{"id":1054,"date":"2015-02-20T13:59:45","date_gmt":"2015-02-20T18:59:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/playing-at-leadership\/?p=1054"},"modified":"2015-02-27T16:14:35","modified_gmt":"2015-02-27T21:14:35","slug":"a-tiger-cant-change","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/playing-at-leadership\/2015\/02\/20\/a-tiger-cant-change\/","title":{"rendered":"A Tiger Can&#8217;t Change"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>So today it was brought to my attention that there is a fan mod for <em>Dragon Age Inquisition<\/em> that allows players to modify the sexual preferences of the companion characters in the game. Some people are thrilled by this. Some people are really angry about this.<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s look at why.<\/p>\n<p>Only two of the companions are bisexual (Bull and Josephine), and several of them have species preferences (Solas can only be romanced by a female elf, Cullen by a female elf or human). This means that some of the most popular characters are not available for romance with all Inquisitors (Cassandra and Dorian are only available to male Inquisitors; Sera and Blackwall to female Inquisitors; Cole, Vivienne, and Varric to no one).<\/p>\n<p>Those who are thrilled are those who wanted to romance a particular character in the game, but whose Inquisitor was not oriented in that direction.There are accounts online from multiple fans about how they attempted to romance a companion only to be heartbroken because Cassandra or Dorian wouldn&#8217;t date their female Inquisitor, or Cullen or Sera wouldn&#8217;t date their male Inquisitor. This fan mod gives them the opportunity to experience that.<\/p>\n<p>Then there&#8217;s the other side. This side falls into two camps. First, the camp that&#8217;s already horrified that some characters are homosexual or bisexual. They think it&#8217;s disgusting that Cassandra could now be a lesbian, or that Cullen might be gay. I&#8217;m essentially going to dismiss that opinion as bigoted.<\/p>\n<p>Then there&#8217;s my viewpoint, which is that this mod goes against one of the major points being made by the game: people are what they are. They can&#8217;t, and shouldn&#8217;t, be forced to change. In the game, Dorian talks specifically about how his father betrayed him by using blood magic to try to make him straight. That is &#8211; in essence &#8211; what this mod does. It changes the politics (yes, I know, &#8220;politics&#8221; is a dirty word in games right now) and the purpose of part of the game, and I don&#8217;t approve in general of things that change the developers&#8217; intentions (fixing failures is fine &#8211; changing intentions bothers me). It also implies that we can change people to be what we want because it suits us, something that is both false and harmful.<\/p>\n<p>Do I think the person who created the mod should be shamed and harassed? Of course not. But I think it&#8217;s important to remember that even if you can now romance Cassandra or Dorian as a woman, that it goes against one of the most powerful points in the game &#8211; we are what we are, we love who we love, and that can&#8217;t be changed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>So today it was brought to my attention that there is a fan mod for Dragon Age Inquisition that allows players to modify the sexual preferences of the companion characters in the game. Some people are thrilled by this. Some &#8230; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/playing-at-leadership\/2015\/02\/20\/a-tiger-cant-change\/\">Read More &raquo;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1710,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[9130,9134,104,9136],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1054","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-game-criticism","category-gaming-community","category-gender","category-videogames"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6XN03-h0","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/playing-at-leadership\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1054","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/playing-at-leadership\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/playing-at-leadership\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/playing-at-leadership\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1710"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/playing-at-leadership\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1054"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/playing-at-leadership\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1054\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/playing-at-leadership\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1054"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/playing-at-leadership\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1054"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/playing-at-leadership\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1054"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}