Blog Post April 1st

For The Living Room Candidate assignment, I was assigned the 2004 election between Bush and Kerry. More specifically, I was assigned to look at the ads released by Bush, the Republican, in this presidential election race. One of the ads that stuck out to me was an ad in which Bush described what he saw as faults in Kerry’s approach to National Security. In the ad, Bush appears to be appealing to people’s sense of patriotism, for he says things such as “As our troops defend America in the War on Terror”, indicating that Kerry either doesn’t care or cares less about these troops. Bush continues to use this patriotic appeal by discussing how Kerry opposed different types of military weapons made here in Florida. Firstly, this continues to appeal to people’s patriotic desires, for it emphasizes how the weapons were made in the United States, in Florida, and uses an accusatory tone that appears to almost see this refusal of American-made weapons as unpatriotic and bad for the country. Additionally, by listing these weapons that. appear to have fancy, “military-like” names, the ad gives the audience a sense that these weapons are very important to the war, and not having them is incredibly detrimental, while in reality, it is likely that people watching do not even know exactly what these weapons are, or how they would help. Additionally, Bush adds the fact that Kerry opposed extra body gear for soldiers as again an appeal to Americans patriotism, for it frames Kerry as caring little for the sacrifices of the military. Lastly, as a whole, this ad does not give any information about Bush’s policies; instead, it focuses on making his competitor, Kerry, look worse, and thus Bush looks better in comparison.

3 thoughts on “Blog Post April 1st

  1. Helen Strigel

    I too have always noticed that televised political campaign ads usually focus on bringing down the opposing candidate rather than providing information about the one who made the ad. Sometimes I can’t believe that our ‘lizard brains’ still fall for those kinds of tactics.

  2. Sophia Hartman

    I’m really interested in the use of attack ads in different campaigns, it feels like this one used some of the opponents stances to put them in a bad light, however, some I watched were more about just taking comments from the opponent that put them in a bad light, regardless of if their were political connections to what they were saying. It’s interesting to see the different approaches to attack ads, and it makes me curious about if there are different moral factors to different types of attack ads, rather than just a moral argument about attack ads as a whole.

  3. Regan McCrossan

    This is really interesting beacuase I saw Reagan take on the patriotic appeal as well. In order to influence his audience, Reagan talked about leadership and freedom more than he talked about issues within the country. His democrat opponent took more of the political approach touching on taxes and warfare.

Comments are closed.