On Wednesdays, we meet.

On Fridays, we dress casual. On Wednesdays, we meet. Every Wednesday, at 9:30am, the Biocom office has a stand up meeting at the watering hole- the kitchen and dinning area. The meetings are two steps below casual and the attendance is made up of whoever happens to be in the office at the time. If you missed one, no one would think twice of it. Brandon extended the invitation for me to attend my first stand up meeting. I had much higher expectations of what was gonna take place. The purpose of stand up meetings are only to share general updates on the exciting work of Biocom employees. If you’re gonna be out of the office a day or two, you share that. If you have a report coming out soon and you’re gonna be busy non-stop until then, you share that. Everyone is given an opportunity to speak. If you have nothing to add, then a simple “pass” will do. Being the “new guy”, I didn’t have that option. A casual introduction was given. And given again next week for those who weren’t in attendance at the last weekly stand-up. These stand up meetings really allow for the sharing of individuals personality. When it was her time to speak, one colleague flipped her hair and said “nothing new with me”. She had just had recently had extensions put in and here hair dyed. The crowd loved it. “That’s hard to follow”.

Once a month, the stand up takes on a new form as the “all staff” meeting. A genetically mutated stand-up meeting on steroids, but with food, handouts, and if you’re not in the office or you work from the LA or Bay Area locations, you call in. There is a major jump in attendance. There is a formal invitation shared via email. I was invited personally from a colleague, just in case I didn’t get the message. “You might wanna go in 15 minutes early, there’s food”. I learned my lesson early on: when there’s a food announcement, you go immediately or you risk missing out. “Oh and no phones”. The no phones rule was reiterated on the All-Staff Meeting handouts, along with a friendly reminder to clean up after yourself and, for ladies, that there is no privacy screens under the tables that line the perimeter of the room where we sit. There was also a compilation of the new members for May 2015, 25 in total. The handout had the updates each department would cover. HR, Public Policy, BI, Bay Area, LA., Membership, Purchasing Group, and so on. Although in appearance, the meeting seemed light years more professional than regular weekly stand-ups, there was still a good amount of personality radiating from each group. We got pretty off topic. But the conversation was enjoyable and Pete, a co-worker, provided plenty of comic relief. Once we got too off topic, some would sarcastically yell out the next item on the handout, only to stir up more laughter. Last on the agenda was anniversaries and shout outs. “Oscar Rodarte, three years”. Oscar received an applause followed by an envelopes. Joe Panetta, 20 years. Received an wholesome applause, even in his absence. He wasn’t phoned in that Wednesday morning either- some conference?

Joe Panetta, the CEO, was in attendance at the most recent stand up meeting. Joe got it started- the most senior employee present usually leads the meeting- holding an award Biocom received from a life-science industry leader in Canada. A real maple leaf sealed in side glass. Joe strongly emphasized that the award, waving it around in his hands as he spoke, was for each and every one of Biocom’s employees. He handed it off and suggested it be displayed at the front of the office. Joe also began to speak on how we often overlook our relationship with Canada as a country, because of how similar we may think we are and our proximity. We went around the room, an announcement about Biocom’s upcoming community service project with Ocean Discovery was given. “Pass”, “pass”, “pass”. Brenda, the office assistant, roughly the most important person in the office, began to present Joe his envelope since he wasn’t at the last weekly meeting. He shares a story about when he was hired 20 years ago and was asked to fire half the staff at the time. 20 years ago he called an all-staff meeting. Only five people showed up. He knew then he had problems, when the CEO calls an all staff and people are missing. Joe was informed the total staff was nine at the time. Those in attendance disagreed and said there was only six. Either way, whoever did not make that meeting was let go. Along with the current CEO who he had been asked to replace. Who he found sitting in his office when arrived 20 years ago. Joe Panetta was asked to fire the very person he was replacing… Luckily she quietly stepped aside before he was given the chance to.

 

 

 

2 thoughts on “On Wednesdays, we meet.

  • June 19, 2019 at 1:49 pm
    Permalink

    Certainly sound like colorful meetings and you’ve definitely painted a picture of some of the personalities. Not sure though that you really addressed items in the prompt. Does the site’s context require leadership to attend to certain issues over others and that is why – 20 years ago – Joe was brought in? Seems that you feel the relatively informal nature of meetings is a strength, are there any weaknesses? You comment about Brenda the office assistant saying ‘roughly the most person in the office’ – not really sure what that means. Though I’m not grading for grammar, at times it is a bit rough (though generally, I can figure out what you mean). Don’t forget you have to write TWO theories in action posts (out of the six).

    • June 19, 2019 at 4:13 pm
      Permalink

      Thank you for responding to my post! But you are right! I did not address all the items in the prompt. I focused on the norms and the process of learning these norms at my internship site, the ways in which people interact (formally or informally), and the ways in which people communicate. To me, the most interesting. I went with the “three” out of the “at least three of the following” in the prompt. I could have forced it and went in to how my site’s context (type of industry or history) affects the way it functions and is led, and include whether the site’s context requires the leadership to be more attentive to certain issues than to others but, I was going to save the mundane for the paper. I’m not feeling the leadership from Joe other than the short example I gave, his need to make sure the whole company feels valued and emphasizing the award he brought back was ours and not just his. He is very much busy and out of sight, along with that, a large gap between my work and is. To be clear, I think the causality of the environment, meetings, conversations is a strength here. As well as the system of sharing communication and info. If you’re going to expect someone to work somewhere for 40 hours a week, then it better be somewhere they can relax. The meetings also provide for a closeness in a sense. The causality can be a weaknesses if unchecked, the example I gave was when things get off topic. But Brenda, the most IMPORTANT person in the office, and her handouts serve as a check for us getting off topic. Even though, laser focus is not required in that moment. Grammar will be fixed.

Comments are closed.

css.php