Podcast Blog Post 1

Since normative ethics are universal or cultural truths, universal rules of good and bad, and relative ethics are rules of good and bad to each individual person, there are countless of ethics and truths that one needs to consider on a daily basis. Now when talking about normative and relative ethics, what stood out to me the most in the podcast was that in America, and I’m sure in other countries as well, we can’t even decide on what our laws should be. Throughout the recent election year, I have often thought about the two political parties and why our country is so divided. How is it possible for people to be on such opposite ends of the spectrum with every law, amendment, and decision? How can two people who live in the same neighborhood think so differently, as if they lived on different planets? However, listening to this podcast helped me understand this better.

I grew up in Finland, a small country where 97% of the population is white, Lutheran, and agrees on most political decisions and laws. However, the U.S is such a large country that there are millions of cultural groups within just one state, let alone the entire country. There are so many cultural differences in different geographical areas in the U.S that there is so much room for ethical differences and division within the country. No wonder the country is so divided because if everyone is following their cultural relativism and their own individual ethics, there are so many truths and rules to consider. On top of that, one person can belong to multiple groups, which only expands their exposure to different ethical beliefs. Someone could be Muslim, live in the South, and be a healthcare worker. Between those three, there can be countless of normative ethical differences within one person’s life.

Then we have collective rules, like most people can agree that murder is wrong. But what about our own individual ethics. For example, under murder, there are topics such as abortion. Most people collectively agree that murder is wrong, but is abortion murder? What if the woman was raped, does that make a difference? What about the death penalty? Should someone be sent to death because they killed someone, an eye for an eye? Some people think yes, some people completely disagree. There are so many things to consider and so many cultural and individual ethics that it can often lead to intense disagreements even between family members who grew up in the same household. With America being such a large country with so many different cultural groups, it makes more sense to me now why it is easier for America to quickly become very divided.

3 thoughts on “Podcast Blog Post 1

  1. Leah Kulma

    The perspective you have from Finland being mostly homogenous in religion and race is really interesting to me in the context of normative ethics. As someone who has always lived in the US, I can’t imagine a society that always has someone disagreeing with the majority, or a vote coming down to only two percentage points because or relative ethics are all so different.

  2. Evie Hanson

    Your perspective is really interesting particularly when comparing Finland to the US. The US is certainly interesting when it comes to millions of people with all sorts of backgrounds giving people different opinions when it comes to what is ethical and not. This is definitely apparent as you said politically seen throughout various debates over abortion and the death penalty. It is crazy to see how these opinions surface both on the larger national scale vs. on a smaller scale in small communities even like college campuses. These differences can appear in our classrooms or even in a simple conversation with a friend with whom we thought we shared a lot of similarities with.

  3. William Shapiro

    Your comparison of the US and Finland brings up a good point. Even as someone who has lived in the US for my entire life, I am amazed at how many of “my” morals are actually learned derived from the opinions of others in some way. Humans are so malleable. We are evolutionarily designed to adapt and fit in to different social environments. The natural inclination to belong and have a strong identity simultaneously allows us to be influenced by others, and to unflinchingly lock on to a set of arbitrary beliefs or morals.

Comments are closed.