{"id":175,"date":"2018-10-19T16:13:26","date_gmt":"2018-10-19T20:13:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/greatwarssir\/?p=175"},"modified":"2018-10-19T16:13:26","modified_gmt":"2018-10-19T20:13:26","slug":"universal-obligatory-military-training-and-service","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/greatwarssir\/2018\/10\/19\/universal-obligatory-military-training-and-service\/","title":{"rendered":"Universal Obligatory Military Training and Service"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-177 aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/greatwarssir\/files\/2018\/10\/IMG_20181010_143306-225x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"225\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/greatwarssir\/files\/2018\/10\/IMG_20181010_143306-225x300.jpg 225w, https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/greatwarssir\/files\/2018\/10\/IMG_20181010_143306-768x1024.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 225px) 100vw, 225px\" \/><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">At first glance, a National Security League pamphlet on \u201cUniversal Obligatory Military Training and Service\u201d seemed too \u2018on brand\u2019 to be interesting. Without even opening the cover I was sure of the words I would inevitably find inside: \u201cpatriotic duty,\u201d \u201ccitizenship,\u201d and \u201cdefense of democracy.\u201d \u00a0What ideas and phrases could it contain that would alter my conception of the NSL beyond its two paragraph wikipedia introduction? Regardless, I opened the cover. Instead, I found a fascinatingly written pamphlet that is formatted unlike any other I looked at. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Written by George R. Conroy in 1917, this pamphlet sought to \u201cmake as clear as possible the meaning of universal obligatory military training and service\u201d and advocate for its implementation as a formal United States policy. As I mentioned previously, it is not the subject manner that makes this pamphlet notable, but the manner in which its argument is presented. From what I gathered, these pamphlets were typically written similarly to essays: the author provides a thesis and then substantiates their claim in subsequent paragraphs. Not this one. Conroy &amp; Co. at the National Security League opted to write the entirety of this pamphlet in a question and answer format. Unlike a typical Q&amp;A where perhaps an interviewer asks a series of questions to someone, or an FAQ that compiles questions commonly asked with their appropriate answers, this pamphlet was written entirely by Conroy. That is to say, one man wrote both the questions <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">and <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">answers. Insignificant though this may seem, it is in fact a proven rhetorical trick that allowed the National Security League to craft leading questions such as: <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u201cQ. <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Would it have any other result in this country than to build up a great citizen soldiery and guarantee our security against foreign aggression?<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">A. Yes.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">And:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u201cQ.<\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> It is not actual service, then, but the training he receives before he reaches his twentieth year that makes the Swiss the soldier par excellence that he is?<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">A. Exactly.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">And my personal favorite:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u201cQ. <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Why do the professional pacifists try to mislead the public on this question?\u201d<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">By structuring his pamphlet in this manner, George R. Conroy constructs a faux-discussion between the National Security League and the readership. In doing so, he effectively \u2018changes the rules\u2019 of debate. Rather than presenting an argument and support, Conroy presents a series of questions and optimal, prepared responses. Additionally, the brevity of the format makes it inherently more easily digestible. Rather than having to trace an author\u2019s argument through a essay, one is plainly presented with \u2018what you should be wondering\u2019 and \u2018what is actually true.\u2019 Resultantly, the reader subconsciously identifies with the Question-er, uneducated on this subject and seeking information that is most easily provided by the immediate answers. Even I found myself susceptible to this trick; at one point I realized I was literally shaking my head while reading the seemingly naive questions and then nodding my head as I read the \u2018absolute\u2019 answers. Both the questions and answers, mind you, were written by Conroy. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Conroy and the National Security League used this Q&amp;A format to great effect for the entirety of the pamphlet, pointing the Australia and Switzerland as prime historical implementers of universal obligatory military training. This pamphlet provides valuable insight into the argumentative forms through which the National Security League advanced their nationalistic agenda. <\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>At first glance, a National Security League pamphlet on \u201cUniversal Obligatory Military Training and Service\u201d seemed too \u2018on brand\u2019 to be interesting. Without even opening the cover I was sure of the words I would inevitably find inside: \u201cpatriotic duty,\u201d &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/greatwarssir\/2018\/10\/19\/universal-obligatory-military-training-and-service\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3434,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-175","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/greatwarssir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/175","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/greatwarssir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/greatwarssir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/greatwarssir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3434"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/greatwarssir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=175"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/greatwarssir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/175\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/greatwarssir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=175"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/greatwarssir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=175"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/greatwarssir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=175"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}