{"id":215,"date":"2015-11-07T20:30:54","date_gmt":"2015-11-07T20:30:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/cognitiveneurof\/?p=215"},"modified":"2015-11-24T15:51:46","modified_gmt":"2015-11-24T15:51:46","slug":"what-makes-a-language-hard-to-learn","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/cognitiveneurof\/2015\/11\/07\/what-makes-a-language-hard-to-learn\/","title":{"rendered":"What Makes A Language Hard to Learn?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"line-height: 1.5;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/cognitiveneurof\/files\/2015\/11\/hardest-languages-to-learn.jpg\"><br \/>\n<\/a>Learning a new language is difficult and requires a lot of time. Some people say that some languages are harder to learn than others while other people argue that there is no such thing as a \u201chardest language\u201d. Benny the Irish Polyglot writes that \u201cthe term \u2018hardest language\u2019 exists for no reason other than discouragement\u2019. A quick search online provided me with a detailed list of which languages are the hardest to learn. But what characteristics does a \u201chard language\u201d have? What makes a language easy to learn?<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>I believe the answer lies in language opaqueness.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"  wp-image-219 alignleft\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/cognitiveneurof\/files\/2015\/11\/talking-people-300x167.jpg\" alt=\"talking people\" width=\"280\" height=\"156\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/cognitiveneurof\/files\/2015\/11\/talking-people-300x167.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/cognitiveneurof\/files\/2015\/11\/talking-people.jpg 700w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 280px) 100vw, 280px\" \/>First, we need to get some basic terms down. Grapheme is a letter that represents the spoken sound, or a phoneme. Language opaqueness refers to how similar a grapheme is to the corresponding phoneme. For example, in English almost every letter has several different sounds; the &#8216;a&#8217; in cat does not sound the same as the &#8216;a&#8217; in wall. English would be considered an opaque language. An example of a transparent language, or a language where the grapheme corresponds to the phoneme, would be Italian. Grapheme-phoneme conversion is the process by which a grapheme is converted in a phoneme. So, basically, taking a written word and making it into a spoken word.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>So what does language opaqueness have to do with anything?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Several people have done studies on the relationship between language opaqueness and ho<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"  wp-image-217 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/cognitiveneurof\/files\/2015\/11\/country-tree-271x300.jpg\" alt=\"country tree\" width=\"227\" height=\"251\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/cognitiveneurof\/files\/2015\/11\/country-tree-271x300.jpg 271w, https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/cognitiveneurof\/files\/2015\/11\/country-tree.jpg 278w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 227px) 100vw, 227px\" \/>w quickly children learn to read (Ziegler et al 2010, Wimmer et al 1994). If a written language is highly transparent then the phonetic pattern should be easier to detect and, thus, the language is easy to learn (Warner et al 1994). Phonological awareness is most important in less transparent languages because of the variation in pronunciation of letters (Ziegler et al 2010). So, as you\u2019d expect, the more transparent the language is, the easier it was for the children to learn to read. Indeed, in a study conducted by Paulesu (2000), Italian student showed faster word and nonword reading than English students. Paulesu (2000) also found that for Italian students the left superior temporal regions associated with phoneme processing were activated while in English readers the left posterior inferior temporal gyrus, associated with word retrieval, was activated. Transparent languages are able to rely on how a a letter sounds, while in opaque languages using memorization is more common.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>But, wait, there\u2019s more. . .<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>There are several other factors that go into making a language hard or easy to learn. One determining aspect is what your mother tongue is. For example, a native English speaker will have an easier time picking up Spanish than a native Arabic speaker because of the similar alphabet, or orthography.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" size-medium wp-image-218 alignleft\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/cognitiveneurof\/files\/2015\/11\/languages.jpeg\" alt=\"languages\" width=\"259\" height=\"194\" \/>However, just because a language is hard to read does not necessary imply it will be hard to speak. Take Mandarin Chinese for example. While the written language is immensely complicated, the spoken language only involves four tones and the grammar is relatively simple. In comparison, Spanish, which is considered an easy written language to pick up, is more difficult to speak because of the various verb tenses.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>So can you rank a language?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In order to rank languages, one has to look at the opaqueness, among other factors. The \u201ceasiest\u201d language, while generally subjective, can be objectively measured. So what makes a language \u201chard\u201d? The phonics of the language has a very important role in making this distinction but it is also important to remember there are several other factors that make a language difficult to learn.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><em>References<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Lewis, B. (2010, August 17). What&#8217;s the hardest language to learn in the world? &#8211; Fluent in 3 months &#8211; Language Hacking and Travel Tips. Retrieved from http:\/\/www.fluentin3months.com\/most-difficult-language\/<\/p>\n<p>Paulesu, E., McCrory, E., Fazio, F., Menoncello, L., Brunswick, N., Cappa, S., . . . Frith, U. (2000). Cultural effect of brain function. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 91-96. doi:10.1038\/71163<\/p>\n<p>Simon, G., Bernard, C., Lalonde, R., &amp; Reba\u00ef, M. (2006). Orthographic transparency and grapheme\u2013phoneme conversion: An ERP study in Arabic and French readers. Brain Research, 1104(1), 141-152. doi:10.1016\/j.brainres.2006.05.071<\/p>\n<p>What are the hardest languages to learn? &#8211; Lingholic. (2014, May 19). Retrieved from http:\/\/www.lingholic.com\/hardest-languages-learn\/<\/p>\n<p>Wimmer, H., &amp; Goswami, U. (1994). The influence of orthographic consistency on reading development: Word recognition in English and German children. Cognition, 51(1), 91-103. doi:10.1016\/0010-0277(94)90010-8<\/p>\n<p>Ziegler, J., Bertrand, D., T\u00f3th, D., Cs\u00e9pe, V., Reis, A., Saine, N., . . . Fa\u00edsca, L. (2010). Orthographic Depth and Its Impact on Universal Predictors of Reading: A Cross-Language Investigation. Psychological Science, 1-9. doi:10.1177\/0956797610363406<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Learning a new language is difficult and requires a lot of time. Some people say that some languages are harder to learn than others while other people argue that there is no such thing as a \u201chardest language\u201d. Benny&#8230;<\/p>\n<div class=\"more-link-wrapper\"><a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/cognitiveneurof\/2015\/11\/07\/what-makes-a-language-hard-to-learn\/\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">What Makes A Language Hard to Learn?<\/span><\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":2298,"featured_media":223,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[31182],"class_list":["post-215","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-cn-style","entry"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/cognitiveneurof\/files\/2015\/11\/hardest-languages-to-learn.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/cognitiveneurof\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/cognitiveneurof\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/cognitiveneurof\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/cognitiveneurof\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2298"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/cognitiveneurof\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=215"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/cognitiveneurof\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/cognitiveneurof\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/223"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/cognitiveneurof\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=215"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/cognitiveneurof\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=215"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.richmond.edu\/cognitiveneurof\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=215"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}