<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Ted Bunn's Blog</title>
	<link>http://blog.richmond.edu/physicsbunn</link>
	<description>Department of Physics</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quantitative thinking and environmentalism by Ted Bunn&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Carbon offsets and personal virtuousness</title>
		<link>http://blog.richmond.edu/physicsbunn/2009/04/28/quantitative-thinking-and-environmentalism/#comment-1655</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Bunn&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Carbon offsets and personal virtuousness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.richmond.edu/physicsbunn/2009/04/28/quantitative-thinking-and-environmentalism/#comment-1655</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m objecting to (again) is the very common notion that even if things like offsets do work there&#8217;s something morally [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I&#8217;m objecting to (again) is the very common notion that even if things like offsets do work there&#8217;s something morally [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The zeal of the convert by robert61</title>
		<link>http://blog.richmond.edu/physicsbunn/2009/11/09/the-zeal-of-the-convert/#comment-1576</link>
		<dc:creator>robert61</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.richmond.edu/physicsbunn/2009/11/09/the-zeal-of-the-convert/#comment-1576</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the ref.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the ref.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is probability? by Ted Bunn&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The zeal of the convert</title>
		<link>http://blog.richmond.edu/physicsbunn/2009/01/27/what-is-probability/#comment-1575</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Bunn&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The zeal of the convert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.richmond.edu/physicsbunn/2009/01/27/what-is-probability/#comment-1575</guid>
		<description>[...] be a Bayesian in the second sense of the term: the frequentist notion of probability strikes me as utterly incoherent.  But I think you should be completely agnostic as far as the first point is concerned.  Bayesian [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] be a Bayesian in the second sense of the term: the frequentist notion of probability strikes me as utterly incoherent.  But I think you should be completely agnostic as far as the first point is concerned.  Bayesian [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The cost of SETI by Eric M. Jones</title>
		<link>http://blog.richmond.edu/physicsbunn/2009/09/21/the-cost-of-seti/#comment-1464</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric M. Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 13:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.richmond.edu/physicsbunn/2009/09/21/the-cost-of-seti/#comment-1464</guid>
		<description>Allen's point on secure communication looking like noise is quite true. Years ago I read a SiFi novel where the sender and receiver had synched random number generators for perfectly secure communications. This idea is now nearing reality, even on small scales. 

Also the Earth is going to be radio quiet (with few exceptions) in the next few years. Everything that goes in out out of my place is on cable/internet. No broadcast at all....while in the 1920's-40's there were half-million watt AM broadcast transmitters.

Love Peace Joy
Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allen&#8217;s point on secure communication looking like noise is quite true. Years ago I read a SiFi novel where the sender and receiver had synched random number generators for perfectly secure communications. This idea is now nearing reality, even on small scales. </p>
<p>Also the Earth is going to be radio quiet (with few exceptions) in the next few years. Everything that goes in out out of my place is on cable/internet. No broadcast at all&#8230;.while in the 1920&#8217;s-40&#8217;s there were half-million watt AM broadcast transmitters.</p>
<p>Love Peace Joy<br />
Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to ace the physics GRE by Brent</title>
		<link>http://blog.richmond.edu/physicsbunn/2009/10/23/how-to-ace-the-physics-gre/#comment-1347</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.richmond.edu/physicsbunn/2009/10/23/how-to-ace-the-physics-gre/#comment-1347</guid>
		<description>Sometimes I feel like standardized testing is a lot like pharmeceuticals--a need for them simply materializes every time they come up with a new one through clever advertising and social insecurities.

I feel like physics grad schools would get along fine if the PGRE didn't exist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes I feel like standardized testing is a lot like pharmeceuticals&#8211;a need for them simply materializes every time they come up with a new one through clever advertising and social insecurities.</p>
<p>I feel like physics grad schools would get along fine if the PGRE didn&#8217;t exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Martin Gardner et al. by Kalpana</title>
		<link>http://blog.richmond.edu/physicsbunn/2009/10/20/martin-gardner-et-al/#comment-1314</link>
		<dc:creator>Kalpana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.richmond.edu/physicsbunn/2009/10/20/martin-gardner-et-al/#comment-1314</guid>
		<description>Godel, Escher, Bach was one of my favorite books as well.  I also liked Metamagical Themas.  Both really got me hooked on the interconnectedness of it all.  Interestingly, Hofstadter is now one of my colleagues :).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Godel, Escher, Bach was one of my favorite books as well.  I also liked Metamagical Themas.  Both really got me hooked on the interconnectedness of it all.  Interestingly, Hofstadter is now one of my colleagues :).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If you loved writing and defending your Ph.D. dissertation, by Phillip Helbig</title>
		<link>http://blog.richmond.edu/physicsbunn/2009/10/12/if-you-loved-writing-and-defending-your-phd-dissertation/#comment-1306</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Helbig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.richmond.edu/physicsbunn/2009/10/12/if-you-loved-writing-and-defending-your-phd-dissertation/#comment-1306</guid>
		<description>The Habilitation exists in several countries, not just France.  Originally, it 
was an unpublished article demonstrating your prowess.  Then it involved 
into a thesis, complete with other requirements such as teaching 
experience, defending it etc.  It is supposed to be more work than a 
doctorate.  There are some positions where doing it is part of the deal,
like for doctoral positions.

Your last paragraph makes it sound like habilitation leads automatically
to a permanent job.  It is sometimes a necessary, but never a sufficient,
condition.

Many countries don't have a tenure-track system.  Thus, what is the 
criterion for awarding someone a professorship?  The Habilitation is used 
as a requirement.  People with a Habilitation, but not a permanent
professorship, could become a Privatdozent.  They are allowed to teach,
and are required to in order to retain the title, but aren't paid for it.  In the
old days, they collected money from the students, thus the "privat" as
opposed to paid by the government.

