{"id":2472,"date":"2013-02-20T01:19:31","date_gmt":"2013-02-20T05:19:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/james\/?p=2472"},"modified":"2013-02-20T01:19:31","modified_gmt":"2013-02-20T05:19:31","slug":"2472","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/james\/2013\/02\/20\/2472\/","title":{"rendered":""},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This year I have been thinking a lot about the environment and the responsibilities we all have to protect and preserve it. Last year I was swept off my feet by a charismatic Green Peace representative, and for the first time I found myself actively working to spread awareness of environmental issues. Although I largely look back on this as a mildly embarrassing phase of my transition into adulthood, I cannot deny that my brief involvement in environmental activism was responsible for many of my most educational and rewarding experiences in college. In truth, sometimes I wonder why I became disenchanted to begin with and certainly why I feel so silly about it in retrospect. I guess people generally look at Green Peace (as well as many other radical NPOs) and see crazy progressives preying on student\u2019s na\u00efve idealism. A lot of people look at it and see largely uneducated kids marching around the streets being obnoxious to much more realistic adults who scoff and say, \u201cWhen you\u2019re older you\u2019ll see how the real world works\u201d. As I mentioned in last week\u2019s post, there is certainly some truth to this. A lot of times I felt like I was organizing and planning for the sake of being busy, then doing pointless protests so that we could take pictures to put on Facebook. It\u2019s not I gave up on environmentalism altogether, or that I see the fight as useless\u2026 I just wasn\u2019t sure that I was going about it in the right way. In fact, the main reason I\u2019ve drifted is because I decided it was only worth it if I decided to dedicate my career to it \u2013 which I was not. I felt like I would never make an impact worth the effort unless I made it a full time occupation.<\/p>\n<p>While rereading these blog posts, I\u2019ve realized that environmentalism isn\u2019t something one can really give up once they\u2019ve become privy to it. I\u2019ve realized that environmentalism is largely a state of mind, a perspective and a lifestyle. Of course, this is definitely different than being an activist, but this simple realization has suddenly made environmental activism feel a lot more accessible to me. Last week <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/james\/2013\/02\/10\/a-little-goes-a-long-way-volunteering-4\/\">Meeps<\/a> talks about the film <em>Chasing Ice<\/em>, and how James Balog wanted to <em>show<\/em> climate change to his viewers. Anytime anyone mentions the EFF, that film comes up; everyone who saw it loved it and everyone who missed it is regretful. I think environmentalism, in particular climate change, is often an incredibly abstract concept to people. It was exactly this abstraction that left me feeling disconnected from what I was trying to do with Green Peace. That\u2019s why the film works so well. It isn\u2019t trying to convince people through statistics, because to a certain extent almost anyone who reads them doesn\u2019t really understand them. Instead he\u2019s just showing footage of the actual effects \u2013 He\u2019s trying to show people something that\u2019s otherwise\u00a0inaccessible, give people a connection to something that he thinks is in need of attention.<\/p>\n<p>In this week\u2019s post, <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/james\/2013\/02\/19\/rediscovering-richmond\/\">Anne <\/a>talks about how this class has made her more inquisitive and attentive to her everyday ecological systems. I would most certainly agree, and I\u2019m beginning to think that this attentiveness is the most important thing we can foster as environmentalists. What I found the most frustrating about Green Peace is that so often we were met with people who simply didn\u2019t care. People found our activism to be crazy, they found us to be hippies. I wasn\u2019t frustrated by the insults, I was frustrated because I honestly couldn\u2019t understand why everyone else <em>didn\u2019t<\/em> care. I now realize that no amount of protesting would get these people to care. They don\u2019t care because they don\u2019t understand; they simply haven\u2019t been exposed to nature in the same way that\u00a0I\u2019ve been privileged to. In our first open topic post, a lot of us wrote about our bodies of water at home. While writing about his creek, <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/james\/2013\/02\/03\/having-fun\/\">Bestie <\/a>wrote the simplest thing that stuck out to me. He ended with a resolute acknowledgement: \u201c[Eighteen Mile Creek] has been a big part of my life\u201d. I think that\u2019s ultimately something that brings a lot of us Earth Lodgers together; we have grown up around nature, nature is part of who we are, and at the end of the day we will probably never stop caring for it.