The Next Frontier, a New Assignment

Day 5 and soon we share work with our colleagues, a humbling experience indeed. I’m still abuzz with all the technology crammed into a few days of learning and amazed that we all generated two products in so little time. I can’t say my projects are ready for prime time – I typically need time away from a project and return with fresh eyes – but the learning process was well worth it.

I was struck by a common reaction by myself and my colleagues when we saw the image of ourselves on screen or heard the sound of our voice. We flinched. I wanted to escape to another room, maybe doing something more appealing. Maybe read tax forms. Anything but see and hear myself. But herein lies its usefulness for dance classes.

There’s typically a gap between how students believe themselves to be moving and how one is actually moving. As in writing, there’s a gap between what writers believes is communicated and the actuality of the words. In dance, students often use a mirror, which cranes the head and distorts the movement, or they rely on another’s feedback. In using digital media,students can tape themselves moving and reflect on the discrepancy. They can explore a movement in isolation or an entire sequence. Dance is transient. An assignment capturing a transient moment for extended investigation and reflection could be beneficial.

My concern is still the time required by a digital project. It’s challenging enough to get students, especially those not majoring in dance, to get their bodies moving. How could I organize an assignment to keep focus on embodiment, their fleshy self, not a virtual one? Were this purely a writing class, the pathway between digital versus paper seems clear. My reflections on coming up with a suitable assignment with reasonable expectations continue.

Final thoughts

Thanks again to Ken and Hil for a wonderful, engaging, and fun week. I learned so much!

I second Nicole’s sentiment that “practice makes product”. I definitely view my digital narrative and interview as “practice” or “experiments,” which makes me question the polished final products I expect of my students on alternative projects. Perhaps simply changing the assignment language would free them to play a bit more and work more diligently on the process rather than a perfect final product. Not that a tight final product isn’t important, but sometimes the end product (i.e. the grade) tends to overshadow the actual point of the assignment. Thanks for reminding me about how the process works from the student perspective!

Process and Product

Like others, I was fascinated by iMovie and all it can do. I love details and the ability to play with different parts. That certainly got me into a bit of trouble, as I don’t think I knew exactly what I was taking on, but I had a ton of fun. That said, working on the video today gave me a whole new appreciation for production. I knew it takes time. How much time I underestimated. I got caught up with the cool “tricks” I could do and then realized that something I had just worked an hour or so on was only about 20 seconds worth of video, and I had a lot more to go. It’s extremely gratifying when it comes together, but frustrating when you realize the ratio of process to product. That sounds negative, but as I’ve been thinking about it, it’s not so different from working on a paper. I just have better writing skills since I practice those more. I guess my takeaway: practice makes product.

I saw a lot of my students in myself today, so again a humbling experience.

In terms of teaching, my digital story was actually a trial run for an assignment I was thinking about giving my classes in the fall. Having completed it myself now, I’m not sure using the digital story for this particular assignment is best, as it posed some visual challenges I hadn’t quite thought through. I am still thinking about this type of assignment for the intro course, as the questions I struggled with today (audience, soundtrack, misc. sounds, visual, etc) are a great starting point.

Finally, Ken & Hil – thank you for all your help. This has been a fantastic experience!

 

 

 

The Audacity of Digital Media Production

I found the exercise of working with sound files, still images and text to be extremely engaging and now can see how these multiple dimensions enrich the creative experience. I admit that I also enjoyed the challenge of precision in the process: finding the right image at an appropriate resolution, harmonizing the tones of voice, soundtrack (!) and content, finessing the placement and duration of visual elements, all while just touching the surface of what iMovie and Audacity are capable of. This has been a wonderful opportunity to explore new methods of conveying ideas in aesthetically interesting and animating ways, and I’m audaciously hoping to develop inspiring ideas for how to integrate this new knowledge into my teaching in the future.

A big shout out of appreciation to Ken and Hil for organizing this session and running it so effectively!

A Student Again

Creating a digital story was just like being a student again — with all the possibilities and pitfalls that entails.

  • I was learning how to use new technology, find material to use, and create something worthwhile all at the same time.  I felt the stress of having to create something interesting and meaningful under pressure — and yet making the final product like it was effortless and could be no other way.  I sometimes forget when I am teaching students how to analyze policies, how to use SPSS, and how to write up their arguments that all of this can be very new and foreign to them.  I forget that fluency with any media or language is built over time and with experience.
  • Last night I was up at midnight, having written ten different drafts of the script and recorded the audio at least seven times (only to wake up inspired, change the script, and re-record this morning).  My husband came downstairs, laughed at me, and said, “This isn’t even for a grade!”  I realize how much I want something to look perfect (or as close to) when it is public.  I remember too why students sometimes take their grades personally — There is something of ourselves in any creative endeavor.
  • I forgot to do my “homework”!  That’s right.  I forgot to post my daily reflection yesterday because I was in such angst about the DST.  And I’m only taking one “course”!  (To make up, Profs. Warren and Scott, this post is longer than typically the case.)

On the other hand, I really enjoyed the creative freedom of the digital story.  As a “scientist,” I am used to be detached and analytical, even when my papers have “my take” in them.  I found it really hard to write the DST script this way.  However, once I was able to “find my voice” and write “from the heart,” I found the process a lot easier, but it was like I had to think and speak in a different way.  I also realized that I could create a two-level story, one told in the spoken narrative and one conveyed through the visual images.  I could be ironic.  I could leave a lot unsaid — and in fact, the story could be more effective that way.

When I was done, I had a great feeling of satisfaction in getting to flex creative muscles that I don’t normally use and to bring forth something so closely tied to me — as a person instead of me the political scientist.

I am still not sure how I will use digital stories for my courses.  I’ll have to think about that some more.  I ask students to use quantitative and qualitative data to analyze social and economic phenomena.  I don’t know that digital stories would be effective for this.  But I also want (and it is often more a wish than an outcome) students to write with an awareness of the human beings behind the data.  I could see digital stories being a powerful medium for building that awareness.