Fonts That Help You Read: Fact or Fiction?

Dyslexi

Could something as simple as a font change help people read?

 

Around 10% of the world’s people have dyslexia, a developmental reading disorder that impairs a person’s ability to read and write. There is evidence that the font of the text has a significant effect on a text’s accessibility for people with dyslexia (Rello, L., & Baeza-Yates, R., 2013). The search for a way to make reading easier for dyslectics lead to the creation of a new type font: Dyslexie. The font Dyslexie was developed especially for dyslectics so that the differences between each character is bigger, easier to recognize, and less likely to be confused with another (Shallow, 2014).

 

 

How it works

The Dyslexie font comes with some interesting modifications to letters.

Fat BottomLetters now have what is called a heavy bottom. Dyslexie acknowledges that letters can be viewed as 3D objects. If letters are 3D objects, then gravity applies. Dyslexie “weighs down” the bottom of each letter by making the bottom section bolder, preventing it from tipping upside down.

Slanted PartsThere are also new slanted parts to the letters. This means that characters which look quite similar have been adapted by changing the tails, to reduce the similarity and avoid the problem of mirror letters.

 

Bigger OpeningsOpenings in letters that have them are bigger. Supposedly, these airier letters are more distinctive, so it is easier to see them as unique.

 

Slanted LettersBy slanting the letters, it prevents them from flipping sides and instead weights them toward one side, so that a lowercase B and D would get less easily confused.

 

Longer Ascender and DescenderThere is also a longer ascender and descender in Dyslexie. Lengthening the ascender and descender of the letters allows the differences of individual letters to be  emphasized.

 

Bold CapitalsLarger and bolder capital letters and punctuation marks, help prevent sentences from running together.

 

Different HeightsCreating different heights of letters that are usually twins now have unique features so that they no longer resemble each other entirely. Here, the inner corners of the letters appear at different heights and angles.

 

Higher x AxisThe space of the letters is expanded with a higher X-axis, making the characters more distinct.

 

Better SpacingDyslexie has larger spacing between letters, with the idea that it makes them less likely to become jumbled together and are more clear to read.

 

 

 

Results

Through these many modifications to the proportions, sizing, and spacing of letters, Dyslexie aims to help people with dyslexia read more fluently with higher comprehension (Boer, n.d.). But does it really achieve these goals? Some scientists who study dyslexia have wondered if the type font actually helps and have performed experiments on the subject.

 

The conclusion of one study was that reading with the font Dyslexie doesn’t lead to an increase in reading speed. There was however a decrease in the reading errors when dyslectics read words in the Dyslexie font (Leeuw, 2010). This study just indicates a decrease in general reading errors, but what specific kind of errors were made?

 

Another study used eye-tracking to measure the effect of font type on reading speed. It found that Sans serif, monospaced and roman font styles significantly improved the reading performance over serif, proportional and italic fonts (Rello, L., & Baeza-Yates, R., 2013). This study’s findings go directly against some of the core ideas behind the Dyslexie font. Slanting letters would have similar effects as italics, and changing the lengths and sizes of certain parts of the letters makes them disproportionate.

 

When asked if the new dyslexia font helped, some dyslexic students shared (Burgess, 2012) :

“It helped at first. I really liked it. I didn’t have to focus as much as with the regular font. The reading was easier. But after a while, the new font got actually annoying for me because I noticed the darker bottoms and I was really glad to go back to the regular reading.”

“My eyes didn’t wander away or got distracted as easily as with the regular font.”

“It really didn’t help me because I am a good reader. Maybe it is more helpful for someone who struggles with reading. Not every dyslexic is the same.”

When asked whether the OpenDyslexic font prevented their brain from turning the letters, the younger students unanimously said that it did help “a little bit”. Others said, “No, not really.”

The older students commented that because of having learned to read with the “Help” method, they didn’t struggle with turning letters anymore, just with skipping words or lines at times. “We struggle with new and complicated words just as much as other non-dyslexic students do. Besides, dyslexia is not just about reading, it is about how our brain works and how we think.”

 

images (2)Not all dyslexics have the same cognitive impairments when it comes to reading. There are lots of different routes and paths towards understanding written words. Some can be damaged and others can be spared. The Dyslexie font can help improve some problems for a portion of the dyslexic population, but it also creates some new cognitive difficulties.

 

 

 

 

References

Boer, C. (n.d.). Dyslexie Font: The dyslexia font which eases the reading. Retrieved from http://www.dyslexiefont.com/en/

Burgess, T. (2012, October 7). OpenDyslexic: ‘Does the new dyslexia font help?’ Review by teacher and students. Retrieved from http://www.examiner.com/article/opendyslexic-does-the-new-dyslexia-font-help-review-by-teacher-and-students

Leeuw, R. (2010). Special font for dyslexia?.

