Council Day Four Evaluation

The Council session went very smoothly in passing the creedal statement on the Holy Spirit. All members seemed receptive to changes in wording and alterations were made efficiently. The statement was neutral enough to be accepted by Alexandrians and Arians alike, as there is no specification of the Holy Spirit’s united relationship or oneness with the Father and Son. Hopefully the vagueness of this section of the creed is not only a result of the mystery of the Holy Spirit but also a renewed devotion to unity and effort to compromise.

The canon on Lapsed Christians was moving along efficiently but we hit a wall and started going a bit too deep into the topic. Rather than focusing on the language of a canonical statement, speakers argued on the logic and reason behind their beliefs without changing any minds. With the tie of votes on the statement, it was helpful to speak to council members individually and have them explain their stance without interference and in plain words what they believe the statement should say. Perhaps we can utilize this technique again in upcoming sessions. Hopefully now that we see what method of approaching canons is most useful, we will be able to be straightforward in our arguments and focus on clarity and simplicity instead of philosophy.

I am pleased with the canon on the lapsed Christians that emerged from this session. My goal was a canon that sanctioned the Lapsed in some way, and I think that the agreement to have them rebaptized accomplishes this. This method requires a proof of their devotion to the church but still welcomes them back. I think that this was a good compromise for both opinions, as it is not a punishment, per se, but is a “consequence” and will heighten the unity and devotion in the church by renewing the faith and ensuring dedication.

Also, regarding the canons:

We will need to work through the topics as quickly as possible. Therefore, it is imperative that all council members read the canonical statements posted on the blog before the session each day. That way, you each may be prepared with exactly what we are discussing and what you agree or disagree with. Then you may present alternate opinions during the session itself, and we will vote to find the majority consensus.