What are we learning in high school history class?

From our last class discussion about the “staging” of Rosa Parks’ bus boycott, to recalling our realization that MLK was not a one man band who single-handedly crafted the civil rights movement, it shocks me to think about how much our text books glazed over America’s historical truth.  When I think of the history that most of us learned in elementary school, the only thing that comes to mind is: “Columbus sailed the ocean blue in 1492”.

In part II of Chapter 7, we learn just how dark the shadow of World War II is. In incidents like explosion that killed 202 navy seamen in July 1944 at the Port Chicago, San Francisco, the United States government treated black soldiers with no human dignity (273). Branding black soldiers as rapists when there was no substantial evidence (272). Removing all dignity. Violent, widespread lynchings. Intense voter intimidation… Before this class, I didn’t have an accurate perception how inhumanely the government, and many American citizens, treated black Americans throughout history. As the NAACP worked to end discrimination and secure full citizenship for black Americans, widespread violence is still going on.  Why didn’t we learn about this extreme violence in high school!

Another thing that came up in our last class discussion was how hard it must have been to be an organization like the NAACP to be fighting against a system that is completely set against you.  It’s so eye-opening to hear these stories and to begin to feel the experience of black Americans in the 20th century. To gain a better picture of living every day in fear for your life and knowing that if any white person accused you of something you could probably not defend your innocence. In Chapter 7 and 8, we see Marshall working tirelessly to defend and advocate for black Americans through the NAACP.  In just the year 1944, he traveled more than 42,000 miles working for social justice (286).  His steadfast and determined character in such a time of danger speaks to incredible leadership.

As the wartime oppression turned into a demand for “justice now,” this line stuck out for me: “if black men and women rejected the idea of being a ruled group, they ‘must be willing to make every sacrifice necessary to retain the right to vote’” (285). We’ve never lived through a time when our population has had to fight for the right to vote, so it’s easy for the full importance of suffrage to escape us. Truly comparing our own lives to the lives of the black Americans of the civil war era, is eye opening to say the least.

How many of you have taken your full citizenship for granted?  Did you learn about the true civil rights history in high school (if you did, was it just a really good teacher?) Although Prof. Fergeson was joking, it really does seem like we need college history to correct, or give a more complete story, to what we’ve learned in the past. Drawing from chapters 7 and 8, what are some things that you learned that you didn’t know before, and you think you should have known? Any comments on the seeming inadequacy of high school history classes?

– Caitlin

Justice Now?

As World War II came to an end, the work of the NAACP was only beginning to gain ground.  A nucleus of strong leadership composed of Walter White, Thurgood Marshall, Ella Baker, Roy Wilkins, and W.E.B. Du Bois had emerged to move forward the NAACP’s overarching goal: “to end racial discrimination and secure full citizenship for black Americans” (Sullivan 293). Du Bois, despite a few years absence, was asked by White to represent the black voice in anticolonial movements, and he agreed (292).

Together, Marshall and Baker emerged as the frontrunners of the field campaign. “Both shared an understanding that, as Marshall bluntly put it, ‘the NAACP can move no faster than the individuals who have been discriminated against’” (Sullivan 295). The two uplifted communities by nurturing local leaders—Marshall through local lawyers and Baker through community members at large (295) Throughout this period, the NAACP played a central role in garnering the attention of the U.S. Department of Justice and began to see rewards from their efforts.

Fast forward to today. As the murder of Trayvon Martin continues to garner media attention, a quick Google search of “Trayvon Martin + NAACP” offers 823 results. Just like in the days of Marshall and Baker, members of the NAACP have traveled to Florida to hear the personal accounts of community members. Within one article titled, “Community speaks out against Sanford officials following death of Trayvon Martin,” from ABC Action News, one of the attendees shares the following statement: “The Justice Department needs to come and clean all of Sanford up. They need to take all the judges and most of them need to go.”

It is disheartening to know that a half-century since the prime NAACP organizing of Baker and Marshall, there are still communities struggling to overcome institutionalized injustice. While it is somewhat comforting to know that the NAACP continues to respond to cases of injustice, an inkling of optimism—or naivety—continues to hope there would be no need for the NAACP to respond to any issues dealing with the justice system (because there wouldn’t be any), and that ferries and ponies and princesses could again populate the world. As social media outlets, friends, and classmates continue to discuss the case, the thought of the individual’s role—and more importantly MY role—within the protest consistently emerges.

WWED? (What would Ella [Baker] do?) If this case were being read in a textbook instead of in the news, what would the desired response of young Americans be? It is doubtful that it would be limited to casual conversations over coffee and scrolling through timelines and feeds.

Read the full article here: http://www.abcactionnews.com/dpp/news/community-speaks-out-against-sanford-officials-following-death-of-trayvon-martin