Final Exposition

The differences in Shakespeare’s tests

The exposition in "The Merchant of Venice" is based on a short story: "The tale of Giannetto of Venice and the Lady of Belmont", part of the collection "Il Pecorone".  In the short story, the suitors must spend €˜a successful night in bed' with the woman as their test and the Portia character tricks them with drugged wine.  In this production both the character of Portia and the test itself are changed, and since Portia needs to be portrayed as a more wholesome Christian woman it seems fit that her test is more virtuous. 

Where are we?

                Venice, a Street

            Shylock's House

            Portia's House (Belmont)

What is it like?

                There are references that they are rich, so the location is lavish.

                Antonio: "€¦I thank my fortune for it,

                My ventures are not in one bottom trusted,

                Nor to one place; nor is my whole estate

                Upon the fortune of this present year." (Act I Scene I lines 41-44)

            Authority figures are all Christian

            Predominantly Christian society with a Jewish minority

What's the situation?

                Antonio is in a sad state, and his friends are trying to aid him. 

Bassanio is in love with Portia, but cannot marry her because of the restraints that her father has placed on her ability to marry. 

            Portia's father set up a trial for any of her potential suitors.  They must choose the correct casket: either gold, silver, or lead. 

            Shylock is a rich money-lending Jew who causes rifts within the Christian Merchants of Venice. 

            Shylock's daughter Jessica and Lorenzo wish to be married against the wishes of Shylock. 

            Bassanio already owes Antonio money.  This sheds light on their relationship, that Antonio would give Bassanio money even when he already has a debt to pay. 

What are the time and period?

            They mention trade with Asia and the Americas

            Mid 1500s-Shakespeare's time

Who are all these people?

Antonio-A merchant of Venice

Bassanio – Antonio's friend, in love with Portia;

Gratiano, Salanio, Salarino, Salerio – friends of Antonio and Bassanio;

Lorenzo – friend of Antonio and Bassanio, in love with Jessica;

Portia – a rich heiress

Nerissa – Portia's waiting woman

Balthasar – Servant to Portia

Stephano – Servant to Portia

Shylock– a rich Jew, father of Jessica

Tubal – a Jew; Shylock's friend

Jessica – daughter of Shylock, in love with Lorenzo; Jewess,

Launcelot Gobbo – a foolish man in the service of Shylock

Old Gobbo – father of Launcelot

Leonardo – servant to Bassanio

Duke of Venice – Venetian authority who presides over the case of Shylock's bond

Prince of Morocco – suitor to Portia

Prince of Aragon – suitor to Portia

What have they to do with each other?

                As is stated above, they are either in business with each other or in love with each other.  Generally speaking, Antonio and Shylock are in business with each other and mortal enemies.  Portia and the rest of the women have fallen in love and try to test their lovers. 

What are they doing here?

                Many of these characters were either born into wealth or attained wealth through their own hard work, so their motivations are generally related to monetary gain.  

FINAL ANALYSIS

I. Environmental Facts:

1. Geographical

·       Set in New Orleans

·       Exterior of a corner building on a street called "Elysian Fields"
*Elysian Fields-ancient Greek version of the afterlife; heaven.
between the river and the train tracks in a poor section of New Orleans with "raffish [crude] charm

·       House #632

·       Steve and Eunice live upstairs
Stanley and Stella live downstairs

·       There are two rooms (kitchen and bedroom) and a bathroom.

·       There is a bar within earshot

·       bowling alley down the street

2. Date

·         Sc. I: Early May evening

·         Sc. II: 6:00 the evening after Scene 1.

  • Sc. III: Early morning: 2:30
  • Sc.  IV: Later that morning
  • Sc. VI: 2 AM the same evening as Scene 5.

·         Sc. VII: Late afternoon in mid-September .

·         Sc. IIIV: 45 minutes after Scene 7.

·         Sc. IX: "A while later that evening."

·         Sc. X: "A few hours later that night."

·         Sc. XI: Weeks later after Scene 10.

3. Economic

·       Shabby, faded, everything is falling apart

  • Blanche DuBois: dressed in a white suit appropriate for an upper-crust social event
  • Blanche is broke after losing Belle Reve

·       Stanley and Mitch are in denim "work clothes"

·       Blanche is shocked that Stella has no maid

·       Stanley controls the household finances (Stella does not receive a "regular allowance"; possible that this is the norm?).

·            Coming off the heels of WWII, Great Depression, etc

4. Political

·            Stanley's adherence to the Napoleonic Code and the ideals of Huey Long

·            Technical Revolution and the rise of the working class are in full swing.

·            The script was published in 1946, which was just after the conclusion of World War II and during the Technological Revolution (second Industrial Revolution). Americans idealized the middle/lower class men who served in the war. The characteristics which make a great soldier (strong, savage, detached) became accepted within the home and family. Also, Americans' attitudes towards the upper class was unfavorable. Following the Great Depression, after a period of high unemployment rates, many Americans disliked the affluent who were unaffected.

·            Stanley represents the working class. He is a decorated soldier. His behavior is acceptable, even when he is violent. In contrast, Blanche cannot catch a break. Blanche's old southern values have been replaced by the values of the Technological Revolution.

5. Social

·       Stanley treats Stella badly: yells at her

·       Blanche DuBois: dressed in a white suit appropriate for an upper-crust social event

·       Blanche and Stella are originally from Laurel, Mississippi

·       Blanche is a school teacher

·       Stella is pregnant

·       Stanley and Mitch are 28-30 years old, and in denim "work clothes"

·       Stella looks 25 and has "a background obviously quite different from her husband's" (4)

·       Stella, Eunice and Blanche are white

·       Blanche is around 5 years older than Stella. They are sisters.

·       Stanley is Polish, and a Master Sergeant in the Engineers Corps

·       Blanche has an acquaintance named Shep Huntleigh, who she dated in college. Shep has become fairly wealthy through the oil business. Social

·       Stanley controls the household finances (Stella does not receive a "regular allowance"; possible that this is the norm?).

·       Stanley is a Capricorn.

·       Blanche (claims she) is a Virgo.

·       Blanche can speak at least a few phrases of French; Mitch cannot

·       Blanche has "old-fashioned ideals."

·       Mitch's mother worries that he will not marry before she dies

·       Stanley and Mitch work at the same plant and play on the same bowling team

6. Religious

·            Blanche references God and being made in His image; implies that she is a Christian.

·            Stanley's adherence to the Napoleonic Code and the ideals of Huey Long

·            Coming off the heels of WWII, Great Depression, etc

·             Blanche seems to put some sort of stock in astrology.

·            Blanche believes in the power of self-deception to shape subjective reality.

·             Blanche claims that "deliberate cruelty is not forgivable."

·            The characteristics which make a great soldier (strong, savage, detached) were valued at this time.

