In Chapter 9: The Policy Connection, Meyer addresses the interaction of movements and the policy process.\u00a0 Using the Bonus Army as an example, Meyer highlights specific techniques employed by protesters in social movements that impact the movements effect on policy.\u00a0 These techniques include: personally carrying their claims to Washington to bring them to the direct attention of policy makers, not giving in to intimidation or efforts to suppress their demonstrations, and using the media to gain allies across the nation.\u00a0 Meyer describes effective demonstrations as an expression of a cause, the representation of a constituency, and the analysis of what should be done.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
One of the main points Meyer highlights throughout this chapter is that social movements influence, develop, and affect politics over a long period of time and often in unexpected ways (165).\u00a0 Social movements often get criticized for not having specific goals and showing no focused means of obtaining their goals or enacting specific changes.\u00a0 However, much of this criticism stems from the issue that social movements cannot create immediate change.\u00a0 Meyer points out that Madison and the other founders purposefully created our political system in a way that slows the process of political change (168).\u00a0 The political policy changes that social movements bring about take a long time to pass through the system and much of the process occurs behind closed doors.\u00a0 Unfortunately, by the time these changes come about, the social movements that called for them are not always given due credit.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Meyer presents an example of this slow political process using the antiwar and antidraft movements of the 1960s.\u00a0 Although draft regulations did not change much during the Vietnam War, they have changed drastically since then.\u00a0 The political fallout resulting from the antiwar movement affected the United States foreign policy for nearly thirty years (167).\u00a0 It also led to more hesitancy before committing troops to foreign missions.\u00a0 In addition, antidraft movements led policy makers and the military to improve the quality of life of military personnel in an effort to attract and accommodate a stable volunteer military force.\u00a0 By the time these changes came about, little credit was given to the activists who participated in those social movements.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Keeping these issues in mind, it is interesting to think about what social movements that have occurred recently and are currently in progress will bring about political change in the future.\u00a0 The OWS movement has been heavily criticized for not having any specific goals and not petitioning for specific changes within the system. \u00a0However, it is possible that major changes stemming from this movement have yet to be seen.\u00a0 What policies may come about that began as reactions to the Occupy movement?<\/p>\n
— Laura Bailey<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
In Chapter 9: The Policy Connection, Meyer addresses the interaction of movements and the policy process.\u00a0 Using the Bonus Army as an example, Meyer highlights specific techniques employed by protesters in social movements that impact the movements effect on policy.\u00a0 … Continue reading