Education and Democracy
In the United States, a child’s zip code can determine their professional future. Educational inequality is vast, with white students surpassing their racial minority peers in the classroom. While the government is aware of the education gap and organizations continue to take action in order to shrink it, its existence is a threat to America’s children and, relevant to our discussion, popular sovereignty.
Popular sovereignty is one of the three requirements of a democracy. In Chapter 1, Greenberg and Page outline seven important factors in which popular sovereignty may manifest. One important requirement of popular sovereignty is “high-quality information is available.” The voter must:
“have access to accurate political information, insightful interpretations, and vigorous debate” (Greenberg, 9).
The chapter provides examples of avenues through which citizens may acquire such information, such as government officials and the media. However, it completely leaves out the need for equal opportunity and quality education in order to make political decisions with high-quality information.
If students are unable to learn because their school’s funding cannot provide an adequate amount of textbooks, enough teachers, or even sanitary conditions, how can our democracy expect them to acquire the skills to absorb and synthesize high-quality political information? Can we really say that the United States is a nation of popular sovereignty if students in impoverished communities receive a lesser civics education than students from affluent neighborhoods?
In September of 2016, only 12 out of 44 Richmond City schools received accreditation, meaning that their academic performance is well below par. Richmond, a city with a long and continuing history of racial segregation, is hugely contributing to the education gap. Its racial minorities largely continue to receive education that year after year fails to receive government approval.
Yet, we continue to call ourselves a democracy. While access to high quality information is only one of seven components necessary to fulfill one of three requirements for democracy, a look into its efficacy reveals a difficult question. Do we really elect the “right” representative for our interests if we do not all have the education necessary to make the “right” decisions?
In our political climate, propaganda and a candidate’s personality can easily overshadow the real issues. I believe that our president, who is objectively under-qualified for the position, won the election in large part because of his charisma. He didn’t need to talk about the real issues in depth because he was, in part, targeting an audience without technical political knowledge. I wonder what the outcome of the election would have been if all American voters shared the same high-quality access to education.
I believe that the United States cannot provide all voters with high-quality information because it does not provide all students with high-quality public education. I won’t venture to say that this disqualifies the United States as a democracy, only that we cannot be truly democratic if we do not actively pursue educational equality.