II. Previous Action:

·       Blanche lost Belle Reve estate after the deaths of her and Stella's remaining relatives.  It was lost on a foreclosed mortgage.

·       She has taken a leave of absence from teaching "for her nerves" but later it is discovered it was because she slept with a 17 year old student.

·       Stella is pregnant.

·       Blanche was married before to a man named Allan, but after she discovered he was homosexual, he committed suicide.

·       Steve has been engaging in behavior giving Eunice cause to suspect him of infidelity

·       Mitch and Stanley served together in the "Two-forty-first."

·       Blanche was kicked out of The Flamingo Hotel for her promiscuous behavior, and ruined her reputation in Laurel.

III. Polar attitudes of main characters:

Blanche:

Starts the play with a superior ability to ignore the aspects of her reality she does not like, by masking herself in a web of lies. By the end of the play, the web has untangled, and she falls into insanity to avoid acknowledging the stress of her past behavior.

1.       How do I (the character) feel about my world?

a.       The world is for the socially elite.  As long as one has some semblance of dignity and one can truly maintain your reputation, the world will be fine.  Social class is of utmost importance, along with every aspect of class.  The money, appearance, and knowledge of the upper classes should not be ignored and I must make sure that I can continue my reputation as a lady; I know that everyone will respect me and take care of me.  At this point in my life I don't exactly know where I can turn; my family connections are dead or in poverty and my estate is ruined.  I have had my weak moments in the past, but I know that I am still a woman to be respected and treated daintily and nothing can change that.

2.       How do I feel about my relationships?

a.       As far as men are concerned, they should pay attention to me and provide for me simply because of who I am and where I came from.  I love Stella and I only want the best for her, but I'm still angry that she left Belle Reve.  Stanley is low class and Stella deserves better.  Even so, I want to know what makes him tick.  Mitch is sweet, but will never be any more than just a friend.  He lacks the true qualities of a gentleman.  Shep Huntleigh, on the other hand, is everything that I ever dreamed that he would be, and if I can make sure that he is my husband, then we can live the perfect life together.

3.       How do I feel about myself?

a.       I am sweet and sensitive and I always want to put my best foot forward.  I can only hope that people feel the same about me, and I hope that my social standing will remain constant throughout the rest of my life.

4.       How do I feel about my prospects?

a.       At this point, prospects do not look so promising.  My husband has committed suicide and I must now live with my freshly impoverished sister.  As soon as I can find a husband who can provide for me I will be able to live the rest of my life comfortably.

Naïve-If you appear to be innocent and naïve, no one will question you.

Untrue-Living in lies will end your reputation.

Innocent: Women should not give in to their desires.

Guilty: Once women have given in to their desires, the attempts to cover them up will be futile.

Hopeful: It is still possible to live in the past.

Desperate: Once you have crossed certain boundaries, there is no going back.

Beautiful-The art of being a southern belle will bring me a future.

Ashamed and Disheveled- Southern gentility is dead.

Stella:

Stella begins the play hoping to help her sister, and ends the play having given up on her.  She also has fluctuations with her relationship with Stanley: She seems relatively content at the beginning of the play, attempts to leave him in the middle for a brief period, returns to him, and ends the play purposefully ignoring his rotten behavior so that she can attempt to be happy with him.

1.       How do I (the character) feel about my world?

a.       I used to live in the Laurel, Mississippi on a grand estate, but now I essentially live in the slums of New Orleans.  I know this life isn't what was supposed to happen to me, but I don't mind it at all.  I'm madly in love with Stanley and I know, no matter what he does, that he loves me back.  It annoys me that Blanche feels that she can judge my life based on what she thinks I should be.  I am perfectly fine where I am.

2.       How do I feel about my relationships?

a.       Stanley is the most important person in my life.  I don't like being out of his presence for a second and I feel horrible when he's not with me.  Blanche is my sister and of course I love her, but she needs to figure out what's going on in her life and not judge me.

3.       How do I feel about myself?

a.       I feel like I'm doing all right with my life as of right now.  I couldn't move away from here even if I needed to.  I love Stanley and I need to be with him and I'm carrying his child, so there's no way that I could leave this alone.

4.       How do I feel about my prospects?

a.       Stanley is going places.  He knows that he's going to be somebody important and I believe him wholeheartedly.  I'll be there for him when he becomes successful.

Imagination-Living the dream is possible.

Determination- Reality is difficult but you must learn to live with it.

Floating-Devotion is given to the person who loves me the most.

Loyalty-I must support everything that Stanley stands for.

Stanley:

Stanley does not change much throughout the play.  He is violent and head strong at the beginning, and violent and headstrong at the end.

1.       How do I (the character) feel about my world?

a.       I have the ambition and drive to go where nobody else can go.  I may seem crude to some people, but they just don't understand me.  I've always been lucky and I know that that will make me successful later on in life.  I live in the now, I never think in the future and I don't let events in the past bother me.

2.       How do I feel about my relationships?

a.       Stella is the only thing I care about.  I'm going to do whatever it takes to take care of her, but sometimes she doesn't understand that I'm in charge and I have to remind her.  Sometimes I get a little out of control, but it's what I'm supposed to do.  I don't trust Blanche and I think that she's trying to cut Stella out of the Belle Reve money.  She's a drunk and a liar and I'm going to figure out what's happening behind her Southern Belle mask.

3.       How do I feel about myself?

a.       I'm pretty proud with what I've been able to accomplish and I know that there's something special and unique about me.

4.       How do I feel about my prospects?

a.       The future is bright for me.  I know what I want and I know how to get it, and there's never anything that stands in my way.  I know that I'll eventually end up on top no matter what.

Determined -If you know what you love then you'll be able to get it in the end

Unmotivated-Social class has nothing to do with internal class: money is not important.

Passionate-The love between a man and a woman will never die.

Brutish-Sex is nothing more than an animalistic urge.

Mitch:

At the start of the play, Mitch is very polite and respectful to Blanche, believing her to be a pure woman.  By the end of the play, he has become disrespectful after learning of her past, but also depressed at her mental state

IV.  Significance of the Facts in the Total Meaning of the Play:

This is a play about reality versus fantasy. Blanche spends the majority of the play attempting to ignore her reality by creating a fantasy world. Stanley is the realist, and picks apart Blanche's fantasies every step of the way, eventually dominating her by raping her, demonstrating reality's triumph over fantasy. The given circumstances of the play help demonstrate this struggle by giving it a context. Blanche used to live in a wealthy home, she lost her money, her husband, her virtue, and her youth. Without those given circumstances Blanche would have no need to hide herself lies, because her reality would not be so painful. Stella parallels Blanche, and her given circumstances, though fairly similar, lead to a different conclusion. Stella, too, has lost her fortune, but she gave up her higher class background to be with Stanley. They live in a cramped apartment in a cheap neighborhood, but unlike Blanche, who tries to dress it up, Stella accepts it. She is also pregnant when the play starts, a manifestation of the positive side of her life, and why she is willing to accept her reality: her attraction to Stanley.

