Building Names – Extra Credit

I’m not surprised at this point anymore when the university makes decisions like this. The way I interpret those emails is that the university does not want to make these changes to “protect their image”. It is obvious that the university is still salivating for money, even though they have much more than they need. Eventually, the people, alumni, donors, and even major benefactors will die, and with them, this so-called “need” to keep these names. If the university does not change its ways, current students and recent alumni will choose not to support a university that fails to listen to students. The fact of the matter is that the people who are making these decisions are not living through what current students are living through on a daily basis. They should not be the ones making the decisions. Students are deeply offended and hurt by the history of both Ryland and Freeman. It’s time for a change. 

One thought on “Building Names – Extra Credit

  1. Miriam Gilman

    I agree with your point on the money front. For some reason, that always is the focus when they should focus on their students. I personally don’t love being a student at an institution that fails to listen to what we want. The school should realize that their behavior is making students want to choose to not support them and I wonder how they would feel if they started losing tuition money just to protect donors…

Comments are closed.