The final question Ruscio brings up is a concerning one: can \u201cour democracy survive a leader without humility?\u201d A great point Ruscio makes is that humility does not need to mean weakness, even though it sometimes inherently does. Strong leaders that are authoritative and visionary can also be humble in their ways. This humility comes from their character as Ruscio believes it is \u201cnot a skill acquired,\u201d but a true telling of their personal character (Ruscio, p. 2). I think as a society we look to the character of our potential political figures when we consider our vote. Most people are going to try to choose a leader that reflects their values while also reflecting the characteristics of a decent human being (i.e. kindness, respectfulness, etc.). After reading Ruscio\u2019s argument, I think humility is a characteristic that is unconsciously overlooked, yet very important in our democratic system.<\/p>\n
The idea of the \u201c\u2019pruning theory\u2019 of power\u201d is also an interesting concept in the face of our democratic system and current political climate. Ruscio describes the theory as political power growing after being cut back (p. 4). He uses the example of Washington leaving office after two terms. This example paired with the theory highlights an important point that in a democracy \u201cthe office is bigger than the person\u201d (Ruscio, p. 6). Throughout history, presidents have striven to make change for the greater good and to use their voice and authority to uphold the office because they understand this idea. They recognized the humility necessary to not let the title\/position of the president go straight to their head. I\u2019m not so sure our current president can say the same.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The final question Ruscio brings up is a concerning one: can \u201cour democracy survive a leader without humility?\u201d A great point Ruscio makes is that…<\/p>\n