The given circumstances also create the social climate of the time, which is very important in creating a context for Blanche, Stella and Stanley's behaviors. Stanley is a decorated soldier, and lives like a soldier: strong and savage when need be. He is a "man's man" making him the head of the house. This gives him leave to treat the woman of the house how he sees fit. Including both beating on Stella and raping Blanche. Stella forgives Stanley, which is believable considering the amount of her life she has already sacrificed for him, including wealth and living close to home. Blanche is supposed to abide by the values of a good woman: innocence and beauty, but sacrifices her innocence to feel beautiful and comforted after her husband commits suicide. Thus, she is not a good woman and deals with the consequences as previously stated: by creating a web of lies to live behind. These values emphasize the double standards of gender roles, with a man getting away with abuse and rape, while a woman who has consensual sex, but with many men, is completely destroyed.

Conclusion- Idea and Metaphor

Title– A Streetcar Named Desire

Besides the literal meaning of the title of the play it also serves as a metaphor.  Desire is the drive that behind human action.  People go where their desire takes them.  The fact that there is a streetcar (representing modernization) shows that despite the advent of society and civilization people are still driven by their basic desires.

Metaphor for the play

Modern-day cavemen

Though the play takes place in the industrialized New Orleans, the men all still have the mentality of cavemen.  They are aggressive hunters acting on their baser instincts.

Philosophical Statements

Key idea that can be seen throughout the text of "A Street Car Named Desire." These philosophical statements can be categorized as Gender Roles, Poker, Life and Death, and Animal Metaphors.Gender Roles

1.      "Have you ever heard of the Napoleonic code?"

2.      "You men with your big clumsy fingers."

3.      "I've never met a woman that didn't know if she was good-looking or not without being told, and some of them give themselves credit for more than they've got."

4.      "Some men are took in by this Hollywood glamor stuff and some men are not."

5.      "You can't beat a woman and then call'er back!"

6.      "When men are drinking and playing poker anything can happen."

7.      "A man like that is someone to go out with – once – twice – three times when the devil is in you."

8.      "And men don't want anything they get too easy. But on the other hand men lose interest quickly. Especially when the girl is over – thirty. They think a girl over thirty ought to go – the vulgar term is – €˜put out.'"

9.      "The one (law of nature) that says the lady must entertain the gentleman €”  or no dice!"

10.  "A man with a heavy build has got to be careful of what he puts on him so he don't look too clumsy."

11.  "Hughey Long €˜Every Man is a King'"

12.  "A cultivated woman, a woman of intelligence and breeding, can enrich a man's life €” immeasureably!"

13.  "I always did say that men are callous things with no feelings, but this does beat anything. Making pigs of yourselves."

The most prevalent category of philosophical statements in "A Street Car Named Desire" is the general statements about the role of men and women. These statements all refer to specific ways that men and women are expected to act. As for men, the reference to them as kings implies that they are the primary actors in the society who determine how things should be. On the other hand, women are seen as the secondary actors in the society, and their roles are to "entertain the gentleman" (9) and "enrich a man's life." (12) However, unlike the men's role, there seems to be a contradiction in the women's role. On one hand, it is stated that the important thing about women is their "intelligence and breeding" as can be seen in quote 12, while on the other hand, it is stated that the important thing about women is their sexual appeal, as evident in the reference to being "good-looking" in quote 3 and the reference in quote 8 about how women are "put out" when they reach thirty. There is a gap between how the society tells women to act, and the reality of women. This is because the men are the primary actors, and the rules of society were created by men. This leads to the idea that "There are specific roles for both men and women, but the role of women contradicts with the reality because it is a male-dominated society."

Poker

1.      "When men are drinking and playing poker anything can happen."

2.      "Nothing belongs on a poker table but cards, chips and whiskey."

3.      "Poker should not be played in a house with women."

Poker is a symbolic activity that Tennessee Williams uses in "A Street Car Named Desire." In the play, poker is not only a gamble, but also a stage for the males to compete with each other and try to prove their superiority. It is a symbol for politics. Quote 1 suggests how poker is a stage for significant actions, while quote 2 and 3 describe the exclusiveness of the game. The fact that women are excluded from this game reinforces the idea that "In the society, men are the primary actors and women are the secondary actors."

Life and Death

1.      "And funerals are pretty compared to deaths. Funerals are quiet, but deaths – not always."

2.      "Death is expensive, Ms. Stella."

3.      "There is so much – so much confusion in the world."

4.      "People have got to tolerate each other's habits, I guess."

5.      "No matter what happens, you've got to keep on going."

6.      "To hold front position in this rat-race you've got to believe you are lucky."

7.      "But, honey, you know as well as I do that a single girl, a girl alone in the world, has got to keep a firm hold on her emotions or she'll be lost!"

Another major category of philosophical statements in "A Street Car Named Desire" is Life and Death. There are several quotes that refer to the nature of life and death in the text. Of these quotes, the recurring theme seems to be about how humans should deal with life. Quote 4, 5, and7 all refer to how one should deal with life, and the conclusion is that one has to accept whatever happens and cope with it. This submissiveness of female characters can be seen throughout the play, and in relation to the conclusion of the above categories, one can say that it is because of the fact that males are the dominant actors who determine how things should be in the society. Females do not have the power to change this structure, and any sufferings that they receive, they simply have to endure them and cope with them.

Animal Metaphor

1.      "That shut her up like a clam."

2.      (Old farmer, hen and rooster joke.)

3.      "Is he a wolf?"

4.      "You hens cut out that conversation in there."

5.      (Like a dancing bear)

6.      "He was as good as a lamb"

7.      "Yes, something –  ape-like about him, like one of those pictures I've seen in – anthropological studies! Thousands and thousands of years have passed him right by, and there he is – Stanley Kowalski – survivor of the stone age! Bearing the raw meant home from the kill in the jungle."

8.      "Night falls and other apes gather! There in front of the cave, all grunting like him, and swilling and gnawing and hulking! His poker night! – you call it – this party of apes! Somebody growls€”some creature snatches at something – the fight is on!"

9.      "Same canary-bird, huh!"

10.  "Parot"

11.  "He says you been lapping it up all summer like a wild-cat."

12.  "I stayed at a hotel called The Tarantula Arms!"

13.  "But he's not going to jump in a tank with a school of sharks."

