's career center counselor said. Langley High School is in McLean, Va. Schools create competition by focusing on the rankings, she said.

"Rankings don't help the applicant, they help the school," Schneider said. "My job is to focus on the student's perspective and these rankings just create unbearable competition for the students."

Ranking is a big factor for the parents, Andrea Milam of Lexington, Ky., said.

Milam has two daughters: Lauren, who is a first-year Westhampton College student on a partial dance scholarship through the University Dancers and Ally, who is a junior in high school interested in attending Richmond in the fall of 2008.

"What makes a parent willing to pay $45,000 a year is something like a ranking," Milam said. "It is what pushes it over the edge when compared to other schools. This ranking has been an affirmation that the school is worth the money. It illustrates the school has goals."

Full and partial scholarships through sports and other related activities are not the only ones given out to students at the University of Richmond. One out of every 15 incoming freshman receives the Richmond Scholars Scholarship, which offers full tuition based on merit. Other scholarships come from the Presidential Scholarships, National Merit scholarships and the Bonner Scholars Program, according to the university's website.

What makes the University of Richmond stand out is that it gives more non-need based aid than most of the other school's on the list, Clark said. In fact, Richmond's website says that the university gives financial aid through grants, loans, scholarships and other sources to 65 percent of its students. The university is also one of only 21 of the top 50 universities to guarantee 100 percent of need-based financial aid, according to Kiplinger.com.

First-year Westhampton student, Kelly Behrend of Mount Holly, N.J., is here on a full scholarship through the Bonner Scholars Program. "Bonner Scholars is a merit-based scholarship for community service and need-based financial aid," Behrend said. "Without Richmond's extensive financial aid opportunities, I would not have been able to attend this university.

"Richmond was able to acknowledge my financial need and my merit as an applicant and was able to meet it 100 percent. I am so grateful the university was recognized for the amazing efforts it is making in helping students achieve their academic goals."

In the event of a tie between two or more schools, Kiplinger's assesses the average debt at graduation and the overall quality of the school based on other rankings, Clark said.

Because the school's overall quality is involved with most national rankings, the university is making efforts to improve the quality of life on campus, Jessica Ruzic said.
She is president of the Westhampton Class of 2010. "The Westhampton College Government Association is working hard on creating a livable environment for the students," Ruzic said. "Administration works on making sure this school is affordable and academically strong, whereas we can help by improving the quality of life through projects such as the new Weinstein Center for Recreation and Wellness."

Current students at the University of Richmond put emphasis on Richmond's ranking when applying to graduate programs at other schools, Westhampton College Junior, Alison Andolena, said. "As a junior who is going to be applying to law schools next fall, a ranking that is higher than other well-known schools is definitely a good thing I am going emphasize in my applications," Andolena said. "Hopefully, it is something that will end up helping me."

Richmond is definitely in the running to outrank other schools in the future, Clark said. The university's only weak spots when compared to other schools are the admission rate and the four-year graduation rate, she said.

The University of Richmond admits 47 percent of its applicants each year, giving it the second highest admissions rate in the top 25 schools on the list, according to
Kiplingers.com. Schools such as Harvard University, Columbia University, and
Dartmouth College rank higher on the list and have admissions rates lower that 15 percent, Clark said.

Also, the four-year graduation rate is not as competitive as others, Clark said. If the university can become more competitive in these two fields, the ranking is likely to rise in Kiplinger's Personal Finance Magazine's list of the top 50 Best Values in Private
Universities, she said.

Posted in News writing | Comments Off on Kiplinger’s Personal Finance Magazine names UR 22nd in the country