Link

Doing it all at Once: The Myths versus the Realities of Multi-Tasking

EXECUTIVE FUNCTION: TASK SWITCHING AND MULTI-TASKING

Executive functions serve one ultimate purpose; to conduct an individual’s most crucial cognitive processes.  The functions instruct multiple regions to perform, or be silenced, and is constantly coordinating the synchronization of activity, further optimizing an individual’s performance in the series of everyday internal and external communication and action. More specifically, is theorized to be an outcome of multiple competing biases rather than the presence of a controller. Decisions may arise out of interaction out of an interaction between bottom-up processing and top-down processing.

Before delving into the functions involved with task switching multi-tasking and the potential dangers it is first imperative to establish the role of schemas within executive function. A schema, or an organized set of stored information, is essential in creating and carrying out our everyday tasks. Schemas are both constantly being created as well as automated. Due to the fact that certain schemas can become automatically retrieved, individuals are then able to task switch at a rapid rate. By definition, task switching is when one discards of a previous schema and establishes a new one. During an individual’s everyday routine, task switching is being constantly stimulated. For example, and to put it simply, an individual will focus on achieving one specific goal after another. A multi-dimensional extension of task switching, multitasking, the main subject of discussion, can be regarded as an individual maintaining future goals while current goals are being dealt with. According to Psychology Today, there is an extensive debate regarding the validity of the term “multi-tasking.” For years, researchers have been investigating whether multi-tasking is truly an ability we can cognitively balance.

FOUR MAJOR AREAS INVOLVED IN TASK SWITCHING

During task switching, activity in the brain is stimulated in four major areas. First the pre-frontal cortex, which is involved in shifting and focusing your attention, and selecting which task to do when. Next, the posterior parietal lobe activates rules for each task you switch to, the anterior cingulate gyrus monitors errors, and the pre-motor cortex is preparing for you to move in some way.

2000px-Gray726-Brodman-prefrontal.svgGray726_superior_parietal_lobuleGray727_anterior_cingulate_corteximages

 

 

 

 

 

 

Due to the number of circuits stimulated to decode retrieved information and subsequently acted upon, multi-tasking is far less efficient than we believe is possible. Most of the time we are overestimating our multi-tasking abilities. In this clip presented below, Ellen Degeneres does a comical sketch on the “Challenges of Multi-tasking.”

ELLEN DEGENERES: CHALLANGES OF MULTI-TASKING

While this monologue is an over exaggeration of multi-asking for the purpose of comic relief, the majority of what she touches on, accurately reflects our technologically dominated society and its effects on individuals. Increasingly, technology allows the individual to believe they can achieve multiple tasks at once. Unfortunately, there is great error to our trials in attempt to conquer all our goals at once. According to Dr. Gary Small, Professor of Psychiatry and Aging at the UCLA School of Medicine, the mental process related to multitasking called partial continuous attention (PCA) is difficult to resist because “our dopamine circuits that are involved in reward systems drive it because we want that exciting new bit of information.” Naturally our minds are evolutionarily driven to achieve our immediate goals. Therefore, because we are given a numerable amount of tools to see these goals through, we do not hesitate to seek informational stimulus and the following internal satisfaction achieved once it is obtained.

DANGERS OF MULTI-TASKING: EXCESSIVE STIMULATION

Although our desire to seek out constant motive and reward is encouraging, it is becomes unrealistic when we are cognitively unable to balance the excessive stimulus self-generated and sought out. The three main consequences that follow multi-tasking, are lack of focus, increased stressed levels, and memory impairment.

LACK OF FOCUS

When ones concentrated train of thought is disrupted by multiple distractions, “it requires more time to come back to one task, find where you left off, and try to recreate your thought pattern” (C, Deeb., Demand Media).

35256daa5e229676a91abee5e8c7883aeb6b3f664ce85c05e0199cc41aeb096b

For example, someone is driving using a GPS system for direction, then the passenger in the back asks the driver a question, but the music’s too loud. Suddenly, the driver all at once, does not want to miss their freeway exit, but wants to answer the passengers question, yet needs to turn down the music to do so. This circumstance, which many have endured, can easily end in an accident.

MEMORY IMPAIRMENT

When different forms of information are being delivered to an individual simultaneously, your brain is unable to differentiate between what is important and what isn’t, therefore damaging possibly both your short and long-term memory.