In terms of metaphor, one will immediately notice how many metaphors to animals there are in the text of "A Street Car Named Desire." The comparison of animals with humans implies that humans are also fundamentally primitive. Another important idea that is evident in these metaphors is the two different kinds of metaphors for women. On one hand, women are compared with canary birds and clams, while on the other hand, they are compared to Tarantulas and sharks, those predator animals. When one focuses on the reason why there are two different kinds of metaphors for women, it becomes clear that image of women shift from weak animals to predators when they do not follow the social order of male dominance. For example, Blanche pursues happiness through her own power, instead of depending on one man. She does not play the role as a woman that the male-dominated society expects her to play, and this is when she is described as those predator animals. This is because she has become a threat to the male-dominated society by trying to be independent. The concluding idea is that "Humans are primitive animals. Men are accepted to express their primitive nature, though women who do the same are seen as dangerous."

Action

Each of the main characters' actions reveal ideas crucial to the play.

Stanley's actions (playing poker, drinking, having sex with Stella, raping Blanche) are fueled by his primal desires (compete with men, dominate women). Because Williams presents us with a society created and dominated by men, Stanley's male desires can be fully expressed without inhibition or fear of any negative consequences. Stanley is free to satisfy all of his desires by taking direct action, completely unopposed by society.

Stella is also driven by desire, and she too reveals this through her actions. She stays with Stanley despite his physical abuse because she can derive sexual and emotional pleasure only from being with him. Of course she does not like being beaten but Stella's actions make her priorities clear: she will sacrifice her independence if it is necessary in order to satisfy her desires. The idea illustrated here is that while social rules do not completely prohibit women from pursuing pleasure, they do restrict the ways in which women can do so, essentially demanding that they submit to male control of their lives. As opposed to men, who are largely free to do as they please, women must carefully balance their actions to get what they want without stepping outside their social boundaries.

Blanche is the author's example of a woman who refuses to accept the social limitations placed on women. Through her actions, (kissing the paperboy, drinking, flirting with Mitch) Blanche seeks to satisfy her desires in the same way that the men do. But society automatically condemns her because according to its rules, women should not have that same freedom. Throughout the play, as characters learn about Blanche's "scandalizing" past and present, they categorize her as an outsider, someone who breaks the rules of society and is therefore inferior. Both Mitch and Stanley attempt to force themselves on her because they desire her, but also because they disapprove of her openly expressed sexual desires.

Analyzing the outcome of the play for each character: Stanley satisfies his desires at no personal cost, successfully dominating his male friends and wife and ejecting the troublemaker Blanche from his house. Stella, by staying with Stanley and ignoring Blanche's accusation of rape, chooses desire (sex and love) at the expense of submitting to Stanley's power and losing her sister to an asylum. Blanche, as the only character who defied society's rules with her actions, is raped and sent to a mental institution. Her pathetic end demonstrates the futility of rebellion against acceptable social behavior.

The action and outcome of the play, then, suggest that both women and men are fundamentally driven by desire. However, in a male-dominated society men are free to seek gratification, while women must accept the constraints imposed on their desires or be crushed by unbearable consequences.

Overall Theme: People are driven by primitive desire, but women's desire is restricted by the male-dominated society.  This society only allows women to fulfill their desires by giving up their independence and submitting to men.

Given Circumstances relation to themes

Many of the given circumstances are found later on in the play as they pertain to the major characters.  This follows the theme of deception throughout the play and the idea of keeping secrets from other people to hide who you truly are.  Blanche does not want people to know who she truly is, so she hides her past and puts on a façade of the exact opposite ideals.  Stanley hides his true identity from Stella and does not tell her that he raped Blanche. 

The locations are also important in Streetcar.  The Elysian Fields reference the Grecian ideals of heaven.  This brings into question the ideas about perfection or paradise in the play.  Everyone has an ideal that they would like to reach, but it is not clear whether everyone reaches this ideal by the end of the play.

More on Blanche and Stanley

I also think it is very funny to see how much you can pick up about Blanche’s character through her dialogue and constant quoting of poems/Biblical references/etc. It shows her desire to be taken seriously in a world run by men, a patriarchal society, her desire to constantly appear smart shows how much she wishes to be thought of as bright and how much she wishes to be desired. We can infer alot about her loneliness through this too. The fact that she is always trying to prove her worth and justify her actions shows how importance appearance is to her and how much she wishes to be accepted and loved.

She is a fascinating character because her dialogue really reveals a lot of sadness. When we understand her character and take into perspective her growth as a character throughout the play we come to realize that she is very superficial and concerned with appearance. We can see in her dialogue that she is very concerned with the social standards of what it means to “be a lady” and have men interested in her. Stanley constantly questions her as a character and tries to get her to see past her own superficiality and “bullshit”

There is a lot we can learn about Stanley Kowalski through his dialogue too. The fact that he uses such blunt sentences so often and keeps his thoughts generally to the point shows us his masculinity and his desire to be “real” and never put on fronts. The fact that he constantly justifies his actions too through his moral stance “The Napoleonic Code” shows us that he is very rigid and has his own set of standards that he lives by regardless of how it makes others feel. He is unwavering and consistent. He weighs all thoughts and actions on his moral stance and is very much a stereotypical “tough guy.”

When I saw this performed (very well might I add with Cate Blanchett) it was interesting to see how much of Stanley’s power as a character is revealed in his dialogue, his sentences FEEL powerful and his way of addressing Blanche, Stella, and the guys feels consistently blunt, to the point, and masculine. I totally agree with Nick about Stanley’s first scene, it is interesting how much we learn about him in that first scene simply through the fact that he says no more than two word sentences the whole time.

The separation between Blanche’s southern aristocrat vibe and Stanley’s Tough Pollack vibe comes through the use of slang and grammar in the play. Blanche clearly uses her allusions to poetry and the Bible as a means of showing herself as a “classy intellectual person.” (Ie when she speaks of Poe, Mr. Edgar Allen Poe and also the fact that she keeps her grammar in check constantly and never lets herself “sound stupid”). Stanley CONSTANTLY curses and uses bad grammar (“What’s with all the rest of them papers” and “Get y’r ass off the table Mitch”). This separation of characters is very interesting to discover through the dialogue.

Some Interesting Reviews and Analyses

 Here is an interesting review I found on the extremely helpful data base Project Muse that really delves into past and present productions of Streetcar. I also have a review of the Split Britches Streetcar which took a whole new stance on the show and in the mean time did a wonderful job analyzing the gender roles and relations in the play.

 

As the century drew to a close, New York audiences witnessed one of the most extreme revisionings ever of a classic American play when director Ivo van Hove stripped bare both stage furnishings and actors alike and made an onstage bathtub the focal point of Tennessee Williams’s A Streetcar Named Desire. Had van Hove’s 1999 production at the New York Theatre Workshop opened a little earlier, it would certainly have merited more than passing mention in Philip C. Kolin’s stage history of a work that, for a half-century now, has been “interrogated” and “destabilized,” “radicalized,” and “deconstructed.” Kolin justly characterizes Streetcar as a seminal example of what he calls “stylized realism” in drama, formally innovative in its presentation of “interiority” and thematically daring in its treatment of “sexual politics.”

