{"id":38,"date":"2018-11-13T16:13:12","date_gmt":"2018-11-13T21:13:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/template-mus122\/?page_id=38"},"modified":"2019-01-04T00:49:17","modified_gmt":"2019-01-04T05:49:17","slug":"introduction","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/mus235-05\/","title":{"rendered":"Introduction"},"content":{"rendered":"

In September of 2013, Josh Eells of Rolling Stone write an article, innocuously titled, \u201cMiley Cyrus on Why She Loves Weed, Went Wild at the VMAs and Much More<\/a>.\u201d The article tripped into a world reeling from some level of confusion at a \u201cNew Miley,\u201d but enamored by her hit song Wrecking Ball, released on August 25. In the article, Cyrus describes herself as performing \u201ca creepy, sexy baby\u201d for the VMAs, delivers some hot takes on racism in the music industry, and then veers aside to pay tribute to Sin\u00e9ad O\u2019Connor\u2019s music video for Nothing Compares 2 U (Eells, 2013<\/a>).<\/p>\n

It\u2019s like the Sinead O\u2019Connor video\u00a0[for \u201cNothing Compares 2 U\u201d], but, like, the most modern version. I\u00a0wanted it to be tough but really pretty \u2013 that\u2019s what Sinead did with\u00a0her hair and everything. The trick is getting the camera up above you,\u00a0so it almost looks like you\u2019re looking up at someone and crying\u2026 I think it will be one of those iconic videos, too. I think it\u2019s\u00a0something that people are not gonna forget. (Eells, 2013<\/a>)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The comparison between the two videos may not have been completely obvious until that moment. An initial watch of Wrecking Ball was more a moment of presque vu, lacking in extremely explicit calls to remember Sin\u00e9ad O\u2019Connor upon the sight of Cyrus hanging from a wrecking ball. When connected, however, it is apparent just how much Cyrus borrowed, or in her words modernized, from O\u2019Connor\u2019s 1990 hit song. Sin\u00e9ad O’Connor and Miley Cyrus employ similar bel canto<\/em> techniques, physical presentations, and minimalistic aesthetic expression to arrive at different spaces on opposite ends of the feminist spectrum.<\/p>\n

The comments Cyrus made were initially quite flattering to O’Connor, who would respond with tepid thanks, immediately followed by a forceful (and now deleted) condemnation of the young artist’s behavior.<\/p>\n

The message you keep sending is that it\u2019s somehow cool to be prostituted . . . it\u2019s so not cool Miley . . . it\u2019s dangerous. (Blistein, 2013<\/a>)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

A full-out online war began between the two, replete with ad hominem attacks and skeletons being ripped out of dusty Twitter accounts. There was bad blood everywhere, along with a stream of academic inquiry and comparisons of the two artists and songs. Whether or not she resented her impact on Cyrus, it was clear that O’Connor had left telling remarks on the music industry blueprint for wild child reinventions. Cyrus closely mirrored O’Connor’s early works in terms of her combative vocals, aesthetic minimalism, unpacking presentation through bodily exhibition and gaze, reworking of classic instrumentation, and driving home a message of authenticity.<\/p>\n

When it was all said and done, with Wrecking Ball retiring from constant airplay, and Nothing Compares 2 U sliding back into the shadows until Prince’s death, the two artists were in irreconcilable places.\u00a0O\u2019Connor and Cyrus are unique in that they are constantly on an open and forthright quest for personal truth. The two songs have come to represent eras in this search, yet the societal understanding of these two songs have held their images back until more recent creative interventions.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
Image from Entertainment Weekly online article<\/a>, published October 2, 2013.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In September of 2013, Josh Eells of Rolling Stone write an article, innocuously titled, \u201cMiley Cyrus on Why She Loves Weed, Went Wild at the…<\/p>\n

Continue readingIntroduction<\/span><\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":3322,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-38","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/mus235-05\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/38","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/mus235-05\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/mus235-05\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/mus235-05\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3322"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/mus235-05\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/mus235-05\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/38\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/mus235-05\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}