MemoryLossAhead

An example of this goes as follows; one night a student’s favorite show premieres on television that they have been dying to watch. However, they desperately need to do their math homework, therefore the student does both. Consequently, the student ends up doing both “tasks” half satisfactory as they originally wanted, not truly understanding the meaning or purpose of either one.

STRESS LEVEL INCREASE

As we have all experienced, the more responsibilities thrown at us, the more intense our stress becomes. “Anxiety [is] associated with multitasking… reducing productivity and can negatively impact..” the personal environment an individual interacts with and responds to.

images

CONCLUDING STATEMENT 

In all fairness to those who multi-task, it can be achieved. According to Ward, when an individual preforms one automated task while balancing another that the individual is not equally as proficient at, it is possible to achieve positive results. We have all been in that moment when we need to get tasks done in the most timely manner viable. However, the take away? Never believe those who self-proclaim they are an “the ultimate multi-tasker.” Walk away feeling bad for them as more bad than good comes from engaging in it.

 

REFERENCES

Ward, J. (2015) The Student’s Guide to Cognitive Neuroscience. Psychology Press, London and New York. 3rd ed. pp352-354

The True Cost of Multi-Tasking 

May I Have Your Partial Continuous Attention Please? (The Dangers of Multitasking and Mental Stress)

Bad Effects of Multi-Tasking

 

 

 

What the duck is wrong with your speech?

What makes your brain let out words you never wanted to say?

george-bush

They misunderestimated me. – George W. Bush

Freud’s Theory On The Unconscious Mind

Sigmund Freud, the controversial Austrian psychologist credited as the father of psychoanalysis, attributed verbal gaffes to underlying subconscious motives.  Freud founded the theory that conflict between the conscious perception of reality and the motives of the unconscious mind causes unintended revelations of repressed material.  These miscues, or parapraxes,  are referred to as Freudian slips and they have haunted public speeches, celebrity interviews, and everyday conversations alike.

The Science Behind The Slips

freud

Researchers have debunked the majority of Freudian theories but the cognitive causes of linguistic slips remains.  Cognitive scientist Gary Dell uses the interactions between three linguistic networks (lexical, phonological, and semantic) to explain his viewpoint.  Dell believes the three networks do not always sync correctly during “spreading activation”, which can impede their functionality.  When the networks get in each others way, linguistic slips result.  Dell maintains that slips of the tongue are proof of dexterity of the human mind.

A second perspective focused on the unconscious mind comes from Daniel Wegner.  He believes that the more you attempt to suppress a thought into your unconscious mind, the more your conscious mind has to regulate it.  Consequentially, by trying so hard to not say something, you end up letting it loose.  Wegner and his contemporary, Michael Motley, hypothesize that the harder you try to suppress a thought, the more vulnerable you are to saying it.  Also, slips are exponentially more likely when you are in a distracting environment.

Freudian Ships Are Everywhere

No one is immune to parapraxis.  Videos and transcripts have caught prominent politicians making embarrassing slips of the tongue.

Celebrities too.

kanye-west-first-tweet

Kanye later justified his typographical error saying, “Lol I spelled Silicon wrong (I guess I was still thinking about the other type of silicone.)”

References:

https://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/201203/slips-the-tongue

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/best-freudian-slips-linguistic-gaffes-3206919

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2161115/Theory-Freudian-slip-confirmed-experiments-new-research-claims.html

 

 

WHAT WAS THAT MOVIE CALLED??

Memory and amnesia

Memory deficits are extremely common. They can occur for various reasons such as: car accidents, head trauma, viral infection, surgery, and old age. The more common form of memory loss that we tend to think of is amnesia. There are a few types of amnesia, anterograde, retrograde and clinical amnesia. Anterograde amnesia is when the amnesics have memory problems in terms of learning new information post brain injury. The second form of amnesia is retrograde amnesia. Retrograde amnesia is when the person has problems remembering information from before the brain injury. Clinical amnesia tends to affect both memory for events that happened prior to injury (retrograde memory) and learning new information (anterograde memory), although relatively selective impairments can be found. The severity can vary from case to case and it mainly from damage in and around the medial temporal lobes.

Neuroscience of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the search for endophenotypes

Amnesia and Movies

I am sure most of us can think about it and recall a movie (we are using memory recall everyday!) they have scene where the main character has some sort of memory deficit or amnesia. Lets take a look at one movie where the main character has a severe memory deficit. Can you identify what his problem is??

