I agree with the decision to kill Charles I. It wasn’t quite tyrannicide because there was a real government involved and it wasn’t one person randomly doing it. Therefore, I think Parliament would have a better chance of putting someone into power next who wasn’t as bad as Charles I.
The facts show that Charles I was an evil leader and a tyrant. After reading about the “Engagement” I was fully convinced that he deserved to be beheaded. He put his own country under military pressure just to ensure that he could be back as King. This is a great example of doing something for personal benefit, but it harms the public.
Be First to Comment