<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Recontextualize &#38; Redefine</title>
	<link>http://blog.richmond.edu/writing/2009/05/06/recontextualize-redefine/</link>
	<description>the University of Richmond Writing Center’s blog, a resource for all things related to writing.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Essid</title>
		<link>http://blog.richmond.edu/writing/2009/05/06/recontextualize-redefine/#comment-590</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Essid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.richmond.edu/writing/2009/05/06/recontextualize-redefine/#comment-590</guid>
		<description>Over time, I've moved from the popular (but inaccurate) "visual/digital literacy" to "visual analysis" and "digital analysis/fluency."

These take us beyond the alphanumeric text while embracing it.  If we think close reading of "hard texts," a la Core 101-102, is sufficient for first-year students, we are looking backward.

We can drown out the "crap" online by producing work of merit and posting THAT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over time, I&#8217;ve moved from the popular (but inaccurate) &#8220;visual/digital literacy&#8221; to &#8220;visual analysis&#8221; and &#8220;digital analysis/fluency.&#8221;</p>
<p>These take us beyond the alphanumeric text while embracing it.  If we think close reading of &#8220;hard texts,&#8221; a la Core 101-102, is sufficient for first-year students, we are looking backward.</p>
<p>We can drown out the &#8220;crap&#8221; online by producing work of merit and posting THAT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