Momento Memory Scene: Will you remember me?

If you said total anterograde amnesia than you got it right! Anterograde amnesia prevents the main character, Leonard, from forming new memories ever since his accident. He received a head injury while intervening in a confrontation to protect his wife. Leonard remembers the accident but is unable to form short-term memories ever since that day. Each day he wakes up unable to remember anything from before his accident.

Amnesia and Violence

There are selective difficulties in amnesia. Particularly if retrograde amnesia is organic (from brain injury) or psychogenic origin related to extreme stress. There has been large controversy over whether psychogenic amnesia can arise after committing a violent crime. People who commit violent crimes sometimes claim that they have no recollection of doing it. While amnesia can damage the ability to form new memories, previous skills learned before the accident are expected to be preserved. (In Jason Bourne’s Case from The Bourne Identity, super flying martial arts skills/ language skills/ weaponry skills)

http://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/bourne/images/7/7e/Jason_Bourne.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20080716210458

Amnesia is often depicted in movies with characters losing their identities or changing personalities. This is not the case with amnesia from a neurlogical origin. With neurological brain damage, usually to damage to the; medial temporal lobes, hippocampus, and orbitofrontal regions. When damage occurs to these regions, one’s sense of identity is preserved and they are usually able to accurately reflect on their own personality traits. Therefore, if you ever see someone doing anything violent, make sure to check there brain anatomy. If that is in tact, maybe check their BAC!

 

References:

Youtube.com: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgGf5X8-j1s

http://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/bourne/images/7/7e/Jason_Bourne.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20080716210458

Ward, Jamie. The Student’s Guide to Cognitive Neuroscience. 3rd Edition (2015)

Video

Selective Attention: Can you spot the obvious?

It is a natural assumption we all make, that when our eyes are open, we are ‘seeing’ everything in our visual field. However this is not often the case.

Before you continue reading, watch the following video and count how many times the players dressed in white pass the ball to each other.

The correct answer is that they pass the ball to each other 15 times, but the real question is, did you see the gorilla? If the answer is no… go back and watch the video again but this time without focusing on the number of passes the players make. But don’t worry if you didn’t spot him the first time! This video is based an experiment performed by Daniel Simons and Christopher Chabris in 1999 and they found that amazingly 50% of their participants failed to notice the gorilla. So what is it that causes us to miss such a supposedly obvious feature of the video?


Selective Attention

Attention is the process by which people select certain information from their surrounding environment, and focus in on only that, thereby discarding the rest of the sensory input. This is because we have a limited cognitive capacity, and so have to filter out what we assume to be irrelevant, or else we would be subject to a sensory over load. This is as Broadbent (1958) described it, like the brains way of filtering incoming information. This means that at any given time we are only attending to a select area of our visual field, and often miss large changes in the areas of the environment we are not focusing on. (You now have an excuse when you don’t realise you friend got a new hair cut..!).



Inattentional Blindness

Inattentional blindness is an extension of selective attention, and it claims that without attention no features from our surroundings are perceived at all. Mack and Rock (1998) were among the first psychologists to study this phenomenon, and they argued that it occurred when the participants in their experiments were attending to a specific stimulus, and so were unaware of others presented to them. This suggests that missing an external stimulus in your visual field is no reflection on a deficit in your perceptual abilities, but in your ability to attain. Therefore we concentrate mostly on what we find important, and then simply allow our schemas to fill in the rest.



How can we test this phenomenon?

Mack and Rock Task

Mack and Rock Task

Mack and Rock would show their participants a series of crosses, aligned either horizontally or vertically, and they were asked to determine which arm of the cross was longer. On the critical trial, the cross shows up like all the previous trials, but it is accompanied by a small shape. Afterwards the subjects were  asked if they noticed any shapes other than the cross, and the results showed that  75% of the participants were inattentionally blind when the cross was given parafoveally, and the unexpected shape appeared at the fixation point. In addition to this, they also allowed for an assessment of perception under divided attention, by repeating the experiment, but suggesting to the participants that something other than the cross might appear. This showed that when the subjects were aware that something would change (they attended more to the external environment), they were far more likely to notice the additional shape.



