In Miller’s reading, she described what domination and subornation were and how they are important. She talks about the “superior” party and a “lesser” party in a society. I found this section interesting because I never looked at it in the way Miller did. She uses parents and children as an example and I think she is correct. In the text, she says, “The ‘superior’ party presumably has more of some ability or valuable quality, which she\/he is supposed to impart to the ‘lesser’ person.” I do agree with her statement because when I look at it from the perspective of a parent and child this fits.<\/p>\n
Miller also says that we have not found a good way to carry out central tasks. The central task of movement from unequal to equal. She then goes on to say, “Officially, we say we want to do things, but we often fail.” I found this very interesting but correct. It is just like she said earlier, we have not found a way to carry out certain tasks and sometimes if we try, we fail.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
In Miller’s reading, she described what domination and subornation were and how they are important. She talks about the “superior” party and a “lesser” party…<\/p>\n