Rello, L., & Baeza-Yates, R. (2013, October). Good fonts for dyslexia. InProceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (p. 14). ACM.

Shallow, P. (2014, November 11). The font that could help dyslexics read better. Retrieved from http://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-font-that-helps-dyslexics-read-better/

Hemispheric Dominance

Left-and-right-brain-300x225

Are You Right Brained or Left Brained?

Hemispheric dominance is the idea that both hemispheres of the brain are designed to perform specialized, but different tasks. Both sides of the brain control and receive sensory input from one another, which is known as contralateral control. The performance of tasks may also be referred to as “lateralization.” The theory of hemispheric dominance, however, has been oversimplified for many years due to people confusing the actual science with personality traits.

For example, many people associate the left hemisphere with mathematical skills and logistics, whereas the right hemisphere is known for artistic and imaginative skills. But why is that? It is true that both sides of the brain carry out specific functions, but they should not be categorized as two separate ways of thinking. Many processes are carried out in both sides of the brain. For example, the left side of the brain is dominant when processing speech, even though speech is processed using both sides of the brain. 

All of the very complex behaviors and functions of the brain are shared with different regions on both sides of the brain; therefore, this idea of being right-brained or left-brained is a myth, perpetuated in part by some misinformed “scientific articles”.

—–

On their website, UCMAS Math Schools make the claim that, “By learning abacus through the systematic training approach at UCMAS, children can fully realize their potential by activating both sides of their brain. By consciously using the right side of our brain, we can be more creative.” It is not possible to “consciously” use a specific half of our brain, and our hemispheres do not need to be manually activated. This school is interpreting the concept of hemispheric dominance in a false way to create pseudo-scientific support of their use of abacuses.

UCMAS’ website shows that they are a tutoring program, but they fail to cite any sources in their article on left and right brains. Also, once you click on “More Info on Brain Development”, it brings you to a page which states the following: “Recent studies have proven that the abacus method of mental calculation is extremely effective in activating the right brain. According to the research, the learning and thinking process is enhanced when both sides of the brain participate in a balanced manner.” Of course, none of the studies mentioned in this section are cited. It becomes quite clear that the article is a marketing attempt for getting parents to sign their children up for classes.

—–

Iain McGilchrist, in an article written for the Wall Street Journal, talks of the two hemispheres of the brain as two separate worlds, and says that one hemisphere can come to dominate individuals and even whole cultures. He claims that, “Without the right hemisphere, we are socially and emotionally insensitive, and have an impaired understanding of beauty, art and religion”. This implies that we could actually live without one half of our brains. He goes on, explaining how life is without the left hemisphere and how throughout the ages, certain cultural changes have allowed one hemisphere or another to dominate. He is particularly concerned about Western culture, saying that the result of over 2500 years of mental battles is “an ever greater reliance on the left hemisphere”.

The Wall Street Journal article seems pretty credible at first; after all, it comes from a major publication. But on a closer look, the article comes from their Life and Style section, rather than from their Science section. And the information at the end of the article about the author, he wrote it to promote his new book.

—–

Anandi, the “sleep guru” claims on her website that the left hemisphere is masculine, bearing qualities “such as logic and reason”, while the right hemisphere is feminine, acting as our source of “intuition, creativity and spontaneity”.  Which not only enforces wrong information about the brain, but also enforces incorrect gender roles. She then implies that the difference between the openness of our nostrils is connected to the balance between the the hemispheres.

The sleep guru site is a personal blog/webpage devoted to helping its owner, Anandi, gain new clients. Anandi helpfully lists her credentials on her “Who is the sleep guru?” page. While I am sure that her qualifications make her an excellent meditator and yoga instructor, she has no experience in neuroscience and is therefore not a credible source on hemispheric dominance.

——

There is a lot of misleading information on the internet, which can make it hard to find accurate information about hemispheric dominance online. The first result that pops up when trying to research hemispheric dominance is a link to a quiz which claims to help you determine which hemisphere is most dominant, are you right brain or left brain quiz. Pop culture has adapted hemispheric dominance and turned it into a concept with little scientific basis. It’s important when researching hemispheric dominance, or any other topic, to make sure that the information is coming from a credible source.

 

Sources:

http://www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/neuromyth6.htm

http://ucmas.ca/our-programs/whole-brain-development/left-brain-vs-right-brain/

http://ucmas.ca/our-programs/whole-brain-development/more-info/

http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704304504574609992107994238

http://www.thesleepguru.co.uk/aligning-two-halves/

http://www.thesleepguru.co.uk/who-is-the-sleep-guru/

http://www.web-us.com/brain/braindominance.htm