Tonight we dove deeper into using primary sources. I felt like I was back in high school again reading and analyzing sources! However, I got to practice the extra step of not only extracting information from a source but really decifering the underlying messages in text. This activity was slightly difficult for me, as well as others I noticed, because I am used to just taking the top, superficial layer of text, what exactly is written on the page, as the truth. It was hard to think in a more theoretical way and try to infer reasons not blatantly stated for why the Mongomery Bus Boycott was successful. In my mind, history has always been based on facts, less scientific hypothesizing and more mathematical – a clear path or answer. Through all the MBB discussion, I felt I gained useful insight into teaching the use of primary sources.
I enjoyed the reading groups much more than I anticipated. The book my group is reading, Blood on the River, takes place during one of my favorite times in history. I like discussing the reading with my group members and reflecting on what we thought was interesting or important. The various roles we all played, I was the setting and summary specialist this week, really gave us a chance to talk about different aspects of the story. I can see how these reading group roles can truly be beneficial to students.