Skip to content

Month: August 2019

Riggio Charisma Response

I find the fact that there is no one agreed-upon definition of charisma fascinating. Charisma is something that I think most people can understand in an abstract sense, yet it is so difficult to describe, in words, exactly what it is, and precisely what makes a person charismatic. The reason I believe that charisma is so hard to definitively define is that charisma, in layman’s terms, is more so a “vibe” you perceive from someone, not something necessarily discernible at first glance. There is a multitude of traits and factors that make one charismatic, such as being animated, confident, enthusiastic, ambitious, and inspirational. Only demonstrating one of these traits does not make someone necessarily charismatic. Yet, perceiving someone to be charismatic somehow makes them all of these things, as well as credible, whether they are or not. This perception of charisma is what makes people that hold the trait some of the most successful leaders in history. 

The spectrum of charisma also appears to be very polar in nature. I believe that most people would agree that one is either charismatic or not, there is not much of an in-between; someone who is slightly charismatic. What is fascinating, though, is that people who are more reserved and in fact, less charismatic are drawn towards people who are charismatic, similar to the relationship between sheep and their shepherd. On the contrary; however, the most charismatic leaders immerse themselves in their followings and often portray themselves as being “one of them,” despite quite obviously being very different from the rest of their following.

The idea that one of the first definitions of the word, in a religious context, means “a divine gift of grace,” particularly intrigues me. It explains a lot about one of the most common perceptions of charisma as a component of character. The word “divine” implies that the trait is given by God himself, giving it an element of unattainability, contrary to things such as intelligence or responsibility, which can be developed with age and discipline. However, seeing that children often turn out to be the product of their environment, I find that the current perception of charisma could not be further from the truth.

 

1 Comment

Poster for Charisma Readings: Susan Nevin

In this week’s readings, the focus was on charisma, and how that quality helps to create a good leader. According to Ronald Riggio, the word charisma actually dates back to religious movements that include Moses, Jesus, the Buddha, and more. The word charisma is thought to mean a “divine gift from grace,” and those who possess charisma hold a magical quality.  In addition, German sociologist Max Weber believed that those with charisma were able to hold command over people using their charm and likable nature, which he argued would enchant others. When someone has charisma, they are usually also seen as role models, and their followers look up to them in a way they would an older sibling or a parent. A charismatic leader, according to these articles, emulates a certain type of person that many people aspire to be. 

When someone possess charisma, they also possess many other positive traits. When someone is a charismatic leader, they are not always but usually very smart, intelligent, and communicate maturely and effective with their partner. Not everyone possess these traits, therefore when someone does, they usually become a successful leader. People who are charismatic also are very good at making positive first impressions, and therefore have people supporting them and believing in them before it is even needed. However, it is one thing to be a charismatic person, and another to be a charismatic leader.

For someone to lead a group of people, they need to be much more than charming and funny, but need to have the emotional stability and maturity to handle the decisions of a group. To become a charismatic leader, Ronald Riggio believes that it is a combination of choosing to be a leader, and being born to be a leader. Riggio claims that while one may have the qualities needed to be a charismatic leader, one needs to choose to pursue that path, and stay driven and motivation in that direction to succeed and stand out in a crowd.

1 Comment

Charisma Post

In the reading, charisma is defined in many ways. In the Encyclopedia of Leadership, charisma is defined as a “quality” people have that in one way or another affects people. Something I found interesting was that the first mentioning of “charisma” is in spiritual or religious texts and defined as supreme. Today, charisma is more of a combination of skills that make one more or less appealing or fit to be a leader.

As I was reading I could not stop thinking about leaders in history that clearly showed charisma but their effects on the world were horrible. Hitler, for example, was an extremely charismatic person. Hitler was good with words, amazing at speeches, and was able to convince multitudes of people that the Jewish people were to blame for the downfalls of Germany. More importantly, however, as stated in the reading, charismatic people are “committed to a cause.” Hitler was charismatic because he not only had a way with words and persuasion but was very passionate about the goals he had in eliminating a whole race of people.

While many think charisma is something or a golden trait some people are just born with, it was surprising to me that studies show that I can be developed.

Leave a Comment