The Deal We Strike With Our Heroes

By Scott T. Allison and George R. Goethals

The price of greatness is responsibility.” – Winston Churchill

A few weeks ago we posted a blog entry that posed the question of whether we expect too much from our heroes.  With so many heroes falling from grace in the past few years, we suggested the possibility that we hold them to too high a standard.  We also offered some reasons why we might expect more virtuous behavior from heroes than we do from the average non-hero.

Our good friend Greg Smith, who is the founder of Agile Writers, read our blog post and contributed a thoughtful comment that really got our attention.  Greg raised the possibility that we enter into an implicit exchange relationship with our heroes.  The exchange relationship carries with it an unspoken agreement that we make with heroes, and it goes something like this:  We agree to give heroes our adulation and support, but in return they must maintain an idealized image of human greatness.

Greg describes the bargain in the following way:  “You [the hero] reflect what we want to see in ourselves.  But if you reflect the reality of us as people and a society, then you’re just one of us after all.  And therefore, you’re no more special than we are and you have to come down from your pedestal and stand in the muck with the rest of us.”

If a hero misbehaves, we consider it a breech of contract and we withdraw our admiration and support.  We may also show considerable anger about the contract violation — witness the outrage directed toward Tiger Woods that still lingers to this day.  A broken agreement can turn a hero into a villain rather quickly and easily. Prominent examples, besides Tiger, include David Petraeus, LeBron James, Lance Armstrong, and Joe Paterno.

The idea that we enter into implicit agreements with the successful and powerful is not a new one.  In 2005, psychologist David Messick published an article in which he proposed that an implicit contract exists between leaders and followers.  The contract states that we’ll let leaders lead us if they provide us with a vision, a sense of pride in the group, and group security and protection.  In return, we’ll give leaders our loyalty, effort, and support.

We may have a similar implied agreement with celebrities and the rich.  The terms of the unspoken agreement may be that we’ll let famous celebrities have their fame and wealth, and we may even become their fans, but only as long as they earn their affluence honestly, pay a higher percentage of taxes, behave well, and don’t abuse their privileged status.

What’s most interesting about these implicit agreements is that highly successful people are either not aware of them, or they find it extremely difficult to honor them.  Those of us among the lowly masses seem to be much more sensitized to these informal contracts with heroes.  Maybe this is because we’d much rather be a hero than a hero would want to be us.  If we’re going to put them up on an enviable pedestal, the least they can do is follow basic rules of common decency.

Sometimes, after they’ve fallen, former heroes know they violated the contract.  Tiger Woods admitted as much.  “I knew my actions were wrong but I convinced myself that normal rules did not apply,” he said.  “I ran straight through the boundaries that a married couple should live by – I thought I could get away with everything I wanted to.  I felt that I had worked hard my entire life and deserved to enjoy all the temptations around me.  I felt I was entitled.”

Tiger’s confession is consistent with the results of several psychological studies showing that the more power and success that people enjoy, the more they believe they don’t need to play by the same rules as the rest of us.  And yet it is when someone becomes a hero that we most expect them to play by those rules.  For this reason, maintaining one’s heroic status may be just as challenging as becoming a hero in the first place.  Ironically, one of the most common ways to become a villain is to become a hero first.

All because of the deal we strike with our heroes.

- – - – - – -

7 Responses to “The Deal We Strike With Our Heroes”


  • Nice article. Heroes, intrinsically, don’t exist. Heroes only exist in the mind of the fan. Hero worship is a function of the fan, not the hero. The bargain isn’t between the hero and the fan – it’s with the fan’s perception of reality and reality itself. Therefore any expectation of heroes is unreasonable. My 2 cents.

  • I guess it depends on who you classify as a hero to begin with – there are huge differences between a cartoon such as Superman, a pop idol or sportstar and HH Dalai Lama, for example…

    Fictional heroes ‘can’t’ fall from grace and some real life ones are extremely unlikely to. This does not mean that ‘all’ heroes chosen by humans will stay heroic/good guys.

  • A great post and so true that we often turn agaisnt our hero’s. do you think that may be something to do with the “pedistal effect” (I just made that up lol) in that we forget that like us. they are human. “To err is human to forgive is divine” Play it forward is one of my favourite films, I often do random acts of kindness but to realy give unconditionally it needs to be anonymously. A brilliant blog we have a lot in common, I will be back.

  • I’ll take this another step further and quote Stan Lee: With great power comes great responsibility. When you become a hero, you set a higher standard for yourself– and that’s the standard you will be judged by. What was once adequacy is now failure. You can’t go back to what you were and have it be good enough.

  • Thanks for this blog! I have been thinking about all of this quite a bit and you helped to shape my thoughts. Thanks! I imagine that many famous people (other than movie stars perhaps) don’t set out to be famous, but the journey must be quite a ride! I am remembering a man who owned a factory in Lowell MA who refused to lay off his employees during a bad financial time. I can’t remember his name – the factory made something like Polar fleece….those decisions to continue to lift up others at the risk of self (illustrated by the great Grace Kelly blog)are to me, real heroes! And, of course, today being MLK Jr day, my thoughts are with his journey…and all the decisions he made. And thinking about Ann Curry’s #26 acts…really, we should all be more kind more often :) Great blogs!

  • ^Thank you, Sally!

    Love that classic Stan Lee quote, RJDiogenes. I should have included it in my blog post. The admonition to heroes that they should be highly responsible is consistent with our thesis that heroism comes with an unspoken contractual agreement requiring the hero to behave himself/herself. Many heroes seem oblivious to this agreement, sadly making the ‘fallen hero’ such a common type of hero.

  • Problem may be in who we choose as heroes. Okay, not that we have much choice in who we adulate. Lance Armstrong broke my heart with his drug use–not so much because I cared how many races he won but because I thought of him every time I forced myself chuffing and grunting up the mile-long hill between my house and the grocery store.

    But his “achievements” didn’t really matter in the grand scheme.

    The people I really admire are the momentary heroes. The pilot, Chesley Sullenberger, who successfully landed his plane full of passengers on the Hudsen river because he was able to control fear and think through the crisis.
    Or the Afghanistan/Iraq veterans who are using their military training by volunteering for emergency rescue work here in the US.
    Or the teachers at Sandy Hook who controlled their fear enough to protect the kids in their classroom.
    You don’t need to know who those people are or who they divorced or cheated on, or what drugs they took to be moved to emulate them.
    Mr. Rogers says, “When something terrible happens, look for the helpers. There are always people helping.”

Leave a Reply