Jesus in History and Tradition
Show Navigation Hide Navigation
  • Home
  • Groups
    • Final Five (Group 1)
    • The Group Without A Name (Group 2)
    • Group 3
    • FaiThgirLz (Group 4)
  • Minute Papers
    • 8/30 Historiography I
    • 9/1 Historiography (II) and the Gospels
    • 9/6 Jesus in Mark
    • 9/8 Jesus in Matthew
    • 9/13 Jesus in Luke
    • 9/15 Jesus in John and Thomas
    • 9/20 Memories of Jesus in the Early Church
    • 9/22 Jesus according to Reimarus and Paulus
    • 9/27 Jesus according to Renan
    • 9/29 Jesus according to Jefferson
    • 10/4 No Quest (Schweitzer, Bultmann, Kähler)
    • 10/6 Jesus according to the National Socialist Party
    • 10/13 Godspell!
    • 10/18 New Quest (Käsemann and Robinson)
    • 10/20 Third Quest: Sanders and Vermes
    • 10/25 Third Quest: Crossan
    • 10/27 Third Quest: Allison
    • 11/1 Jesus of Montreal
    • 11/8 A Queer Portrait of Jesus (Moxnes)
    • 11/10 A Latino Portrait of Jesus (Elizondo)
    • 11/15 A Non-Western Portrait of Jesus (LeMarquand)
    • 11/17 Reprise (McKnight)
    • 11/29 Monty Python’s Life of Brian
    • 12/1 Regroup (Keith)
  • Blackboard

McKnight

Chloe Simpson November 17, 2016 11/17 Reprise (McKnight), Final Five (Group 1)

McKnight is very similar to the no quest scholars because he thinks it is methodologically possibly but theologically unnecessary (in his words useless) to define a historical Jesus.

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

© 2025 Jesus in History and Tradition