{"id":6920,"date":"2021-03-29T10:35:15","date_gmt":"2021-03-29T14:35:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/criticalthinking\/?p=6920"},"modified":"2021-03-29T10:35:15","modified_gmt":"2021-03-29T14:35:15","slug":"blog-6-systems","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/criticalthinking\/2021\/03\/29\/blog-6-systems\/","title":{"rendered":"Blog 6 Systems"},"content":{"rendered":"

From the reading and podcast this week, it was interesting to pinpoint the human tendencies that explain why we always seem to be making mistakes. Dorner suggests that it is innate within us that we cannot see one problem on a larger scale than our immediate situation. He says some analysts \u201csee our tendency to think in simple chains of cause and effect as genetically preprogrammed and locate our inability to solve our problems in this genetic programming\u201d (6). So, it\u2019s genetic that we suck at making decisions sometimes\u2026 Whether that really is true or not, humans do still act in a set of patterns that Dorner and Bezio explore that are undeniable. In Dorner\u2019s evaluation of the game stimulations some key patterns stuck out to me. It is interesting to note that good participants made <\/span>more <\/span><\/i>decisions than bad participants. That seems so simple to me, more decisions, more action, more good obviously. But it also speaks to good participants wanting to ask more questions and see more possibilities in front of them. Dorner suggests that good participants cared about the \u201cwhy\u201d not just the \u201cwhat\u201d. Bad participants focusing on the \u201cwhat\u201d did not dive deep enough into the problems they faced.<\/span><\/p>\n

Bezio lays out a handful of things that help a system function best, and asking only \u201cwhat\u201d is not one of them. She tells us that systems function best when humans try not to oversimplify things. When a bad participant only asks \u201cwhat\u201d questions, they are seeking to simplify the task at hand and face it only at that level in front of them. That is when a system\u2019s extreme complexity is fatally overlooked. Moreover, she tells us that systems function best when humans do not rely on their instincts, biases, or traditions. As good participants asked \u201cwhy\u201d questions, I think that exemplifies them going beyond their gut reaction in order to understand the new situation in front of them, rather than make assumptions based on surface level information. An over-reliance on tradition and biases is at the forefront of societal issues at the moment. From climate change, to polarized politics, to wearing masks, to racial inequality, humans right now are relying on biases and traditions that formed in an entirely different society with entirely different norms and practices. When humans continue to only rely on their previous knowledge with an unwillingness to change, the traditions and biases we hold onto become so outdated that they become useless even without us realizing. Systems thrive on smaller decisions that build upon each other. The best way to fix our biases is small, repeated exposure over time that allows us to see a different perspective. Humans tend to always think big, but clearly it\u2019s time to change that instinct and think a lot smaller.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

From the reading and podcast this week, it was interesting to pinpoint the human tendencies that explain why we always seem to be making mistakes. Dorner suggests that it is innate within us that we cannot see one problem on a larger scale than our immediate situation. He says some analysts \u201csee our tendency to […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4546,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[41194],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6920","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-reading-responses"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/criticalthinking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6920","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/criticalthinking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/criticalthinking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/criticalthinking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4546"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/criticalthinking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6920"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/criticalthinking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6920\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6921,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/criticalthinking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6920\/revisions\/6921"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/criticalthinking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6920"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/criticalthinking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6920"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/criticalthinking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6920"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}