<\/p>\n<p>I then have to ask myself, is caring enough? Is having this relationship changing anything? Of course the answer to both of these questions is yes. How can anyone be expected to take care of the environment if they don\u2019t understand it? The other day Carey Jamieson from the school of continuing studies came to our GreenUR meeting. We were talking about Nature Deficit Disorder and she told us a story about watching a kid cry because he was scared of a sparrow. Spending her entire life on a farm, she was flabbergasted that a child didn\u2019t understand that sparrows are harmless. Can we blame the child? Of course not; just as we can\u2019t really blame people for not caring more. They just need to be shown why it\u2019s important. Like how <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/james\/2013\/02\/10\/light-pollution\/\">Bleach <\/a>explains his first conceptualization of light pollution. He was only concerned about the detrimental effects of civilization because he was privileged to live in a place left largely unaffected. It was his relationship and love for Maine\u2019s unadulterated starscape that made him recognize the importance of environmental attentiveness. I mean, can we really expect people to care that the birds don\u2019t chirp anymore when they never heard them to begin with?<\/p>\n<p>I guess this brings me back to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.williamcronon.net\/writing\/Trouble_with_Wilderness_Main.html\">William Cronon\u2019s article <\/a>that we read a few weeks ago. The duality we create between man and nature really is problematic. Nature is everywhere just as the effects of man are everywhere. We\u2019re so intertwined that we can no longer think of the two as separate. In George\u2019s post <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/james\/2013\/02\/10\/rivers-and-roads\/\">\u201cRivers and Roads\u201d, <\/a>he talks about this new landscape we\u2019ve created. But I think it\u2019s easy to be much more attentive to manmade structures than to nature. We experience objects through their utility, and it\u2019s easy to take the little brook running by the road for granted. We\u2019re only willing to notice when it\u2019s our backyard or a sublime view of Zion Canyon; we forget that our happiness is much more reliant on the chorus of birds in the morning, the frogs at night, the stars, the feel of moss under our feet\u00a0\u2013 then it is on things that we are so much more vocal about, like broken doorknobs or potholes.<\/p>\n<p>So where do I go from here? I\u2019m making it a goal to continue to be more and more attentive to the world around me. <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/james\/2013\/02\/10\/first-experience-with-wbch\/\">Taylor <\/a>talks about working at the William Byrd Community House\u2019s farmlet, and I was really inspired. He writes of being surprised how unintuitive a lot of his work was; like pruning plants by almost half in order to urge them to grow more, or mixing poor soil in with the compost to avoid creating an impenetrable bubble for the plant. I want to involve myself with nature in a hands on way, so that I can actually understand how it work. I think this new level of attentiveness would help me better comprehend the natural world around me, better recognize when it is healthy and when things are afoul. It&#8217;s like when people ask me if I care whether other people eat meat. It\u2019s not that I think everyone should be vegetarian, I just think everyone should understand where their meat is coming from, and then decide whether they\u2019re comfortable supporting that.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s not that I think everyone should dedicate their life to environmentalism, I mean <em>I\u2019m not<\/em>. I just think everyone should try to at least recognize\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0try to see for themselves &#8211; that we are part of a system that all have a stake in. And for me, opening opportunities for people to forge such relationships is probably more rewarding than any other sort of advocacy I can think of. As <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/james\/2013\/02\/03\/beware-vs-be-aware\/\">Jenni <\/a>wrote two weeks ago, Earth Lodge has the potential to help demystify the natural world for our community as a whole.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This year I have been thinking a lot about the environment and the responsibilities we all have to protect and preserve it. Last year I was swept off my feet by a charismatic Green Peace representative, and for the first &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/james\/2013\/02\/20\/2472\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1881,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6248],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2472","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-synthesis"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/james\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2472","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/james\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/james\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/james\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1881"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/james\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2472"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/james\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2472\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/james\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2472"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/james\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2472"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/james\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2472"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}