Author Archives: Ashley Soos

Quote

Mind Games: Are Your Eyes Playing Tricks on You?

The Science Behind Visual Illusions

Visual illusions may seem like they are deceptive tricks that are being played on your mind. However, it seems that visual illusions are the norm rather than a novel exception. While visual illusions provide entertaining examples of this phenomena, it is known that the perception of the brain can often be different from the physical reality. Understanding that what we perceive with our vision may be different than the physical environment is essential in order to process the science behind visual illusions. In order to understand how our brains create these different images, it is necessary to be aware of how visual processing works.


The Process of Vision

imagesThe visual process begins with light bouncing off of an object. Light then passes through the cornea, which is the clear outer part of the eye. The cornea refracts the light rays as they pass through the pupil, which is the black part of the eye. The iris then expands or contracts to control the amount of light that passes through. The light then goes towards the retina, which contains specialized cells, called rods and cones, to detect the light.  Rods and cones convert the light rays into electrical signals that are sent through the optic nerve. The brain then processes the electrical                                                                             signals in the optic nerve to create an image.


So, Why Do Visual Illusions Happen?

The entirety of the visual process discussed above takes about one-tenth of a second. Clearly, the brain undergoes many steps in processing an image of the environment that it is seeing. In order to do all of this so quickly, the brain has many shortcuts that allows for the interpretation of the electrical signals from the optic nerve extremely quickly.

These shortcuts have an evolutionary basis. Our vision is essential in being aware and alert in an environment. Our brains must be proficient in quickly processing information and making judgements on them. Therefore, instead of focusing on everything in the visual field, these shortcuts allow the brain to focus on what is important.

The embedded video provides a concise explanation of the visual process and its evolutionary basis. The video includes the scientific explanation of several popular visual illusions with such as the Hering Illusion, Mach Band Illusion, Hermin Grid, and Peripheral Drift.

As the video mentioned, visual illusions can apply to differences in perception in terms of color, shape, motion, and more. Chapter 5 (Ward, 2015) provides many interesting examples through visual illusion of how our mind uses these shortcuts to quickly process visual information.


The Kanizsa Illusion

2000px-Kanizsa_triangle.svg

Do you automatically perceive a white triangle that is not really there?

Explanation: This effect is caused by illusory or subject contours. Illusory contours are believed to be caused by early visual cortical regions such as V1 and V2. These types of visual illusions cause the brain to perceive an edge when there is no edge present. An alternate explanation for the Kanizsa Illusion has its basis in the Gestalt theory, which states that similar objects are usually perceived as parts of a whole. Therefore, based on the Gestalt principle of good continuation and closure, we ignore the gaps in the triangle edge to interpret a whole image.

Rubin Vase Illusion

images

Do you see a vase or faces in this image? Or both?

Explanation: This studied can be explained by how visual processing works to preserve perceptual stability. This illusion is an example of figure-ground segregation. The brain processes a visual display by segmenting into objects and background surfaces. In this case, if the white is seen as the background, the brain would interpret the faces as the object. If the black is seen as the background, the brain would interpret the vase as an object. By shifting attention to different sets of contours, the brain can experience a “perceptual flip” that allows for the interpretation of both objects.

The Thatcher Illusion

giphyWhat is wrong with this image?

Explanation: The brain processes face in a holistic manner. This holistic processing, especially with an inverted image, hinders the brain from detecting changes in the face. We tend to view the face through top-down processing, which means we view the face as a whole image rather than multiple parts. When the image is viewed right-side up, the anomalies (such as inversion of the eyes and mouth) in the left photo become obvious. Because we are used to viewing faces from an upright orientation, we store faces in the brain upright as well- which makes it hard to see the abnormalities with an upside-down face.


Visual Illusions: Trick or Treat?

