{"id":259,"date":"2011-03-25T17:01:19","date_gmt":"2011-03-25T22:01:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/physicsbunn\/?p=259"},"modified":"2011-03-25T17:02:39","modified_gmt":"2011-03-25T22:02:39","slug":"baseball-bats","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/physicsbunn\/2011\/03\/25\/baseball-bats\/","title":{"rendered":"Baseball bats"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s spring, when a young man&#8217;s fancy turns to baseball.<\/p>\n<p>The NCAA (and high schools, I think) changed their standards for baseball bats this year, apparently in response to safety concerns about people (especially pitchers) being hit by fast-moving balls. The change took effect back in January and was decided on long before that, but I just heard about it.<\/p>\n<p>Descriptions of the change are very confusing, at least to a naive physicist. <a href=\"http:\/\/articles.sfgate.com\/2011-03-16\/sports\/28693628_1_new-bat-bat-standards-ball-exit-speed-ratio\">An example<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>So they adopted a standard called the Ball-Bat Coefficient of Restitution (BBCOR), which provides a more accurate measure of bats in lab tests than the old standard, the Ball Exit Speed Ratio (BESR). Rather than measure the ball&#8217;s speed off the bat, BBCOR testing measures the collision between the bat and the ball to see how lively the bat is.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>That distinction is way too subtle for me! What does &#8220;how lively the bat is&#8221; mean, if it doesn&#8217;t mean how fast the ball leaves the bat?<\/p>\n<p>To be more specific, the coefficient of restitution, by definition, is a measure of what fraction of the mechanical energy that was present before a collision remains after the collision. Having a standard that restricts the\u00a0 <em>speed<\/em> of the ball (following a collision under controlled circumstances) is precisely the same thing as having a standard that restricts the <em>energy<\/em> after the collision (i.e., the coefficient of restitution).<\/p>\n<p>Where&#8217;s the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Physics-Baseball-Robert-Kemp-Adair\/dp\/0060950471\">Physicist  to the National League<\/a> when you need him?<\/p>\n<p>Of course, even if the two standards are essentially equivalent, changing from one to the other might be a way to tighten up the standard, without making it explicitly obvious that that&#8217;s what you&#8217;re doing. Maybe that&#8217;s all that&#8217;s going on here.<\/p>\n<p>You can actually read the<a href=\"http:\/\/fs.ncaa.org\/Docs\/rules\/baseball\/bats\/NCAABESRProtocol1.09.pdf\"> old<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/fs.ncaa.org\/Docs\/rules\/baseball\/bats\/NCAA%20BBCOR%20Protocol%20FINAL%205%2009.pdf\">new<\/a> standards, equations and all, if you feel like it. It turns out, as far as I can tell, the headline change, from &#8220;exit speed&#8221; to &#8220;coefficient of restitution,&#8221; really is a bit of a red herring. The COR is a bit of a cleaner thing to measure, because the old standard had to be measured on a sliding scale for different bat sizes, and the new one doesn&#8217;t, but fundamentally they&#8217;re measuring essentially the same thing.<\/p>\n<p>The more important point is that they&#8217;ve also added an <a href=\"http:\/\/fs.ncaa.org\/Docs\/rules\/baseball\/bats\/NCAAABIProcedure.pdf\">accelerated break-in<\/a> procedure to the protocol. Apparently composite bats get springier over use (I guess as the materials get compressed). The old procedure tested them new; the new procedure breaks them in first, so that you can&#8217;t buy a standards-compliant bat and later end up with one that&#8217;s too springy for the standard.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s spring, when a young man&#8217;s fancy turns to baseball. The NCAA (and high schools, I think) changed their standards for baseball bats this year, apparently in response to safety concerns about people (especially pitchers) being hit by fast-moving balls. The change took effect back in January and was decided on long before that, but &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/physicsbunn\/2011\/03\/25\/baseball-bats\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Baseball bats<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-259","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/physicsbunn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/physicsbunn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/physicsbunn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/physicsbunn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/physicsbunn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=259"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/physicsbunn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/physicsbunn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=259"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/physicsbunn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=259"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/physicsbunn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=259"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}