The lack of a tenure-track system is a huge disadvantage, in my view.
In the old days, with few candidates and many jobs, it wasn't as big a
problem.  Now, it means being a postdoc and moving around for years in
the HOPE of landing a permanent job sometime.  Most don't.  I prefer
tenure-track systems.

Germany is gradually moving away from the Habilitation.  The idea is to
replace it with something called a Juniorprofessor.  Sounds like an
embarrassment, but is really something like assistant professor.  Except,
usually, no tenure track.  With more foreign candidates, for a long time
the habilitation has no longer been an official requirement, if there are
equivalent qualifications.

The biggest difference between the States and Europe, though, is the huge
number of small (not just in size) colleges in the States.  If you come from
a prestigious institution, if all else fails you can become a professor at
Cornfield College and at least hang on to something like you imagined 
your career could be.  In Europe, it's basically up or out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Habilitation exists in several countries, not just France.  Originally, it<br />
was an unpublished article demonstrating your prowess.  Then it involved<br />
into a thesis, complete with other requirements such as teaching<br />
experience, defending it etc.  It is supposed to be more work than a<br />
doctorate.  There are some positions where doing it is part of the deal,<br />
like for doctoral positions.</p>
<p>Your last paragraph makes it sound like habilitation leads automatically<br />
to a permanent job.  It is sometimes a necessary, but never a sufficient,<br />
condition.</p>
<p>Many countries don&#8217;t have a tenure-track system.  Thus, what is the<br />
criterion for awarding someone a professorship?  The Habilitation is used<br />
as a requirement.  People with a Habilitation, but not a permanent<br />
professorship, could become a Privatdozent.  They are allowed to teach,<br />
and are required to in order to retain the title, but aren&#8217;t paid for it.  In the<br />
old days, they collected money from the students, thus the &#8220;privat&#8221; as<br />
opposed to paid by the government.</p>
<p>The lack of a tenure-track system is a huge disadvantage, in my view.<br />
In the old days, with few candidates and many jobs, it wasn&#8217;t as big a<br />
problem.  Now, it means being a postdoc and moving around for years in<br />
the HOPE of landing a permanent job sometime.  Most don&#8217;t.  I prefer<br />
tenure-track systems.</p>
<p>Germany is gradually moving away from the Habilitation.  The idea is to<br />
replace it with something called a Juniorprofessor.  Sounds like an<br />
embarrassment, but is really something like assistant professor.  Except,<br />
usually, no tenure track.  With more foreign candidates, for a long time<br />
the habilitation has no longer been an official requirement, if there are<br />
equivalent qualifications.</p>
<p>The biggest difference between the States and Europe, though, is the huge<br />
number of small (not just in size) colleges in the States.  If you come from<br />
a prestigious institution, if all else fails you can become a professor at<br />
Cornfield College and at least hang on to something like you imagined<br />
your career could be.  In Europe, it&#8217;s basically up or out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Want to be a lawyer?  Study physics. by james</title>
		<link>http://blog.richmond.edu/physicsbunn/2009/09/02/want-to-be-a-lawyer-study-physics/#comment-1264</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.richmond.edu/physicsbunn/2009/09/02/want-to-be-a-lawyer-study-physics/#comment-1264</guid>
		<description>Definitely one of the better posts I've read in a while. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely one of the better posts I&#8217;ve read in a while. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rocket fuel from lunar water by Aharon Eviatar</title>
		<link>http://blog.richmond.edu/physicsbunn/2009/07/19/rocket-fuel-from-lunar-water/#comment-1239</link>
		<dc:creator>Aharon Eviatar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 15:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.richmond.edu/physicsbunn/2009/07/19/rocket-fuel-from-lunar-water/#comment-1239</guid>
		<description>I must confess that I tend to agree with Bob Park and also with Gene Parker who, along with others, has pointed out the vulnerability of astronauts to killing radiation once they leave the magnetosphere of Earth.  Even if we made the fuel as you describe, where would anyone go and still stay alive.  If you carried water as your shield and burned it off slowly, who knows?  In any case, Spirit and Opportunity are not as smart as human geologists, but they do not require life support systems.
I have made a living from Voyager, Galileo, Giotto and Cassini (OK, I retired before Cassini made orbit) and I really believe we should stick with robotic probes.  BTW, my blog which deals only marginally with science is at http://sabaofmaayanandhiscousins.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must confess that I tend to agree with Bob Park and also with Gene Parker who, along with others, has pointed out the vulnerability of astronauts to killing radiation once they leave the magnetosphere of Earth.  Even if we made the fuel as you describe, where would anyone go and still stay alive.  If you carried water as your shield and burned it off slowly, who knows?  In any case, Spirit and Opportunity are not as smart as human geologists, but they do not require life support systems.<br />
I have made a living from Voyager, Galileo, Giotto and Cassini (OK, I retired before Cassini made orbit) and I really believe we should stick with robotic probes.  BTW, my blog which deals only marginally with science is at <a href="http://sabaofmaayanandhiscousins.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://sabaofmaayanandhiscousins.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Will we find extraterrestrial life? by Ted Bunn&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The cost of SETI</title>
		<link>http://blog.richmond.edu/physicsbunn/2009/09/14/will-we-find-extraterrestrial-life/#comment-992</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Bunn&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The cost of SETI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.richmond.edu/physicsbunn/2009/09/14/will-we-find-extraterrestrial-life/#comment-992</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve generally had positive, warm fuzzy feelings about SETI.  Even if the odds are terrible, I figured, the payoff is huge, and the cost is low, so why not go [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I&#8217;ve generally had positive, warm fuzzy feelings about SETI.  Even if the odds are terrible, I figured, the payoff is huge, and the cost is low, so why not go [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
