It was formed in 1987 in an attempt to combat the ozone depletion. So far, it has been successful. The Global North agreed to pay for some of the Global South’s cost since these costs would be cheaper than dealing with carbon emissions in the future.
Established in 1987, this is the agreement on protection of the ozone layer in which states pledge to reduce and then eliminate use of chloroflouocarbons, or more commonly referred to as CFC's. It represents the most successful environmental treaty to date.
Combined, we have a 4/4.
An agreement made in 1987 pertaining to protection of the ozone layer in which states pledged to reduce and then eliminate use of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs.) The Global North agreed to pay for some of the Global South's cost since these costs would be cheaper than dealing with carbon emissions in the future. It is the most successful environmental treaty to date.
An agreement formed in 1987 in order to prevent ozone depletion. It eleimated the use of CFCs. The North agreed to pay for some of the South’s costs.
As opposed to the kyoto protocol, the montreal protocol was much more successful due to the imminent danger that CFC’s were causing. The member states saw the elinination of these gases as a high priority, and nearly every nation had a reason to be aware and consciously helping the effort. The kyoto protocol was more concerned with global warming, whose effects are somtimes tougher to quantify, and has a broader time scale (aka the future) as to when the world will suffer from its full effects. Because people do not currently see an active threat, international attention was down which made the effort less successful.
It was formed in 1987 in an attempt to combat the ozone depletion. So far, it has been successful. The Global North agreed to pay for some of the Global South’s cost since these costs would be cheaper than dealing with carbon emissions in the future.
Established in 1987, this is the agreement on protection of the ozone layer in which states pledge to reduce and then eliminate use of chloroflouocarbons, or more commonly referred to as CFC's. It represents the most successful environmental treaty to date.
Combined, we have a 4/4.
An agreement made in 1987 pertaining to protection of the ozone layer in which states pledged to reduce and then eliminate use of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs.) The Global North agreed to pay for some of the Global South's cost since these costs would be cheaper than dealing with carbon emissions in the future. It is the most successful environmental treaty to date.
An agreement formed in 1987 in order to prevent ozone depletion. It eleimated the use of CFCs. The North agreed to pay for some of the South’s costs.
As opposed to the kyoto protocol, the montreal protocol was much more successful due to the imminent danger that CFC’s were causing. The member states saw the elinination of these gases as a high priority, and nearly every nation had a reason to be aware and consciously helping the effort. The kyoto protocol was more concerned with global warming, whose effects are somtimes tougher to quantify, and has a broader time scale (aka the future) as to when the world will suffer from its full effects. Because people do not currently see an active threat, international attention was down which made the effort less successful.