This prodigiously researched volume–Kolin consulted literally hundreds of production reviews–meticulously describes the intense theatrical collaboration that resulted in the play’s original and highly acclaimed 1947 production. It then goes on to record major restagings worldwide (from Mexico City to European capitals to Tokyo to South Africa); over thirty years of revivals around the United States from the mid-1950s on, including crosscast and multiracial ones; and adaptations to other media (film, ballet, television, opera), before concluding with a chronology of almost four dozen major productions. Through it all, Kolin displays an unerring instinct for choosing from the reviews just the phrases necessary to help readers see with their mind’s eye what was happening on stage.

Williams’s play has, over the years, attracted great actresses–Jessica Tandy, Vivien Leigh, Uta Hagen, Arletty, Claire Bloom–and great directors and designers–Elia Kazan, Jo Mielziner, Luchino Visconti, Franco Zefferelli, Ingmar Bergman. And, in Blanche DuBois and Stanley Kowalski, it has given American drama two of its most enduring and indelible characters. Blanche has been variously the “soft and shimmery” tragic victim, a “Foucaultian . . . poisoned disrupter,” an oppressor attracted to The Other, an arrogant bigotted racist, and a sensualist who achieves sanctification. Stanley has veered between the brute animality, orality, and “phallic gestures” that turned Marlon Brando into a sexual icon and a complex if sometimes beleaguered person of wit, insight, and intelligence.

A production history such as this takes on its greatest value when it prompts scholars and theatre practitioners to rethink the text. Reading about earlier innovations, such as Bergman’s decision to place a movie theatre called Desire, or the Pleasure Garden–showing a film entitled “Night in Paradise”–directly upon the stage; or Jean Cocteau’s adaptation that emphasized disparagement of the immigrant Stanley as a displacement of racial prejudice in a heavily black New Orleans; or the Japanese premiere that hinted at a connection between Blanche as an “unwelcome intruder” and the army occupation forces, can help alter staid perceptions and revision the text anew in imaginative and sometimes provocative ways. Many of the productions Kolin recounts reveal a much more politicized Streetcar than the original one, with increased emphasis on proletarian protest and class struggle, particularly in Italy, England, and through the black or interracial castings in America.

In his discussion of the 1951 film of Streetcar, Kolin usefully reminds readers that Williams upended the traditional female position by making “the male anatomy the object of desire”–a point that somehow seemed to elude Susan Bordo recently in The Male Body where she neglects to discuss the homosexual gaze in screen versions of 1950s plays by Williams and others. Yet, despite its potential usefulness in disputing a misreading of Blanche as a character in drag, the discussion (however welcome) of the queer/camp Belle Reprieve in a production history of Williams’s play is a little like including Hamletmachine or Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead in a stage history of Shakespeare’s tragedy. And even though Andre Previn’s recent operatic version of Streetcar, with a libretto by Philip Littel, may have succeeded in restoring the centrality of Blanche that had been lost (along with any hint of homosexuality) in the censored Hollywood movie, it seems an odd choice to privilege it in the cover photo since it is not Williams’s play.

Kolin might have generalized even more than he does about the trends he uncovers in the way that Streetcar has been reimagined in different times and places and for different audiences. And if the format of the Cambridge series forces him to be almost too objective and largely to eschew interpretation and evaluation, readers can find in the reliable select bibliography references to the major recent articles that have made Kolin an undisputed expert on Williams’s richest play and perfectly suited to lead them authoritatively through its history.

“What is striking is not simply how often Williams’s play
of A Streetcar Named Desire has been recycled, so that it has taken on the status of a cultural artifact A cultural artifact is a human-made which gives information about the culture of its creator and users. The artifact may change over time in what it represents, how it appears and how and why it is used as the culture changes over time. , but also how deeply these re-citings of Williams’s text are caught up in issues of gender and sexuality, as well as issues of performance and the performative
Relating to or being an utterance that peforms an act or creates a state of affairs by the fact of its being uttered under appropriate or conventional circumstances, as a justice of the peace uttering . Of queerness and the attachment to cultural objects, Eve Sedgwick writes in Tendencies, “We needed for there to be sites where the meanings didn’t line up tidily with each other, and we learned to invest those sites with fascination and love” (3). Perhaps some of the “fascination” of Streetcar is the number of these sites–masculinity, femininity, madness, desire–where these slippages of meanings, what Sedgwick would term excesses, tend to occur: where the lines don’t fall neatly into place. The trajectory of desire supposedly ends, as Blanche knows, in death
First presented at London’s Drill Hall in January 1991 and then a month later at LaMama in New York
New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of , Belle Reprieve is a work Co-written and performed by Bette Bourne Bourne, town (1990 pop. 16,064), Barnstable co., SE Mass., crossed by Cape Cod Canal; settled 1627, inc. 1884. Bourne Bridge (1935), across the canal, made the town an entry point to Cape Cod and a resort and commercial center.  and Paul Shaw Paul Shaw (born September 4 1973 in Burnham, England) is an English footballer who currently plays for Oxford United.

Shaw started his career as a trainee at Arsenal, turning professional in 1991. His debut came against Nottingham Forest on December 3 1994.  of the gay British group Bloolips, and Peggy Shaw and Lois Weaver of Split Britches, a lesbian-identified off-off Broadway group. By altering and reversing the gender roles in Streetcar (Blanche is played by Bette Bourne, as “a man in a dress”; Stanley is played by Peggy Shaw, as “a butch lesbian”; Mitch is played by Paul Shaw, as “a fairy disguised as a man”; and Stella by Lois Weaver as “a woman disguised as a woman” [4)), this theatrical piece creates a Brechtian commentary on the sexual roles and games in Williams’s text. Belle Reprieve’s intertexts (which include the film version of Streetcar), its moments of vaudeville, and the characters’ own self-conscious attention to theatricality extend the gendered role-playing into a deconstruction of dramatic role-playing itself. Like Heiner Muller’s Hamletmachine or like many of Char les Ludlam’s works for the Ridiculous Theater (Big Hotel, Bluebeard Bluebeard, nickname of the chevalier Raoul in a story by Charles Perrault. In the story Bluebeard’s seventh wife, Fatima, yielding to curiosity, opens a locked door and discovers the slain bodies of her predecessors. , etc.), Belle Reprieve’s response to the past, to its theatrical antecedents, is a complex one. Ultimately, the work is less of a parody or an adaptation of Streetcar than it is a postmodern refashioning and a “queering” of a play that is already, as C. W. E. Bigsby puts it, about “a culture in a state of crisis, its certainties dislocating, its myths collapsing” (16).

