While I was reading the material for this class, I kept wondering how substituting a textbook with other reading materials could make socials studies come alive. Reading a handout is just as lackluster as reading the textbook. The class really helped me to understand the point of these particular handouts. The activity about the Montgomery Bus Boycott was something I have never done before. It was interesting how my group was able to describe the event by understanding the terms, without really remembering what the event was. The handouts were not what I had expected. Reading handouts of the primary sources were so much more intriguing. The step-by-step pace of the activity was helpful. Had I been given all there resources at once, I probably would have been overwhelmed. Analyzing them one at a time assisted me with focusing on the main point of each article. I know what the Boycott is now. This method is something that I definitely need to remember when I am teaching.
When Dr. Storh discussed the information on Rosa Parks that we might have learned from our textbooks versus the reals accounts of the event, my mind was blown. I was left wondering what else I have read in my history books that was not factual. I have also often wondered how the WW II perspective in a US History textbook would differ from that in a German History textbook. At this point, I can only assume they have conflicting accounts.
I am really enjoying the literature circle. I can’t help but think that I am missing the facts by not memorizing a list of details. It was interesting to see what others in my group noticed that I didn’t. We need more time to discuss. 🙂
Literature circles will be an important part of my social studies teaching in the future. I would also like to try the photography activity where the students compare their photos to pictures of children their age in the time period being studied. I think that can make the differences of that time more impactful. The battle plan is an excellent idea. What a way to bring a battle to life! It involves strategical thinking that would be hard to incorporate in other areas.
Hello Jennifer,
I loved your comment: “When Dr. Stohr discussed the information on Rosa Parks that we might have learned from our textbooks versus the real accounts of the event, my mind was blown. I was left wondering what else I have read in my history books that was not factual.” This is precisely how we hoped you would feel! Making a simple shift in reading materials when teaching about an historical event can open up a whole new world. I also liked knowing that you had a better experience because we looked at one resource at a time. I was very strategic in setting the lesson up this way for the exact reason you noted. I knew my audience and I knew if I wanted to make the impact I hoped to make it was important to scaffold the lesson in steps.
I appreciate your thoughtful reflection and truly hope the impact of this lesson is something you will remember when you receive the gift of your own classroom one day.
Lynne