An explanation for Inattentional Blindness

A salient object is one that stands out from the rest, and so because our brain doesn’t have the cognitive capacity to process and retain every stimulus from our environment, we rely on our schemes to fill in the rest, and focus only on those which are salient. A schema in this sense is effectively a mental arrangement of preconceived ideas that develops throughout ones life. This is a very economical approach to perception, as attending to, and cognitively processing only the important aspects of our environment doesn’t over load our cognitive capacity, but does allows us to create a fairly cohesive idea about the world around us.

But why do we miss such as obvgorilla experiementious environmental stimulus, that is the presence of a man dressed as a gorilla?! This answer to this could be due to the fact that it is such an unexpected event, that it completely lacks ecological validity. Therefore because we aren’t expecting it, we are less likely to notice it, as we are attending only to the most salient stimuli.



Whodunnit?!

The following video is taken from a British TV advert, promoting increased attention when driving, and nicely demonstrates our inability to notice changes in our visual field that we are not attending to.

So remember: 
Pay attention!

Quote

Mind Games: Are Your Eyes Playing Tricks on You?

The Science Behind Visual Illusions

Visual illusions may seem like they are deceptive tricks that are being played on your mind. However, it seems that visual illusions are the norm rather than a novel exception. While visual illusions provide entertaining examples of this phenomena, it is known that the perception of the brain can often be different from the physical reality. Understanding that what we perceive with our vision may be different than the physical environment is essential in order to process the science behind visual illusions. In order to understand how our brains create these different images, it is necessary to be aware of how visual processing works.


The Process of Vision

imagesThe visual process begins with light bouncing off of an object. Light then passes through the cornea, which is the clear outer part of the eye. The cornea refracts the light rays as they pass through the pupil, which is the black part of the eye. The iris then expands or contracts to control the amount of light that passes through. The light then goes towards the retina, which contains specialized cells, called rods and cones, to detect the light.  Rods and cones convert the light rays into electrical signals that are sent through the optic nerve. The brain then processes the electrical                                                                             signals in the optic nerve to create an image.


So, Why Do Visual Illusions Happen?

The entirety of the visual process discussed above takes about one-tenth of a second. Clearly, the brain undergoes many steps in processing an image of the environment that it is seeing. In order to do all of this so quickly, the brain has many shortcuts that allows for the interpretation of the electrical signals from the optic nerve extremely quickly.

These shortcuts have an evolutionary basis. Our vision is essential in being aware and alert in an environment. Our brains must be proficient in quickly processing information and making judgements on them. Therefore, instead of focusing on everything in the visual field, these shortcuts allow the brain to focus on what is important.

The embedded video provides a concise explanation of the visual process and its evolutionary basis. The video includes the scientific explanation of several popular visual illusions with such as the Hering Illusion, Mach Band Illusion, Hermin Grid, and Peripheral Drift.

As the video mentioned, visual illusions can apply to differences in perception in terms of color, shape, motion, and more. Chapter 5 (Ward, 2015) provides many interesting examples through visual illusion of how our mind uses these shortcuts to quickly process visual information.


The Kanizsa Illusion

2000px-Kanizsa_triangle.svg

Do you automatically perceive a white triangle that is not really there?

Explanation: This effect is caused by illusory or subject contours. Illusory contours are believed to be caused by early visual cortical regions such as V1 and V2. These types of visual illusions cause the brain to perceive an edge when there is no edge present. An alternate explanation for the Kanizsa Illusion has its basis in the Gestalt theory, which states that similar objects are usually perceived as parts of a whole. Therefore, based on the Gestalt principle of good continuation and closure, we ignore the gaps in the triangle edge to interpret a whole image.

Rubin Vase Illusion

images

Do you see a vase or faces in this image? Or both?

Explanation: This studied can be explained by how visual processing works to preserve perceptual stability. This illusion is an example of figure-ground segregation. The brain processes a visual display by segmenting into objects and background surfaces. In this case, if the white is seen as the background, the brain would interpret the faces as the object. If the black is seen as the background, the brain would interpret the vase as an object. By shifting attention to different sets of contours, the brain can experience a “perceptual flip” that allows for the interpretation of both objects.

The Thatcher Illusion

giphyWhat is wrong with this image?

Explanation: The brain processes face in a holistic manner. This holistic processing, especially with an inverted image, hinders the brain from detecting changes in the face. We tend to view the face through top-down processing, which means we view the face as a whole image rather than multiple parts. When the image is viewed right-side up, the anomalies (such as inversion of the eyes and mouth) in the left photo become obvious. Because we are used to viewing faces from an upright orientation, we store faces in the brain upright as well- which makes it hard to see the abnormalities with an upside-down face.