Throughout Belle Reprieve, the characters/performers comment on the relationships between the roles of gender and sexuality they play (both in this piece and in “real life”), and the gender/sexuality of Williams’s characters. Williams hints throughout Streetcar, for instance, at Stella’s sensuality: the morning after the “poker night” fight
Bound collection of comic strips, usually in chronological sequence, typically telling a single story or a series of different stories. The first true comic books were marketed in 1933 as giveaway advertising premiums.  in her hand, “[h]er eyes and lips have that almost narcotized nar·co·tize
tr.v. nar·co·tized, nar·co·tiz·ing, nar·co·tiz·es
1. To place under the influence of a narcotic.

2. To put to sleep; lull.

3. To dull; deaden.  tranquility that is [on) the faces of Eastern idols” (62). The writers of Belle Reprieve go one step further and play with the image of Stella’s sexual drive as overdetermined Overdetermined can refer to

  • Overdetermined systems in various branches of mathematics
  • Overdetermination in various fields of psychology or analytical thought

and narcissistic nar·cis·sism   also nar·cism
n.
1. Excessive love or admiration of oneself. See Synonyms at conceit.

2. A psychological condition characterized by self-preoccupation, lack of empathy, and unconscious deficits in . In her opening speech–directed partially at herself, partially at the audience–she asks:

Is there something you want? What can I do for you? Do you know who I am, what I feel, how I think? You want my body. My soul, my food, my bed, my skin, my hands? You want to touch me, hold me, lick me, smell me, eat me, have me? You think you need a little mote (reMOTE) A wireless receiver/transmitter that is typically combined with a sensor of some type to create a remote sensor. Some motes are designed to be incredibly small so that they can be deployed by the hundreds or even thousands for various applications (see smart dust).  time to decide? Well, you’ve got a little over an hour to have your fill. (5)

As the object of Stanley’s desire, Stella here has embraced (and refigured) her own role as commodity; moreover, her words call attention to the audience’s status as consumers, as hungry to possess the performer, to get their “fill” of her–at least until the (performance) time is up. As if she were aware of Williams’s stage directions, Belle Reprieve’s Stella explains to Mitch, “Look, I’m supposed to wander around in a state of narcotized sexuality. That’s my part” (6). Blanche’s visit brings out Stella’s quasi-incestuous revelations of her attraction to her sister, as the two don matching cheerleaders’ outfits and sing about exploring one another’s bodies “under the covers” (14). But we also see the “colored lights” of Streetcar enacted in the moments of passion between Stella and Stanley (doubled in Brechtian fashion by the awareness of many audience members in the original performance that Lois Weaver [Stella] and Peggy Shaw [Stanley] were real-life lovers)–particularly when Stella pulls off Stanley’s ri pped T-shirt as Stanley carries her offstage, thus evoking Marlon Brando’s Stanley in the very moment that the audience’s attention is called to Peggy Shaw’s body. As Elm Diamond puts it, in an often-cited essay on Brechtianism and feminism that has, I think, interesting applications for discussions of queer theater as well, “Brechtian theory imagines a polyvalence pol·y·va·lent
adj.
1. Acting against or interacting with more than one kind of antigen, antibody, toxin, or microorganism.

2. Chemistry
a. Having more than one valence.

b.  to the body’s representation, for the performer’s body is also historicized, loaded with its own history and that of the character, and these histories ruffle the smooth edges of representation” (89).

In a monologue that Split Britches member Deb Margolin Deb Margolin is an American performance artist and playwright. Coming to prominence in the 1980’s, as script-writer and performer in the feminist theater troupe Split Britches (of which she was a founding member), Margolin has since gone solo in a string of one-woman shows, which  wrote for the play, Stella talks to Cassandra, the seer, asking her for advice on love, and poses and sings “Running Wild” like Marilyn Monroe, after she says to the imaginary Cassandra, “Come sweet prophetess, what is going to happen? Tell me, I’m nailed to this story. Cut me down. I’m in here. Can’t you see me?” (22). In this sense, Stella is portrayed as a woman who is entrapped in the limited “part” that has been written for her, yet who makes the best of it by immersing herself in her own desires. She tells Stanley, “I know that your tension is sexual, and it’s a desire I share in, but not for your pleasure, for my own” (24). Her words mock Williams’s image of Stella as a woman who is willing to sacrifice everything for Stanley’s needs (here, even when Blanche is trying to argue Stella out of her attraction to Stanley [“I think he’s a fag,” she says (27)], Stella is more interested in the taste of the Coke she is drinking, which she conflates with he r orgasmic satisfaction: “Pure sugar, liquid sex” [27]). Elizabeth Grosz Elizabeth A. Grosz is a feminist academic living and working in the USA. She is known for philosophical interpretations of the work of French philosophers Jacques Lacan, Jacques Derrida, Michel Foucault and Gilles Deleuze, as well as her readings of the works of French feminists, , in an important essay on “Refiguring Lesbian Desire,” argues that the traditional psychoanalytic interpretation of desire as based on “lack” should be replaced with an account of lesbian desire that is full, productive, predicated on presences rather than absences–more, she says, like Gilles Deleuze’s characterization of “practices and action” than the Freudian view that links the female with objects, receptacles, emptinesses (75). Belle Reprieve’s Stella is caught between her role as desired object (thus her evocation of Marilyn Monroe), and desiring subject; whereas Williams implies that the characters in Streetcar are motivated by desire, by lack–again, the end (or satisfaction) of which is death–the characters in Belle Reprieve parody and multiply their desires, making them what Grosz grosz
n. pl. gro·szy
See Table at currency.


[Polish, from Czech gro  would call “energies, excitations [and] impulses” (78).It is difficult not to bring Allan–Blanche’s first lover in Streetcar, who killed himself after Blanche discovered his homosexuality–to mind as we see Mitch in Belle Reprieve flirt alternately with Blanche (the drag queen drag queen Female impersonator, gynemimetic Sexology A ™‚ with ™€ affect–often ‘overplayed’; a ™‚ homosexual and ™€ wannabe, with ™‚ genitalia; DQs may take hormones to †‘ breasts, and thus are hormonally, but not surgically ) and with the very butch Stanley. If Mitch, portrayed as a “mama’s boy” in Williams’s play, is implicitly another Allan, then Belle Reprieve’s Mitch is correspondingly only part of the way out of the closet. After he delivers a long speech describing (in intricate detail) a vision of a man with “large bedroom eyes” on a blue feathered throne (16), he engages in a frenzied dialogue of erotic machismo machismo