It may seem like visual illusions are evidence that there is a lot of room for errors in perception and mistakes in visual processing. However, the awareness of these illusions display a great deal of information regarding how visual processing works within the brain. Through the illusions listed above, we learn a lot about how the brain strives to interpret images as a whole using different methods to create a full image. It is clear that the brain jumps to conclusions in order to process information in the most efficient and fastest way possible.

Always remember, what you see is not always what you get! 

 

Video

Hemispheric Dominance

right-brain-left-brain-fnl-598x441

In popular culture and media, the idea of hemispheric dominance has created a misunderstanding of brain function. One of the most popular misconceptions is the idea that hemispheric dominance is connected to personality type. This idea entirely oversimplifies the idea of the lateralization of brain function. In the widespread pop-culture version of hemispheric dominance, certain personality traits are assigned specifically to one side of the brain. Left-brained people are assumed to be logical, analytic, strategic, and practical. Right-brained people are understood to be passionate, creative, intuitive, and emotional. This idea is so infiltrated into popular belief that one search of “hemispheric dominance” yield pages and pages of results for left brain vs. right brain dominance tests. The amount of these tests indicate how many people are using these to evaluate their own way of thinking and behavior on a measure that has no scientific truth behind it.  It is essential that people understand the neuroscience behind brain function in order to debunk the myth behind the lateralization of brain function.

brainz10In order to analyze the concept of hemispheric dominance it is imperative to understand the history of split-brain experiments. In the early 1960’s Roger Sperry worked extensively with a severely epileptic patient that had his corpus collosum split. Sperry discovered that certain activities could only be accomplished when using one side of the brain, thus the concept of laterality. Laterality means the dominance of one side of the brain in controlling particular activities or functions.

Sperry’s experiment led to a whole new branch of research aimed towards laterality and hemispheric dominance. Previous research has shown that language processing for 95% of people is mostly located in the left hemisphere in the form of Broca’s and Wernicke’s areas. The right hemisphere has proven to be responsible for spatial awareness along with memory, attention, and problem solving. Another intricacy involved with hemispheric dominance is contralateral control otumblr_l7mbpokt1x1qb6etto1_400f motor control, vision, and language.

Sperry’s research best describes contralateral cognitive processes. Images were flashed in front of subjects with severed corpus collosa. When an image was flashed in the subject’s right visual field (RVF) the image was being processed in the left hemisphere. Since language processes are generally based in the left hemisphere, the subject could verbally recall the object flashed in front of them. However, since motor control is usually based in the right hemisphere, the subject could not draw the object when prompted. When an image was flashed in front of the subject’s left visual field then the right hemisphere processed it. The contralateral processing resulted in an inability to verbally recall the object but the ability to draw the object remained in tact. Although there are well-documented instances of lateralization, there are also cognitive abilities that are ipsilateral. The most common example is olfactory processing.

Whilst it is true that each hemisphere of the brain has certain functional specializations, the substandard understanding of the existence of lateralization has lead pop psychological articles to depict the brain as being divided into two separate parts, almost independent of each other. This is a myth.

Pseudo-psychology often suggests that individuals are either ‘right-brained’ or ‘left-brained’ depending on their personality type, and often determine this from their jobs and personal life. For example, pop psychologists might be inclined to tell a musician that he is a ‘right brained’, whist telling a math teacher he is ‘left brained’. This is a massively over simplified understanding of how the two sides of the brain interact. For example linguistic functioning is associated with just the left side of the brain, but in reality the right side contributes a huge amount. Recent studies have indicated that individuals with damage to their right hemisphere often have trouble with semantics, and a reduced ability for metaphor appreciation, both vital aspects of language comprehension.

ku-xlargeIn reality it appears that most basic cognitive processes utilize both sides of the brain, and the idea that an individual can being either left or right sided, is a huge exaggeration. The two hemispheres are massively interconnected by the corpus callosum as well as other bands of nerve fibers, which connect both sides of the brain. These allow many of the brain processes to span across both sides, and create a more holistic idea of consciousness.