Miller talks about two different inequalities right off the bat. I think this is a really unnoticed idea in todays society. With temporary inequality we look at it as generally a positive thing. For example, parents raising children and teaching them manners. Permanent inequality is based off uncontrollable characteristics such as race. However, many times society is so polarized I feel we can not make the distinction between temporary and permanent inequality.<\/p>\n
Finding that distinction is very crucial. For example, a teacher can be teaching a kid that he or she is already inferior. When the two inequalities intersect, I think it can lead into mass permanent inequality. These kinds of inequalities are hard to find as they are done in a covered up way. Distinguishing between healthy temporary leadership and unhealthy permanent leadership is important to stay clear of possible tyrannicide and dictatorship. These articles made me wonder if we have all been under permanent inequality, but we just do not know how?<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Miller talks about two different inequalities right off the bat. I think this is a really unnoticed idea in todays society. With temporary inequality we…<\/p>\n