Exaggerated pride in masculinity, perceived as power, often coupled with a minimal sense of responsibility and disregard of consequences. In machismo there is supreme valuation of characteristics culturally associated with the masculine and a denigration of  with Stanley (which also evokes some of the homoeroticism homoeroticism /ho·mo·erot·i·cism/ (ho?mo-e-rot´i-sizm) sexual feeling directed toward a member of the same sex.homoerot´ic  of Williams’s “poker night” scene). When Mitch gets carried away after he and Stanley arm wrestle–“Bite me! Bite me! Suck on me…” (17)–he has to pretend he is talking about mosquitoes, but the sequence culminates in Stanley’s song, “I’m a Man” (“spelled M … A … N” [19]). Mitch woos Blanche by appearing to her above the bathtub, w earing a fairy costume and playing the ukelele u·ke·le·le
n.
Variant of ukulele. ; later, in another one of the piece’s tableaulike monologues that seems to be directed out into the audience, he says:

I think it all started to go wrong when I wasn’t allowed to be a boy scout. There were more important things to be done. Vacuuming, clearing up at home, putting the garbage out… Then one day I fell in love with a beautiful young man. He came like a messenger from another world bearing a message of simple physical desire. But it was already too late, for me everything about the body was bound up with pain and boredom. I even used to ear fast because I found it so boring. Soon the boy left. … Then I was alone. At night I would lie awake Verb 1. lie awake – lie without sleeping; “She was so worried, she lay awake all night long”
lie – be lying, be prostrate; be in a horizontal position; “The sick man lay in bed all day”; “the books are lying on the shelf”  on my bed, and imagine I could hear things. (33)

The newsboy in Streetcar, referred to by Blanche as the “young man,” here becomes the “messenger” of desire for Mitch instead– but again, the invitation is not mutually reciprocal. If Mitch in Streetcar is self-conscious about his body (he tells Blanche that he’s ashamed of the way he perspires [88], and that he’s afraid his “heavy build” makes him look clumsy), then Mitch in Belle Reprieve is, like Stella, both the same and the opposite: he is slight rather than heavy, “bored” with his body, but the effect is to underscore the loneliness and marginalization mar·gin·al·ize
tr.v. mar·gin·al·ized, mar·gin·al·iz·ing, mar·gin·al·iz·es
To relegate or confine to a lower or outer limit or edge, as of social standing.  that both Mitches feel. Williams’s Mitch looks on helplessly from the sidelines at the end of Streetcar as Blanche is carted off to the asylum–but in Belle Reprieve, Mitch and Stella join one another in singing that they’re not quite the “pushovers” (36) that Williams’s text would make them our to be.

In Streetcar, when Blanche and Mitch return from their date at the amusement park amusement park, a commercially operated park offering various forms of entertainment, such as arcade games, carousels, roller coasters, and performers, as well as food, drink, and souvenirs.  on Lake Pontchartrain Lake Pontchartrain (local English pronunciation [leɪk ˈpÊ°É‘ntʃətʰɹeɪn]) (French: Lac Pontchartrain, pronounced  (notably bearing, the stage directions say, “a plaster statuette of Mae West” [85]), Blanche remarks to Mitch, “I don’t think I’ve ever tried so hard to be gay and made such a dismal mess of it.” She adds, echoing the language of the carnival they have just attended, “I get ten points for trying!” (85). Much, of course, has already been made of the original Blanche as a “coded” gay character. John Clum John Philip Clum (September 1 1851 – May 2 1932) was an Indian agent in the Arizona Territory who had the nickname “White Chief of the Apaches”. Clum was also the first mayor of Tombstone, Arizona, USA, and founder of the Tombstone Epitaph.  calls her “in many ways the quintessential gay character in American closet drama” (150), while David Savran points out that original impulses to see Blanche as “only” a “female impersonator female impersonator Vox populi Drag queen, see there ” have risked creating what he sees as reductive re·duc·tive
adj.
1. Of or relating to reduction.

2. Relating to, being an instance of, or exhibiting reductionism.

3. Relating to or being an instance of reductivism.
….. Click the link for more information. or homophobic interpretations of the play, though not necessarily so (115). More recently, Anne Fleche flèche
n.
A slender spire, especially one on a church above the intersection of the nave and transepts.


[French, arrow, flèche, from Old French, arrow, of Germanic origin; see  has suggested that it might be more useful to see Blanche’s character as an example of “the performative, constrained enactment of gender”; Blanche, Fleche argues,can be viewed as the representation of a woman who finally doesn’t pass as a subject, because she does her gender incorrectly, and because her hyperbolic hy·per·bol·ic   also hy·per·bol·i·cal
adj.
1. Of, relating to, or employing hyperbole.

2. Mathematics
a. Of, relating to, or having the form of a hyperbola.

b.  theatricality challenges the masculine/feminine heterosexual codes that enable and constrain gender performativity. (266)

Blanche’s identity in Belle Reprieve is triply (or perhaps quadruply) embedded: “she” is a woman played by a man who imagines herself not just as Williams’s Blanche DuBois, but as Vivien Leigh (like Bette Bourne, a Brit) playing the role of Blanche in Kazan’s movie. These multiple visible “texts” of Blanche depend in part on being hyperbolic: just as the “original” Blanche embodies her sexuality through the near-caricatured imagery of the Southern Belle, Belle Reprieve’s Blanche has an identity composed of surfaces, of costumes, of performances, such that when Stanley says he is going to look through the contents of her trunk to determine who she is, she tells the audience, “And so it was that I set out to prove to the world that I was indeed myself.” Stella says, “She threw herself at the feet of an unforgiving world to prove her identity,” and Mitch adds, “The answer was somewhere in that trunk” (9). In other words Adv. 1. in other words – otherwise stated; “in other words, we are broke”
put differently , in a postmodern theatrical universe, “Blanche” is inseparable from the costumes, the odds an d ends, the fragments that make up the performance of her “identity.” Williams’s Blanche, herself, is a consummate actress and role-player; Bigsby, among other critics, has characterized her as “construct[ing] her own drama, costuming herself with care, arranging the set, enacting a series of roles, developing her own scenario” (61). And if Bette Bourne as Blanche in drag is a comment on what Clum and others would see as the original ‘drag act’ of Williams’s Blanche, it is worth keeping in mind Judith Butler’s argument in Bodies that Matter that drag is predicated in part on an awareness of the performance of difference: “What is ‘performed’ in drag is, of course, the sign of gender, a sign that is not the same as the body it figures, but that cannot be read without it” (237). In Belle Reprieve, Blanche describes herself as feeling like “an old hotel. Beautiful bits of dereliction dereliction n. 1) abandoning possession, which is sometimes used in the phrase “dereliction of duty.” It includes abandoning a ship, which then becomes a “derelict” which salvagers can board.  in need of massive renovation” (28). As a ‘renovation’ of the text of Streetcar, Belle Reprieve itself reassembles the fragments o f Blanche into what are still fragments, but ones that allow us to read them (and hence her) differently. Stanley says to Blanche in what replaces the “rape scene,”

Previous Action:

Again, this is probably not all of the previous action, it is just what I found.

Previous Action:

Blanche lost Belle Reve estate after the deaths of her and Stella's remaing relatives.  It was lost on a foreclosed mortgage.

