{"id":558,"date":"2021-09-06T11:55:04","date_gmt":"2021-09-06T15:55:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/mci-fall2021\/?page_id=558"},"modified":"2021-09-06T11:55:04","modified_gmt":"2021-09-06T15:55:04","slug":"rubrics","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/mci-fall2021\/assignments\/rubrics\/","title":{"rendered":"Rubrics"},"content":{"rendered":"

Keyword Response and Reply Comment Rubric<\/h2>\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\n\t\n\t
Criteria<\/th>Excellent<\/th>Good<\/th>Poor<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Response Post<\/strong><\/td>15 Points<\/strong>
\nFully addresses reading and illustrates keyword use in contemporary media or experience with example<\/td>		12 Points<\/strong>
\nMostly addresses reading, partially illustrates keyword use, or provides unclear example<\/td>		10 Points<\/strong>
\nMisses some aspect of the assignment, or submitted but incomplete<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Reply Comments<\/strong><\/td>10 Points<\/strong>
\nTwo meaningful contributions added<\/td>		7 Points<\/strong>
\nOne meaningful contribution added, or both contributions lack excellence<\/td>		5 Points<\/strong>
\nReply is unclear, unrelated to original post, or lack meaningful contribution to conversation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n

Response Paper Rubric<\/h2>\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t
Criteria<\/th>Excellent<\/th>Good<\/th>Average<\/th>Poor<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Identifies Keywords<\/td>25 Points<\/strong>
\nFully defines & explains keyword and reason for selection<\/td>		20 Points<\/strong>
\nMostly defines & explains keyword and reason for selection<\/td>		15 Points<\/strong>
\nAspects of definition or explanation missing<\/td>		10 Points<\/strong>
\nInadequate or incomplete definition or explanation of keyword<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Illustrates Keyword in Media<\/strong><\/td>50 Points<\/strong>
\nClearly documents how the keyword concepts are engaged through media<\/td>		40 Points<\/strong>
\nMostly documents how keyword concepts are engages<\/td>		30 Points<\/strong>
\nAspects of documentation are missing or unclear<\/td>		20 Points<\/strong>
\nInadequate documentation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Uses Keyword as Lens<\/strong><\/td>25 Points<\/strong>
\nClearly uses keyword as a critical lens to explain media<\/td>		20 Points<\/strong>
\nSomewhat clearly uses keywords as critical lenses<\/td>		15 Points<\/strong>
\nObscurely or inadequately uses keyword as critical lens<\/td>		10 Points<\/strong>
\nPoor, surface approach to critical lens<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Writes Clearly & Effectively<\/strong><\/td>25 Points<\/strong>
\nClear, concise prose is used throughout<\/td>		20 Points<\/strong>
\nSome minor errors in clarity, style, and structure<\/td>		15 Points<\/strong>
\nSome significant errors in parts of the paper<\/td>		10 Points<\/strong>
\nMany significant errors throughout<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n

Field Experience Report Rubric<\/h2>\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t
Criteria<\/th>Excellent<\/th>Good<\/th>Average<\/th>Poor<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Summary<\/td>15 Points<\/strong>
\nProvides a complete summary of performance in own words<\/td>		12 Points<\/strong>
\nGood summary of performance<\/td>		10 Points<\/strong>
\nSome details missing in summary<\/td>		8 Points<\/strong>
\nIncomplete, nonexistent summary OR summary far too long and detailed<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Keyword<\/td>15 Points<\/strong>
\nClearly identifies keyword concepts or ideas<\/td>		12 Points<\/strong>
\nMostly clearly identifies keyword concepts or ideas<\/td>		10 Points<\/strong>
\nCursory identification of keyword concepts\/ideas<\/td>		8 Points<\/strong>
\nMissing or unclear keyword identification<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Lens<\/td>30 Points<\/strong>
\nThoroughly illustrates how keyword concept or idea engaged<\/td>		25 Points<\/strong>
\nLargely illustrates how keyword concepts\/ideas are engaged<\/td>		20 Points<\/strong>
\nPartially illustrations how keyword concept or idea engaged<\/td>		15 Points<\/strong>
\nIncomplete or missing illustrations<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Clarity<\/td>15 Points<\/strong>
\nClear, concise, and grammatically correct<\/td>		12 Points<\/strong>
\nMinor lack of clarity<\/td>		10 Points<\/strong>
\nSome lack of clarity<\/td>		8 Points<\/strong>
\nUnclear or significant grammatical or mechanical errors<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n

ArcGIS StoryMap Rubric<\/h2>\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t
Criteria<\/th>
Excellent<\/span><\/div><\/th>
Good<\/span><\/div><\/th>
Average<\/span><\/div><\/th>
Poor<\/span><\/div><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Keyword<\/strong><\/td>
75 Points<\/strong><\/div>
\nIdentifies and fully builds out a storymap of the selected keyword<\/td>
60 Points<\/strong><\/div>
\nIdentifies but lacks complete build out of keyword storymap<\/td>
45 Points<\/strong><\/div>
\nLacks clarity in identifying and\/or building out storymap of the keyword<\/td>
30 Points<\/strong><\/div>
\nPoorly or incompletely connects to keyword concepts or ideas<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Accuracy<\/strong><\/td>
75 Points<\/strong><\/div>
\nAccurately depicts the storymap of the keyword without errors or misinterpretation<\/td>
60 Points<\/strong><\/div>
\nMinor errors in interpretation or errors in presentation of keyword<\/td>
45 Points<\/strong><\/div>
\nMore significant errors in presentation of keyword<\/td>
30 Points<\/strong><\/div>
\nMajor errors in presentation of keyword<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Creativity<\/strong><\/td>
25 Points<\/strong><\/div>
\nProvides depth and breadth of creativity, integrating multiple complete media types<\/td>
20 Points<\/strong><\/div>
\nRepresents a creative approach, but lacks some thoroughness, breadth, or depth of creative integration<\/td>
15 Points<\/strong><\/div>
\nLacks creativity or breadth and depth of integration of multiple media, but completes media integration<\/td>
10 Points<\/strong><\/div>
\nIncomplete media integration, incomplete depth or breadth; lacks creative approach<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
StoryMap Quality<\/strong><\/td>
25 Points<\/strong><\/div>
\nTakes full advantage of StoryMap medium, demonstrating technological and information literacy<\/td>
20 Points<\/strong><\/div>
\nMostly takes full advantage of StoryMap medium, although some issues may be present<\/td>
15 Points<\/strong><\/div>
\nIncompletely takes advantage of medium, demonstration a minor lack of literacy<\/td>
10 Points<\/strong><\/div>
\nDemonstrates little mastery or literacy<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":48,"featured_media":0,"parent":112,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"page-templates\/full-width.php","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-558","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/mci-fall2021\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/558","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/mci-fall2021\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/mci-fall2021\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/mci-fall2021\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/48"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/mci-fall2021\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=558"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/mci-fall2021\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/558\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":574,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/mci-fall2021\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/558\/revisions\/574"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/mci-fall2021\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/112"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/mci-fall2021\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=558"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}