Visual Illusions: Trick or Treat?

It may seem like visual illusions are evidence that there is a lot of room for errors in perception and mistakes in visual processing. However, the awareness of these illusions display a great deal of information regarding how visual processing works within the brain. Through the illusions listed above, we learn a lot about how the brain strives to interpret images as a whole using different methods to create a full image. It is clear that the brain jumps to conclusions in order to process information in the most efficient and fastest way possible.

Always remember, what you see is not always what you get! 

 

Video

Hemispheric Dominance

right-brain-left-brain-fnl-598x441

In popular culture and media, the idea of hemispheric dominance has created a misunderstanding of brain function. One of the most popular misconceptions is the idea that hemispheric dominance is connected to personality type. This idea entirely oversimplifies the idea of the lateralization of brain function. In the widespread pop-culture version of hemispheric dominance, certain personality traits are assigned specifically to one side of the brain. Left-brained people are assumed to be logical, analytic, strategic, and practical. Right-brained people are understood to be passionate, creative, intuitive, and emotional. This idea is so infiltrated into popular belief that one search of “hemispheric dominance” yield pages and pages of results for left brain vs. right brain dominance tests. The amount of these tests indicate how many people are using these to evaluate their own way of thinking and behavior on a measure that has no scientific truth behind it.  It is essential that people understand the neuroscience behind brain function in order to debunk the myth behind the lateralization of brain function.

brainz10In order to analyze the concept of hemispheric dominance it is imperative to understand the history of split-brain experiments. In the early 1960’s Roger Sperry worked extensively with a severely epileptic patient that had his corpus collosum split. Sperry discovered that certain activities could only be accomplished when using one side of the brain, thus the concept of laterality. Laterality means the dominance of one side of the brain in controlling particular activities or functions.

Sperry’s experiment led to a whole new branch of research aimed towards laterality and hemispheric dominance. Previous research has shown that language processing for 95% of people is mostly located in the left hemisphere in the form of Broca’s and Wernicke’s areas. The right hemisphere has proven to be responsible for spatial awareness along with memory, attention, and problem solving. Another intricacy involved with hemispheric dominance is contralateral control otumblr_l7mbpokt1x1qb6etto1_400f motor control, vision, and language.

Sperry’s research best describes contralateral cognitive processes. Images were flashed in front of subjects with severed corpus collosa. When an image was flashed in the subject’s right visual field (RVF) the image was being processed in the left hemisphere. Since language processes are generally based in the left hemisphere, the subject could verbally recall the object flashed in front of them. However, since motor control is usually based in the right hemisphere, the subject could not draw the object when prompted. When an image was flashed in front of the subject’s left visual field then the right hemisphere processed it. The contralateral processing resulted in an inability to verbally recall the object but the ability to draw the object remained in tact. Although there are well-documented instances of lateralization, there are also cognitive abilities that are ipsilateral. The most common example is olfactory processing.

Whilst it is true that each hemisphere of the brain has certain functional specializations, the substandard understanding of the existence of lateralization has lead pop psychological articles to depict the brain as being divided into two separate parts, almost independent of each other. This is a myth.

Pseudo-psychology often suggests that individuals are either ‘right-brained’ or ‘left-brained’ depending on their personality type, and often determine this from their jobs and personal life. For example, pop psychologists might be inclined to tell a musician that he is a ‘right brained’, whist telling a math teacher he is ‘left brained’. This is a massively over simplified understanding of how the two sides of the brain interact. For example linguistic functioning is associated with just the left side of the brain, but in reality the right side contributes a huge amount. Recent studies have indicated that individuals with damage to their right hemisphere often have trouble with semantics, and a reduced ability for metaphor appreciation, both vital aspects of language comprehension.

ku-xlargeIn reality it appears that most basic cognitive processes utilize both sides of the brain, and the idea that an individual can being either left or right sided, is a huge exaggeration. The two hemispheres are massively interconnected by the corpus callosum as well as other bands of nerve fibers, which connect both sides of the brain. These allow many of the brain processes to span across both sides, and create a more holistic idea of consciousness.

 

Welcome to your Cognitive Neuroscience blog