She has taken a leave of absence from teaching "for her nerves" but later it is discovered it was because she slept with a 17 year old student.

Stella is pregnant.

Blanche was married before to a man named Allan, but after she discovered he was homosexual, he committed suicide.

After losing Belle Reve, Blanche lived in a cheap motel, and would bring back lovers to make her feel less empty.

Final Plot Analysis for Antigone

Stasis
Thebes is torn apart by brotherly war and recent familial dishonor must decide between honor and civility when Eteocles and Polyneices, the two heirs to the throne, kill each other. Their headstrong sister, Antigone, rebels against a new law and Creon, the new King, must either stand by his new law or murder his niece. Inciting Incident: Although it happens offstage, the real action begins when Antigone attempts to bury her brother. This action is in direct opposition to the new decree and spurs on the rest of the action in the show.

 

Covering the action of the play (not the meaning) describe the significant part of the plot.

Two dueling brother, heirs to the throne of Thebes, kill each other in battle. The king of Thebes, Creon, decrees that it shall be a crime to give proper burial to Polyneices, but Antigone rebels against the law and gives burial rites to her brother. Through a series of complications and increasing amounts of pressure from both external and internal forces, Creon sentences Antigone to death. When his son's life is called into question, he quickly reverses his sentence, only to find that Antigone, his son Haemon, and his wife Eurydice have committed suicide on account of his actions. Creon admits his guilt in the matter, and is left with the prospect of ruling his city with no one to look to for support.

Inciting incident – what gets the whole story moving – it disrupts the stasis of the world of the play

Antigone buries and performs burial rituals and rites on the body of her brother Polyneices.

Beginning Exposition – what do we need to know to understand the story.

Most of the characters in the play come from the same royal family. Polynecies and Eteocles are brothers, Antigone and Ismene their sisters, and Creon their uncle. Also, Antigone and Creon's son Haemon are betrothed.

Eteocles and Polynecies, heirs to the throne, have agreed to share control after their father's death. However, when Eteocles eventually refuses to co-rule with Polynecies, a war erupts. This is what leads to the battle directly before the opening of the play.

Complications – disruptions that prevent the easy accomplishment of the goal of the central character (that characters “sufferings”); the pressures on the story.]

1. Creon bans an honorable burial for Polyneices
2. Ismene will not help Antigone bury her brother

a. "I'm not disrespecting them. But I can't act/against the state. That's not in my nature." (97-98)

3. The gods were against the war from the start

a. "seven equal warriors/paid Zeus their full bronze tribute,/the god who turns the battle tide,/all but that pair of wretched men,/born of one father and one mother, too-/who set their conquering spears against each other/and then both shared a common death." (168-173).

4. Creon is power-hungry

a. "And so I have the throne, all royal power" (171)

5. Creon does not want Polyneices to have an honorable burial

a. "€¦He'll be left unburied,/his body there for birds and dogs to eat,/a clear reminder of his shameful fate./that's my decision." (234-237)

6. The gods do not support Polyneices as a man and therefore do not honor his burial

a. "€¦Or do you see gods paying respect to evil men? No, no." (233-234)

7. Antigone does not fear Creon

a. "€¦Zeus did not announce those laws to me./and Justice living with the gods below/sent no such laws for men€¦" (508-510)

8. Antigone is emotional and perhaps not thinking clearly

a. "the spirit in this girl is passionate-/her father was the same. Shehas no sense/of compromise in times of trouble." (537-540)

9. Antigone wants to die with her brother. Creon must consider this

a. "Take me and kill me-what more do you want?" (565)

10. Antigone and Creon have conflicting ideas of honor

a. Creon: "These views of yours-so different from the rest/don't they bring you any sense of shame?"

b. Antigone: "No-there's nothing shameful in honouring my mother's children." (579-582)

11. Ismene tries to take Antigone's place

a. "I did it-/I admit it, and she'll back me up./So I bear the guilt as well." (614-616)

12. Antigone does not want to die with Ismene

a. "But you chose life-it was my choice to die." (635)

13. Creon will kill his son's love

a. Ismene: "You're going to kill your own son's bride?"

b. Creon: "Why not? There are other fields for him to plough." (650-651)

14. Creon's method of ruling called into question by Haemon. The city is on Antigone's side.

a. "Your gaze makes citizens afraid-they can't/say anything you would not like to hear./But in the darkness I can hear them talk-/the city is upset about the girl." (690-693)

b. Haemon: "The people here in Thebes all say the same-/they deny she is [doing wrong]."

c. Creon: "So the city now/will instruct me how I am to govern?" (835-838)

1.        "You'll not escape thei pain."  (1090)

2.        Teiresias foretells the death of Haemon's sons if Antigone is to die.

3.        Creon reaffirms his decision to sentence Antigone to death, despite the reasoning and arguments of his son Haemon.

 

Crisis – the moment leading to the climax

Creon reaffirms his decision to sentence Antigone to death, despite the reasoning and arguments of his son Haemon.

Teiresias prophesies that Haemon will die before the day is over because of Creon's actions.

Climax – the highest point of action where the maximum is at stake; a moment of discover and recognition

Creon reverses his death sentence on Antigone and rushes off to free her in order to prevent his son's death.

Reversal – the downward fall of the action.
The Messenger recounts to Chorus how Antigone and Haemon have committed suicide

Creon brings Haemon's body back to the palace and mourns, admitting total fault for the death of his son.

The Messenger reveals that Eurydice has committed suicide

Resolution – the final creation of a new stasis

Creon admits he was wrong and is completely guilty for the three deaths. He is left with only one surviving family member and no one to look to for support, praying only for death to come swiftly.

What is the play about based on our analysis?

Based on our analysis of the plot of Antigone, the play is about a King's downfall due to his pride and lack of wisdom and refusal to accept counsel.

"There's no release for mortal human beings,/not from events which destiny has set." (1336-1337)

"The most important part of true success/is wisdom-not to act impiously towards the gods." (1348-1350)

complications?

some complications: Ismene refuses to help Antigone, Creon publicly forbids Polyneices’ burial, the Chorus agrees to respect Creon’s wishes, the guard informs Creon that his command has been disobeyed, Creon sends him in search of the perpetrator, the guard captures Antigone, Creon orders her execution.  Haemon argues with Creon, Creon ignores him and buries Antigone alive, Tyresias warns Creon.

Here I think is the moment of crisis from which there is no turning back.  If Creon listens to Tyresias, he might still be able to prevent anyone from dying and undo the offense he has committed against the gods.  Instead, Creon ignores and insults the prophet, leading to Tyresias’ dooming prophesy.  Despite Creon’s reluctant change of heart, he cannot act quickly enough to prevent the ensuing suicides of Antigone, Haemon, and the queen, leading to Creon’s ultimate downfall.